f****d up shit regarding the govt. and Kazaa (old bump)
|
|
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
Posted: 01/21/04 - 03:17 Post subject:
|
|
|
| lauren000 wrote: | | Mugaaz wrote: | Thanks for making youreself even look like more of an idiot. My point was made clear-
| Quote: | To treat all child pornography as the same regardless of the perticipants age is not only irresponsible it is stupid. To hate it based on morality but not dislike other acts of depravity simply becuase of a 12% difference in the victims age is morally irresponsible and in my opinion almost as sick as the people who engage in it.
Simply put, you are a f*****g idiot who enjoys bashing people from a moral high horse built of sand. Your arguments have merit but your reasoning is completely and utterly flawed and naive to the point of lunacy. |
I think the laws for how they are punished should be scaled end of story. If the porn involves 17 year old then they get X amount of years. But if it involves 7 year old then they get X+200 years. You catching my drift? If child pornography is illegal becuase of moral reasons ( I'm not sure the exact reasons it's specific as illegal, i mean it's fairly obvious, but I mean from a legal standpoint ) then a lot of other porn should be illegal as well plain and simgple. If they do not then the law is stupid and unjust and just makes the entire issue deteriorate into chaos when things like what Themy posted happened. The laws need to be more exact and cover more issues, period. They are a joke in current form.
Want examples?
A teen age couple were engaging in **** from ages 15+, The boyfriend happened to film himself having **** with his girlfriend at some point in time when they were 16. His mother was cleaning his room and found the video and called her parents. They became furious and eventually for some reason the police caught wind of the situation. The boyfriend was charged with possession of child pornography. HOW f*****g STUPID IS THAT? There are more examples I can find, but it should be obvious to most already that the law is a joke, and to those whom it isn't I'm not going to bother with. |
I don't believe that urban legend sorry mug. But I do get your point, it's lame that 5 grams of crack is more prison time than forcibly raping 3 women. And is bestiality really legal? |
Idiot/freak
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
lauren000
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 21 Oct 2002 Posts: 3510
Location: colorado springs
|
Posted: 01/21/04 - 03:22 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Kbarr wrote: | | lauren000 wrote: | | Mugaaz wrote: | Thanks for making youreself even look like more of an idiot. My point was made clear-
| Quote: | To treat all child pornography as the same regardless of the perticipants age is not only irresponsible it is stupid. To hate it based on morality but not dislike other acts of depravity simply becuase of a 12% difference in the victims age is morally irresponsible and in my opinion almost as sick as the people who engage in it.
Simply put, you are a f*****g idiot who enjoys bashing people from a moral high horse built of sand. Your arguments have merit but your reasoning is completely and utterly flawed and naive to the point of lunacy. |
I think the laws for how they are punished should be scaled end of story. If the porn involves 17 year old then they get X amount of years. But if it involves 7 year old then they get X+200 years. You catching my drift? If child pornography is illegal becuase of moral reasons ( I'm not sure the exact reasons it's specific as illegal, i mean it's fairly obvious, but I mean from a legal standpoint ) then a lot of other porn should be illegal as well plain and simgple. If they do not then the law is stupid and unjust and just makes the entire issue deteriorate into chaos when things like what Themy posted happened. The laws need to be more exact and cover more issues, period. They are a joke in current form.
Want examples?
A teen age couple were engaging in **** from ages 15+, The boyfriend happened to film himself having **** with his girlfriend at some point in time when they were 16. His mother was cleaning his room and found the video and called her parents. They became furious and eventually for some reason the police caught wind of the situation. The boyfriend was charged with possession of child pornography. HOW f*****g STUPID IS THAT? There are more examples I can find, but it should be obvious to most already that the law is a joke, and to those whom it isn't I'm not going to bother with. |
I don't believe that urban legend sorry mug. But I do get your point, it's lame that 5 grams of crack is more prison time than forcibly raping 3 women. And is bestiality really legal? |
Idiot/freak |
I bet it bothers you I can cut off my penis, but you can't sleep with little girls kbarr.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: 01/21/04 - 03:28 Post subject:
|
|
|
| lauren000 wrote: |
I bet it bothers you I can cut off my penis, but you can't sleep with little girls kbarr. |
Again, you back my point.
Do this in the tub. It can be washed away in a few seconds.
Remember, out of sight, out of mind.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
lauren000
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 21 Oct 2002 Posts: 3510
Location: colorado springs
|
Posted: 01/21/04 - 03:29 Post subject:
|
|
|
where do you get all these suicide pictures.
seriously?
