The time now is 09/03/08 - 08:39
Log in: Username: Password:
Search forums for:
  

f**k al qaida, anyone who doesn't want war can look at this

Post new topic   Reply to topic
Author Message
themy
Sir Postalot
Sir Postalot


Joined: 14 Oct 2002
Posts: 1153



PostPosted: 05/11/04 - 14:06    Post subject: f**k al qaida, anyone who doesn't want war can look at this Reply with quote

http://cnn.netscape.cnn.com/news/story.jsp?floc=NW_1-T&oldflok=FF-APO-1107&idq=/ff/story/0001%2F20040511%2F1338028496.htm&sc=1107
Back to top
median
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 2183
Location: Hamillton, Canada



PostPosted: 05/11/04 - 14:09    Post subject: Reply with quote

Crying or Very sad
Back to top
Zoll
Luke Warm
Luke Warm


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 153
Location: Florida



PostPosted: 05/11/04 - 14:13    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sometimes it seems like the only way we are going to win is genocide.
Back to top
Maldek
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 2089



PostPosted: 05/11/04 - 14:25    Post subject: Reply with quote

bush & comp never gave a shit about anything but oil. if it wasnt for morale standards we would have just carpet-bombed iraq and paid halliburton to pave the place flat.
Back to top
Ikkan
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 06 Sep 2003
Posts: 3086



PostPosted: 05/11/04 - 14:38    Post subject: Reply with quote

=/

Last edited by Ikkan on 05/11/04 - 14:45; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Rennol
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 3741
Location: Charleston, IL



PostPosted: 05/11/04 - 14:40    Post subject: Reply with quote

moral and morale are two completely different words

jesus christ
Back to top
compusmack
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 15 Oct 2002
Posts: 6354



PostPosted: 05/11/04 - 14:58    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maldek wrote:
bush & comp never gave a shit about anything but oil. if it wasnt for morale standards we would have just carpet-bombed iraq and paid halliburton to pave the place flat.


Horribly wrong. It has nothing to do with the oil.

Why do people still cling to this ridiculous idea? We didn't get jack shit in terms of oil, why the hell do you think the prices are so high right now?
Back to top
Guest








PostPosted: 05/11/04 - 15:01    Post subject: Reply with quote

compusmack wrote:
Maldek wrote:
bush & comp never gave a shit about anything but oil. if it wasnt for morale standards we would have just carpet-bombed iraq and paid halliburton to pave the place flat.


Horribly wrong. It has nothing to do with the oil.

Why do people still cling to this ridiculous idea? We didn't get jack shit in terms of oil, why the hell do you think the prices are so high right now?


maldek is a fool, what do you expect. He is an example of all the idiots in the US who need to die. They weaken the country and the human race in general.
Back to top
Nobonius
Sir Postalot
Sir Postalot


Joined: 27 Dec 2002
Posts: 1121



PostPosted: 05/11/04 - 15:14    Post subject: Reply with quote

Crying or Very sad
Back to top
Noktyn
Luke Warm
Luke Warm


Joined: 11 Jan 2004
Posts: 106



PostPosted: 05/11/04 - 15:20    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's a sad story and I hope that those f*****s get what they deserve. That disgusts me to no end.
Back to top
sinrakin
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 7044



PostPosted: 05/11/04 - 16:05    Post subject: Reply with quote

It disgusts me too. I just wonder why so many people are disgusted by this, but felt no disgust when we dropped bombs on innocent suburban neighborhoods killing whole families every time we heard a rumor that Saddam or one of his sons or associates was there, or when a US soldier aims at an eight year old girl and shoots her in the head and the military says it was a "warning shot" that "went astray", or when we beat people to death in prisons, or our soldiers harness and ride an innocent 70 year old woman like a donkey in prison because they think she might know someone they're interested in, or when US troops expel dying children, that they shot, from hospitals to make room for US soldiers.