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: 01/21/04 - 03:32 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
How much of your brain did they cut of with your d**k?
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Spitulski
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 23 Nov 2002 Posts: 4344
Location: Washington
|
Posted: 01/21/04 - 12:20 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Kbarr wrote: | | How much of your brain did they cut of with your d**k? |
I think the process removes the entire head.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Tolanin
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 3551
|
Posted: 01/21/04 - 12:58 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Spitulski wrote: | | Kbarr wrote: | | How much of your brain did they cut of with your d**k? |
I think the process removes the entire head. |
lol, you know what they say about people who think with their dicks.
oh ya and mugaaz its fairly well known by everyone that child porn is illegal, if your story is true i still dont feel bad for the guy, how do you acidently tape something?
OPPS i didnt know the cameria was on and pointed at us!!
The issue isnt whether a 16 year old can make the choice, some can some cant, but the arbitrary age is set because one is needed, you cant move it down more cause thats a slippery slope and soon your down to 15, 14, 13, 12 and it gets worse and worse, if you need to view naked children your f****d up just dl 18 year olds.. if your gf is 16 thats your own business, and as long as it stays your own business the govt cant do anything about it, what you do in the privacy of your own home is your own business as long as it is contained there... if you go out and make videos and tell everyone then your prolly gonna be in trouble.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Syke
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 12 Oct 2002 Posts: 2976
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
|
Posted: 01/21/04 - 15:54 Post subject:
|
|
|
Ok look...
Young people are easily manipulated by older people.
Young girls are more prone to be manipulated, because some men are perverts and like to get "tight" p***y. (it's the truth) These sick men can overpower these girls, obviously, because they are older, larger, and stronger. What can you do as a 16 year old girl to defend yourself besides smile and pretend you're going to be ok?
What would you do if you thought you were only going to have ****, but this angry man wanted to video tape it? Would you say no? Would you have the nerve to stand up for yourself and try to run, possibly risking your life in the process? You may end up like one of these girls and have to forcibly submit to a man, on camera, whether you like it or not.
The government knows that young people around/younger than the age of 18 are easily manipulated into these types of situations. People are manipulated into joining gangs for safety in urban areas, rather than staying out of trouble and avoiding the situation completely. It's all a matter of perception, and someone has to set down a law or boundry to help people discern right from wrong.
When an individual reaches the age of 18, it has been widely agreed upon that that individual has earned his/her right to involve themselves with these types of acts. Individuals in america become independant at the age of 18, with a free reign of American liberties. One that includes involvement in pornography. Anything under this age is considered "Child pornography" which has been deemed illegal. It doesn't matter whether she consented or not, it wouldn't specifically state that in the video, and so it is left up to the unfortunate viewer of said pornagraphy to decide, "is this right?"
The law says no, it isn't right and it is against the law, no matter how severe of an infraction of the law it is.
Your friend got busted with one of these videos, so they arrested him and gave him the proper punishment.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Brash
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 20 Oct 2002 Posts: 3958
|
Posted: 01/22/04 - 01:56 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Syke wrote: | Ok look...
Young people are easily manipulated by older people.
Young girls are more prone to be manipulated, because some men are perverts and like to get "tight" p***y. (it's the truth) These sick men can overpower these girls, obviously, because they are older, larger, and stronger. What can you do as a 16 year old girl to defend yourself besides smile and pretend you're going to be ok?
What would you do if you thought you were only going to have ****, but this angry man wanted to video tape it? Would you say no? Would you have the nerve to stand up for yourself and try to run, possibly risking your life in the process? You may end up like one of these girls and have to forcibly submit to a man, on camera, whether you like it or not.
The government knows that young people around/younger than the age of 18 are easily manipulated into these types of situations. People are manipulated into joining gangs for safety in urban areas, rather than staying out of trouble and avoiding the situation completely. It's all a matter of perception, and someone has to set down a law or boundry to help people discern right from wrong.
When an individual reaches the age of 18, it has been widely agreed upon that that individual has earned his/her right to involve themselves with these types of acts. Individuals in america become independant at the age of 18, with a free reign of American liberties. One that includes involvement in pornography. Anything under this age is considered "Child pornography" which has been deemed illegal. It doesn't matter whether she consented or not, it wouldn't specifically state that in the video, and so it is left up to the unfortunate viewer of said pornagraphy to decide, "is this right?"
The law says no, it isn't right and it is against the law, no matter how severe of an infraction of the law it is.