It's all disgusting. It's just not all surprising.
Back to top
Confused
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 08 Feb 2004
Posts: 6730



PostPosted: 05/11/04 - 16:09    Post subject: Reply with quote

sinrakin wrote:
It disgusts me too. I just wonder why so many people are disgusted by this, but felt no disgust when we dropped bombs on innocent suburban neighborhoods killing whole families every time we heard a rumor that Saddam or one of his sons or associates was there, or when a US soldier aims at an eight year old girl and shoots her in the head and the military says it was a "warning shot" that "went astray", or when we beat people to death in prisons, or our soldiers harness and ride an innocent 70 year old woman like a donkey in prison because they think she might know someone they're interested in, or when US troops expel dying children, that they shot, from hospitals to make room for US soldiers.

It's all disgusting. It's just not all surprising.

Only scum would compare an accidental shooting to the intentional beheading of an innocent civilian.
Back to top
Syke
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 12 Oct 2002
Posts: 2976
Location: Huntington Beach, CA



PostPosted: 05/11/04 - 16:15    Post subject: Reply with quote

Confused wrote:
sinrakin wrote:
It disgusts me too. I just wonder why so many people are disgusted by this, but felt no disgust when we dropped bombs on innocent suburban neighborhoods killing whole families every time we heard a rumor that Saddam or one of his sons or associates was there, or when a US soldier aims at an eight year old girl and shoots her in the head and the military says it was a "warning shot" that "went astray", or when we beat people to death in prisons, or our soldiers harness and ride an innocent 70 year old woman like a donkey in prison because they think she might know someone they're interested in, or when US troops expel dying children, that they shot, from hospitals to make room for US soldiers.

It's all disgusting. It's just not all surprising.

Only scum would compare an accidental shooting to the intentional beheading of an innocent civilian.


You mean, thousands of accidental shootings/bombings? SCUMBAG INDEED!
Back to top
Confused
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 08 Feb 2004
Posts: 6730



PostPosted: 05/11/04 - 16:20    Post subject: Reply with quote

Syke wrote:
Confused wrote:
sinrakin wrote:
It disgusts me too. I just wonder why so many people are disgusted by this, but felt no disgust when we dropped bombs on innocent suburban neighborhoods killing whole families every time we heard a rumor that Saddam or one of his sons or associates was there, or when a US soldier aims at an eight year old girl and shoots her in the head and the military says it was a "warning shot" that "went astray", or when we beat people to death in prisons, or our soldiers harness and ride an innocent 70 year old woman like a donkey in prison because they think she might know someone they're interested in, or when US troops expel dying children, that they shot, from hospitals to make room for US soldiers.

It's all disgusting. It's just not all surprising.

Only scum would compare an accidental shooting to the intentional beheading of an innocent civilian.


You mean, thousands of accidental shootings/bombings? SCUMBAG INDEED!

No, I mean one...scumbag. No war has minimized civilian deaths so effectively as this one. And no war has prevented so many deaths as this one. Saddam has killed more civilians in a single day. So if you want to criticise America's minimal killing of civilians during the invasion, then you also must take responsibility for the violent murder of hundreds of thousands more. Congratulations. You support genocide.
Back to top
Zapper
RealPoor Sensei
RealPoor Sensei


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 1512
Location: Connecticut



PostPosted: 05/11/04 - 16:22    Post subject: Reply with quote

So basically you are condoning murder? Since Saddam killed many we can kill a few? You f*****g scumbag you think just like a Nazi.
Back to top
Confused
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 08 Feb 2004
Posts: 6730



PostPosted: 05/11/04 - 16:25    Post subject: Reply with quote

Zapper wrote:
So basically you are condoning murder? Since Saddam killed many we can kill a few? You f*****g scumbag you think just like a Nazi.