Your friend got busted with one of these videos, so they arrested him and gave him the proper punishment. |
Word !
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Mugaaz
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 3576
|
Posted: 01/22/04 - 04:17 Post subject:
|
|
|
What are you talking about man? The situation you are describing is hardly consentual and is rape. It's illegal ( though hard to prove ) even when they are older then 18. I've been at parties where some 15 or 16 year old wanted to jump me. If it wasn't illegal I would of waxed that ass to a high gloss without feeling bad about it.
People having **** at age 16 isnt illegal in most states, and 2 states have the age set to 14 or above. What age people should be able to have **** is not a part of this dicussion at all whtether you realize it or not. I just find it a joke that you can have **** with a 16 or 14 year old girl in some states (which for the first is probably wrong depending on your age, and for the 2nd is flat out disgusting) yet if you saw it on tape you would go to jail for a LONG LONG time. GO ahead and hit rock bottom on their small p****s, just don't let other people see it!
RETARDED
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: 01/22/04 - 04:24 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Mugaaz wrote: | What are you talking about man? The situation you are describing is hardly consentual and is rape. It's illegal ( though hard to prove ) even when they are older then 18. I've been at parties where some 15 or 16 year old wanted to jump me. If it wasn't illegal I would of waxed that ass to a high gloss without feeling bad about it.
People having **** at age 16 isnt illegal in most states, and 2 states have the age set to 14 or above. What age people should be able to have **** is not a part of this dicussion at all whtether you realize it or not. I just find it a joke that you can have **** with a 16 or 14 year old girl in some states (which for the first is probably wrong depending on your age, and for the 2nd is flat out disgusting) yet if you saw it on tape you would go to jail for a LONG LONG time. GO ahead and hit rock bottom on their small p****s, just don't let other people see it!
RETARDED |
You make a few blanket statements that are missing important details.
In what states is it legal to have **** with a 14 year old. What are the details in this law concerning have this ****. meaning, do you have to be married to have the ****, does it require parental consent?
Do you have this information?
I would be interested to see the exact details, that is if you have it of course. If you don't have the details, your argument holds no weight.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Mugaaz
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 3576
|
Posted: 01/22/04 - 04:36 Post subject:
|
|
|
Hawaii is one, I believe Pennsylvania is the other. Check google if I'm wrong. Quite a few states are 16 as well. And there are a few odd ones with 15/17 though not many.
As far as I know that is the age someone can consent to have ****. I believe some of them have other laws such as they can consent but the other person has to be within 6 year or something.. but that is a vague recollection and may be incorrect.
On a final note. Does it really matter what age it is if it's under 18? If the age of consent is lower then the whole thing is a joke.
edit. I had the wrong states. Here is the list below.
First number is for male/ female ****. 2nd is Male/Male, 3rd is Female/Female
Last edited by Mugaaz on 01/22/04 - 04:41; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Mugaaz
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 3576
|
Posted: 01/22/04 - 04:39 Post subject:
|
|
|
http://www.ageofconsent.com/ageofconsent.htm
USA Alabama Rev 06/2001 16 illegal illegal
USA Alaska Rev 08/2000 16 16 16
USA Arizona Rev 06/2001 18 Law Repealed Law Repealed
USA Arkansas Rev 03/2001 16 Law Invalidated Law Invalidated
USA California Rev 04/2001 18 18 18
USA Colorado Rev 04/2002 15/17 17 17
USA Connecticut
Rev 04/2001 16 16 16
USA D.C. Rev 08/2000 16 Law Repealed Law Repealed
USA Delaware Rev 03/2002 16/18 Law Repealed Law Repealed
USA Florida Rev 06/2001 16/18 Illegal Illegal
USA Georgia Rev 07/2002
MUST READ! 16 16 16
USA Hawaii Rev 03/2002 16 Law Repealed Law Repealed
USA Idaho Rev 04/2001 16/18 Illegal Illegal
USA Illinois 17 17 17
USA Indiana 16 16 16
USA Iowa Rev 03/2002 14/16 Law Repealed Law Repealed
USA Kansas Rev 06/2001 16 illegal illegal
USA Kentucky 16 Law Invalidated Law Invalidated
USA Louisiana Rev 03/2002 17 Illegal Illegal
USA Maine 16 16 16
USA Maryland Rev 04/2002 16 Law Invalidated Law Invalidated
USA Massachusetts
Rev 07/2002 16/18 READ -Law Invalidated READ -Law Invalidated
USA Michigan Rev 04/2001 16 Illegal Illegal
USA Minnesota Rev 03/2002 16 Law Invalidated Law Invalidated
USA Mississippi
Rev 03/2002 16 (laws passed June 1, 1998) Illegal Illegal
USA Missouri Rev 03/2002 14/17 Illegal Illegal
USA Montana Rev 10/99 16/18 18 18
USA Nebraska 17 Law Repealed Law Repealed
USA Nevada Rev 1/2000 16 18 18
USA New Hampshire
Rev 03/2002 16 18 18
USA New Jersey 16 16 16
USA New Mexico 17 13 13
USA New York Rev 03/2002 17 17 17
USA North Carolina
Rev 03/2002 16 Illegal Illegal
USA North Dakota 18 Law Repealed Law Repealed
USA Ohio Rev 11/2000 16 Law Repealed Law Repealed
USA Oklahoma Rev 03/2002 16 16 -illegal??? 16 -illegal???
USA Oregon 18 18 18
USA Pennsylvania 16 16 16
USA Rhode Island
Rev 06/2001 16 Law Repealed Law Repealed
USA South Carolina
Rev 03/2002 14/16-bill pending Illegal Illegal
USA South Dakota 16 Law Repealed 16 Law Repealed 16
USA Tennessee Rev 04/2001 18 Law Invalidated Law Invalidated
USA Texas Rev 03/2002 17 Illegal 03/2001 Illegal 03/2001
USA Utah Rev Rev 04/2001 16/18 Illegal Illegal
USA Vermont 16 Law Repealed Law Repealed
USA Virginia Rev 07/2000 18 illegal illegal
USA Washington
Rev 06/2001 16/18 16/18 16/18
USA West Virginia 16 18? 18?
USA Wisconsin Rev 03/2002 18 18 18
USA Wyoming Rev 12/99 16 / 18? Law Repealed Law Repealed
USA Military Rev 06/2001 16 illegal illegal
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Mugaaz
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 3576
|
Posted: 01/22/04 - 04:42 Post subject:
|
|
|
Haha final note before I go to bed.
In Iowa you can have **** with a 12 year old if you are married. Food for thought.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: 01/22/04 - 04:52 Post subject:
|
|
|
This list is still weak when using it to back your argument
You make it sound like a 14 year old in some states, can just walk out the front door and f**k anyone, of any age, if they want.
That is not the case.
In most if not all states they have a legal age of consent that requires no parental consent. Then the have lower ages that require parental consent, a judges consent, sometimes both.
Here is an example from New Mexico.
| Quote: | WHAT IS THE AGE WITH PARENTAL CONSENT IN NEW MEXICO?
Male: 16 – younger parties may obtain license in special circumstances. Younger parties may obtain license in case of pregnancy or birth of child.
Female: 16 – younger parties may obtain license in special circumstances. Younger parties may obtain license in case of pregnancy or birth of child. |
Here is the site.
http://family-law.freeadvice.com/nm_parental_consent.htm
Some red neck going to court and getting permission for her 14 year old to marry good ole Jim Bob, is not the same as some perv sitting at his computer and watching an illegal tape of little Sally getting boffed by some piece of shit.
But you fail to see that.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Mugaaz
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 3576
|
Posted: 01/22/04 - 05:08 Post subject:
|
|
|
I do see that man. I'm just using exteme examples to make fun of it. Something you of all people should understand.
My point is that the laws regarding child pornography are comedic since a 16 year old is considered the same as a 6 year old. I don't know what the exact punishments are. I just know that a 6 year old is 10 if not a 100 times worse then a 16 year old. The law should address that and punish people to the extent of their crime.
For example. A 17 should be the same thing as a DUI. Where a 7 year old should be the chair without them wetting the sponge.
Also I believe it should address things such as **** torture on film, scat/urine porn, films of rape, snuff porn, beastiality, etc. I believe if you are going to punish one you should punish all of them otherwise it looks ridicilous, don't you think so?
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: 01/22/04 - 05:15 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Mugaaz wrote: | I do see that man. I'm just using exteme examples to make fun of it. Something you of all people should understand.
My point is that the laws regarding child pornography are comedic since a 16 year old is considered the same as a 6 year old. I don't know what the exact punishments are. I just know that a 6 year old is 10 if not a 100 times worse then a 16 year old. The law should address that and punish people to the extent of their crime.
For example. A 17 should be the same thing as a DUI. Where a 7 year old should be the chair without them wetting the sponge.
Also I believe it should address things such as **** torture on film, scat/urine porn, films of rape, snuff porn, beastiality, etc. I believe if you are going to punish one you should punish all of them otherwise it looks ridicilous, don't you think so? |
I think you are to broad in your statements. I'm not up on the exacts of the child porn laws. Are you? And I mean all the little details. You say a 6 year old is looked at exactly as a 16 year old is. I'm not sure thats 100% true, just because you claim it is. You also mix that issue in with 10 others, you cloud your argument making it weak. Its kind of hard to see your exact point. And once the point is identified are you basing your argument on true knowledge of the law or just guessing?
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Mugaaz
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 3576
|
Posted: 01/22/04 - 05:26 Post subject:
|
|
|
Fair enough point. But is anyone on Realpoor a lawyer? I doubt it. I'm not writing an argument for my doctoral thesis here.
I know for certain that the punishment for anything deemed child pornography is horrendous, and that some of this child porn is 1% away from being adult porn.
My overall point?
The law is not just, It does not punish people justly according to their crime.
Why is it illegal? I'm guessing becuase it's disgusting, morally wrong, causes severe damage to the victims, and is an act of violence.
If those really are the reasons why, then many other things need to be punished.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: 01/22/04 - 05:29 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Mugaaz wrote: | Fair enough point. But is anyone on Realpoor a lawyer? I doubt it. I'm not writing an argument for my doctoral thesis here.
I know for certain that the punishment for anything deemed child pornography is horrendous, and that some of this child porn is 1% away from being adult porn.
My overall point?
The law is not just, It does not punish people justly according to their crime.
Why is it illegal? I'm guessing becuase it's disgusting, morally wrong, causes severe damage to the victims, and is an act of violence.
If those really are the reasons why, then many other things need to be punished. |
You are learning...
Lifes a b***h then you die.
Nothing is on the level.
Nothing is perfect.
Now, fetch me a beer and stfu:)
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Brash
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 20 Oct 2002 Posts: 3958
|
Posted: 01/22/04 - 11:48 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Mugaaz wrote: | What are you talking about man? The situation you are describing is hardly consentual and is rape. It's illegal ( though hard to prove ) even when they are older then 18. I've been at parties where some 15 or 16 year old wanted to jump me. If it wasn't illegal I would of waxed that ass to a high gloss without feeling bad about it.
People having **** at age 16 isnt illegal in most states, and 2 states have the age set to 14 or above. What age people should be able to have **** is not a part of this dicussion at all whtether you realize it or not. I just find it a joke that you can have **** with a 16 or 14 year old girl in some states (which for the first is probably wrong depending on your age, and for the 2nd is flat out disgusting) yet if you saw it on tape you would go to jail for a LONG LONG time. GO ahead and hit rock bottom on their small p****s, just don't let other people see it!
RETARDED |
you are a 20 year old man who would wax a 15 year old girl's ass to high gloss if he could. you are the reason these laws exist. it's easy to see why you defend your friend so strongly.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Rennol
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 11 Oct 2002 Posts: 3741
Location: Charleston, IL
|
Posted: 01/22/04 - 13:14 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
you can't go wrong with mature porn sites
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Banzai
Guest
|
Posted: 01/22/04 - 13:32 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
If I taped myself haveing **** with a consentual partner at the age of 13 could I be charged with watching kiddy porn at 30?
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Tolanin
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 3551
|
Posted: 01/22/04 - 13:43 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Banzai wrote: | | If I taped myself haveing **** with a consentual partner at the age of 13 could I be charged with watching kiddy porn at 30? |
technically yes but unless you made it known to people that you had it or showed it to people they cant do anything, privacy laws prevent them for really going deeply into what you do in your own house without real proof. So unless you flaunted that you had it they cant do anything. its kinda a grey area of the law.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Mugaaz
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 3576
|
Posted: 01/22/04 - 13:57 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Brash wrote: | | Mugaaz wrote: | What are you talking about man? The situation you are describing is hardly consentual and is rape. It's illegal ( though hard to prove ) even when they are older then 18. I've been at parties where some 15 or 16 year old wanted to jump me. If it wasn't illegal I would of waxed that ass to a high gloss without feeling bad about it.
People having **** at age 16 isnt illegal in most states, and 2 states have the age set to 14 or above. What age people should be able to have **** is not a part of this dicussion at all whtether you realize it or not. I just find it a joke that you can have **** with a 16 or 14 year old girl in some states (which for the first is probably wrong depending on your age, and for the 2nd is flat out disgusting) yet if you saw it on tape you would go to jail for a LONG LONG time. GO ahead and hit rock bottom on their small p****s, just don't let other people see it!
RETARDED |
you are a 20 year old man who would wax a 15 year old girl's ass to high gloss if he could. you are the reason these laws exist. it's easy to see why you defend your friend so strongly. |
Wow. Thanks for that insightful comment. You truly are as wise as Plato and Socrates combined. Not.
Throw out the fact that it's legal in a few states. Did you ever go to high school? I sure as hell did. And I know for a fact that I found girls attractive then and would of had **** with as many of them as I could. Now that it's a few years later I'm magically no longer supposed to not find some attractive girls attractive? Gimme a break. I laugh in you stupid face if you think I am going to feel one iota of guilt for finding some girls under the age of 18 attractive, becuase I know every other warm blooded American male has and does on a regular basis. You know what that means when you find someone attractive? That you want to copulate with them. It's a basic animilistic **** response driving you on to mate with a **** partner. It's human will and the desire to rise above our animal side that makes us try to mate within certain social boundrys. And I agree that we should. But it's foolish to believe that a man is somehow morally bankrupt for finding a girl out of social guidelines attractive.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Tolanin
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 3551
|
Posted: 01/22/04 - 14:02 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Mugaaz wrote: | | Brash wrote: | | Mugaaz wrote: | What are you talking about man? The situation you are describing is hardly consentual and is rape. It's illegal ( though hard to prove ) even when they are older then 18. I've been at parties where some 15 or 16 year old wanted to jump me. If it wasn't illegal I would of waxed that ass to a high gloss without feeling bad about it.
People having **** at age 16 isnt illegal in most states, and 2 states have the age set to 14 or above. What age people should be able to have **** is not a part of this dicussion at all whtether you realize it or not. I just find it a joke that you can have **** with a 16 or 14 year old girl in some states (which for the first is probably wrong depending on your age, and for the 2nd is flat out disgusting) yet if you saw it on tape you would go to jail for a LONG LONG time. GO ahead and hit rock bottom on their small p****s, just don't let other people see it!
RETARDED |
you are a 20 year old man who would wax a 15 year old girl's ass to high gloss if he could. you are the reason these laws exist. it's easy to see why you defend your friend so strongly. |
Wow. Thanks for that insightful comment. You truly are as wise as Plato and Socrates combined. Not.
Throw out the fact that it's legal in a few states. Did you ever go to high school? I sure as hell did. And I know for a fact that I found girls attractive then and would of had **** with as many of them as I could. Now that it's a few years later I'm magically no longer supposed to not find some attractive girls attractive? Gimme a break. I laugh in you stupid face if you think I am going to feel one iota of guilt for finding some girls under the age of 18 attractive, becuase I know every other warm blooded American male has and does on a regular basis. You know what that means when you find someone attractive? That you want to copulate with them. It's a basic animilistic **** response driving you on to mate with a **** partner. It's human will and the desire to rise above our animal side that makes us try to mate within certain social boundrys. And I agree that we should. But it's foolish to believe that a man is somehow morally bankrupt for finding a girl out of social guidelines attractive. |
But you didnt just say you were attracted, of course you are thats normal but you said you would act on your attraction and take advantage of a minor which is entirely different and for that your sick and f****d up.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
hitachi
RealPoor Sensei

Joined: 11 Oct 2002 Posts: 1508
Location: Maryland
|
Posted: 01/22/04 - 14:12 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Tolanin wrote: | | Mugaaz wrote: | | Brash wrote: | | Mugaaz wrote: | What are you talking about man? The situation you are describing is hardly consentual and is rape. It's illegal ( though hard to prove ) even when they are older then 18. I've been at parties where some 15 or 16 year old wanted to jump me. If it wasn't illegal I would of waxed that ass to a high gloss without feeling bad about it.
People having **** at age 16 isnt illegal in most states, and 2 states have the age set to 14 or above. What age people should be able to have **** is not a part of this dicussion at all whtether you realize it or not. I just find it a joke that you can have **** with a 16 or 14 year old girl in some states (which for the first is probably wrong depending on your age, and for the 2nd is flat out disgusting) yet if you saw it on tape you would go to jail for a LONG LONG time. GO ahead and hit rock bottom on their small p****s, just don't let other people see it!
RETARDED |
you are a 20 year old man who would wax a 15 year old girl's ass to high gloss if he could. you are the reason these laws exist. it's easy to see why you defend your friend so strongly. |
Wow. Thanks for that insightful comment. You truly are as wise as Plato and Socrates combined. Not.
Throw out the fact that it's legal in a few states. Did you ever go to high school? I sure as hell did. And I know for a fact that I found girls attractive then and would of had **** with as many of them as I could. Now that it's a few years later I'm magically no longer supposed to not find some attractive girls attractive? Gimme a break. I laugh in you stupid face if you think I am going to feel one iota of guilt for finding some girls under the age of 18 attractive, becuase I know every other warm blooded American male has and does on a regular basis. You know what that means when you find someone attractive? That you want to copulate with them. It's a basic animilistic **** response driving you on to mate with a **** partner. It's human will and the desire to rise above our animal side that makes us try to mate within certain social boundrys. And I agree that we should. But it's foolish to believe that a man is somehow morally bankrupt for finding a girl out of social guidelines attractive. |
But you didnt just say you were attracted, of course you are thats normal but you said you would act on your attraction and take advantage of a minor which is entirely different and for that your sick and f****d up. |
actually i thought he said he had the chance to and didnt. doesnt that mean he isnt sick an f****d up, but hes just like an normal human being and can control himself?
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Mugaaz
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 3576
|
Posted: 01/22/04 - 14:55 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
I said if it wasn't illegal I would of made her sore for a week, but it is so I said no. If you can't even read maybe you shouldn't be writing arguments and debating?
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Syke
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 12 Oct 2002 Posts: 2976
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
|
Posted: 01/22/04 - 14:59 Post subject:
|
|
|
| hitachi wrote: | | Tolanin wrote: | | Mugaaz wrote: | | Brash wrote: | | Mugaaz wrote: | What are you talking about man? The situation you are describing is hardly consentual and is rape. It's illegal ( though hard to prove ) even when they are older then 18. I've been at parties where some 15 or 16 year old wanted to jump me. If it wasn't illegal I would of waxed that ass to a high gloss without feeling bad about it.
People having **** at age 16 isnt illegal in most states, and 2 states have the age set to 14 or above. What age people should be able to have **** is not a part of this dicussion at all whtether you realize it or not. I just find it a joke that you can have **** with a 16 or 14 year old girl in some states (which for the first is probably wrong depending on your age, and for the 2nd is flat out disgusting) yet if you saw it on tape you would go to jail for a LONG LONG time. GO ahead and hit rock bottom on their small p****s, just don't let other people see it!
RETARDED |
you are a 20 year old man who would wax a 15 year old girl's ass to high gloss if he could. you are the reason these laws exist. it's easy to see why you defend your friend so strongly. |
Wow. Thanks for that insightful comment. You truly are as wise as Plato and Socrates combined. Not.
Throw out the fact that it's legal in a few states. Did you ever go to high school? I sure as hell did. And I know for a fact that I found girls attractive then and would of had **** with as many of them as I could. Now that it's a few years later I'm magically no longer supposed to not find some attractive girls attractive? Gimme a break. I laugh in you stupid face if you think I am going to feel one iota of guilt for finding some girls under the age of 18 attractive, becuase I know every other warm blooded American male has and does on a regular basis. You know what that means when you find someone attractive? That you want to copulate with them. It's a basic animilistic **** response driving you on to mate with a **** partner. It's human will and the desire to rise above our animal side that makes us try to mate within certain social boundrys. And I agree that we should. But it's foolish to believe that a man is somehow morally bankrupt for finding a girl out of social guidelines attractive. |
But you didnt just say you were attracted, of course you are thats normal but you said you would act on your attraction and take advantage of a minor which is entirely different and for that your sick and f****d up. |
actually i thought he said he had the chance to and didnt. doesnt that mean he isnt sick an f****d up, but hes just like an normal human being and can control himself? |
Well, he just said he'd have **** with them as much as he could...so I dunno.... lol.
I understand Mugaaz's point here, finding girls at the age of 17 to be attractive while being 20 yourself is not a horrendous offense. They are underage, yes, according to America's social structure at this point, but that does not mean men will stop finding girls under this age attractive.
It means they have to be responsible enough to make these decisions, and have the proper motivation and permission to be having ****. If these children are having **** without parental or judicial permission, they are doing something wrong, and it's left up to the parents of either party to employ proper punishment. Whether or not they leave it up to the government to punish the kid(s) is up to the parent(s).
Any girl under the age of 18, according to California's standards, is not yet old enough to participate in **** acts in front of a camera for the purpose of distribution. You need parental permission or judicial permission just to have **** in the first place. Obviously, the people in the videos your friend was watching did not have any type of permission to be having **** and are recording/distributing it, which is a double offense. It doesn't matter if the girl in the video is a total s**t and consented, she can't consent herself, she needs parental or judicial permission. She is getting taken advantage of, she is a minor.
It is illegal for your friend to view said material. He had this stuff, he was punished. That is it. It doesn't matter how far down into his psyche you delve, he was in the wrong and he was punished. Tough shit man, you live and you learn.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Shanda
Luke Warm

Joined: 14 Oct 2002 Posts: 181
|
Posted: 01/22/04 - 15:39 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Mugaaz wrote: | | I said if it wasn't illegal I would of made her sore for a week, but it is so I said no. If you can't even read maybe you shouldn't be writing arguments and debating? |
Actually, this is exactly the reason why there are laws in place. Please note the 'if it wasn't illegal' part. He can control himself *because* it is illegal.
While I would agree that there are young people that are capable of consent before they reach legal age, the legal system has to set an age at which it is determined that a large majority can consent. These laws don't just protect against forcible rape, but also mental/emotional coercion, and just plain bad judgment. From a psychological point of view, young people are experiencing overwhelming **** responses and are learning how to deal with them. Since we do not live in a perfect world in which responsible adults realize this and react accordingly, laws are required that protect the young not just from predators, but from themselves.
Given the difficulty of proving rape in our legal system, having these laws in place is necessary. If our system required that a young woman (or man) had to go through what adult victims are put through, there would be almost no protection under law except in the most extreme and/or easily tried cases.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Brash
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 20 Oct 2002 Posts: 3958
|
Posted: 01/22/04 - 16:05 Post subject:
|
|
|
| hitachi wrote: | | Tolanin wrote: | | Mugaaz wrote: | | Brash wrote: | | Mugaaz wrote: | What are you talking about man? The situation you are describing is hardly consentual and is rape. It's illegal ( though hard to prove ) even when they are older then 18. I've been at parties where some 15 or 16 year old wanted to jump me. If it wasn't illegal I would of waxed that ass to a high gloss without feeling bad about it.
People having **** at age 16 isnt illegal in most states, and 2 states have the age set to 14 or above. What age people should be able to have **** is not a part of this dicussion at all whtether you realize it or not. I just find it a joke that you can have **** with a 16 or 14 year old girl in some states (which for the first is probably wrong depending on your age, and for the 2nd is flat out disgusting) yet if you saw it on tape you would go to jail for a LONG LONG time. GO ahead and hit rock bottom on their small p****s, just don't let other people see it!
RETARDED |
you are a 20 year old man who would wax a 15 year old girl's ass to high gloss if he could. you are the reason these laws exist. it's easy to see why you defend your friend so strongly. |
Wow. Thanks for that insightful comment. You truly are as wise as Plato and Socrates combined. Not.
Throw out the fact that it's legal in a few states. Did you ever go to high school? I sure as hell did. And I know for a fact that I found girls attractive then and would of had **** with as many of them as I could. Now that it's a few years later I'm magically no longer supposed to not find some attractive girls attractive? Gimme a break. I laugh in you stupid face if you think I am going to feel one iota of guilt for finding some girls under the age of 18 attractive, becuase I know every other warm blooded American male has and does on a regular basis. You know what that means when you find someone attractive? That you want to copulate with them. It's a basic animilistic **** response driving you on to mate with a **** partner. It's human will and the desire to rise above our animal side that makes us try to mate within certain social boundrys. And I agree that we should. But it's foolish to believe that a man is somehow morally bankrupt for finding a girl out of social guidelines attractive. |
But you didnt just say you were attracted, of course you are thats normal but you said you would act on your attraction and take advantage of a minor which is entirely different and for that your sick and f****d up. |
actually i thought he said he had the chance to and didnt. doesnt that mean he isnt sick an f****d up, but hes just like an normal human being and can control himself? |
No that just means he wouldn't do it because he is scared of going to jail . He openly says he would f**k a 15 year old little girl and has no moral problems with it . that is what makes him a sick ass would be child molester if only he wouldnt go to jail for doing it . who knows maybe he will get over the jail part soon enough and start to attack kids soon ....
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
LIFEFORM SOCIAL COMMUNITY NETWORK
| |