Doing nothing condones murder. Stopping it doesn't. You condone genocide. You are worse than the worst of the nazis.
Back to top
Booker
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 12 Oct 2002
Posts: 2562
Location: Corvallis, Oregon



PostPosted: 05/11/04 - 16:27    Post subject: Reply with quote

some of our soldiers did publically humiliate iraqi prisoners; i would be mad also.

you cannot expect them to have the same worldview and moral values as you do.
Back to top
Confused
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 08 Feb 2004
Posts: 6730



PostPosted: 05/11/04 - 16:28    Post subject: Reply with quote

Booker wrote:
some of our soldiers did publically humiliate iraqi prisoners; i would be mad also.

you cannot expect them to have the same worldview and moral values as you do.

were you trying to write a haiku?
Back to top
Haroun Zehra
Sir Postalot
Sir Postalot


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 1235



PostPosted: 05/11/04 - 16:32    Post subject: Reply with quote

1. I don't doubt that it is wrong for a foreigner to kill an American because of a political agenda. However, if you want to be taken seriously, show us that you care about Americans killing Americans for their wallets, their cars, their wives, every single day, first.

2. The whole thing may not be ALL about oil. However, if you don't think it's at least partially about oil, well, you're foolish.
Back to top
Xthos
Can't Stop Posting
Can't Stop Posting


Joined: 09 Nov 2002
Posts: 550



PostPosted: 05/11/04 - 16:39    Post subject: Reply with quote

You people need to learn the difference between a accident and murder. I was in the Army, and NO ONE I knew would aim and shoot at a 6 year old innocent girl and purposfully kill her.


Bombs unfortunately had to be dropped to defeat Saddam, yes innocent people died, but they thought less innocent people would die if they could kill him and get him out of the way early. It was a move to reduce the loss of innocent life, not a careless, who gives a shit who we kill thing. The civilian casualties are rediculously low for a war, yeah it sucks it has to even be one person...but Saddam wasn't going to just say heres my keys to the kingdom. That guy had to go imo, he killed and starved more people then we will accidently kill...So while its bad, its a improvement. I do not second guess Saddam needing to go, but I do wonder if those religious zealots will ever be able to have a goverment that doesnt treat them like shit and rule by terror. I am not saying everyone in Iraq is like that, but their is enough to spoil it for the decent people, I am beginning to think.


Recent polls showed that the Iraqis didn't really like the US, but they thought Iraq would be better off in 5 years without Saddam then they would of with him.
Back to top
Confused
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 08 Feb 2004
Posts: 6730



PostPosted: 05/11/04 - 16:40    Post subject: Reply with quote

Haroun Zehra wrote:
1. I don't doubt that it is wrong for a foreigner to kill an American because of a political agenda. However, if you want to be taken seriously, show us that you care about Americans killing Americans for their wallets, their cars, their wives, every single day, first.

2. The whole thing may not be ALL about oil. However, if you don't think it's at least partially about oil, well, you're foolish.







moron
Back to top
Syke
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 12 Oct 2002
Posts: 2976
Location: Huntington Beach, CA



PostPosted: 05/11/04 - 16:41    Post subject: Reply with quote

Confused wrote:
Syke wrote:
Confused wrote:
sinrakin wrote:
It disgusts me too. I just wonder why so many people are disgusted by this, but felt no disgust when we dropped bombs on innocent suburban neighborhoods killing whole families every time we heard a rumor that Saddam or one of his sons or associates was there, or when a US soldier aims at an eight year old girl and shoots her in the head and the military says it was a "warning shot" that "went astray", or when we beat people to death in prisons, or our soldiers harness and ride an innocent 70 year old woman like a donkey in prison because they think she might know someone they're interested in, or when US troops expel dying children, that they shot, from hospitals to make room for US soldiers.

It's all disgusting. It's just not all surprising.

Only scum would compare an accidental shooting to the intentional beheading of an innocent civilian.


You mean, thousands of accidental shootings/bombings? SCUMBAG INDEED!

No, I mean one...scumbag. No war has minimized civilian deaths so effectively as this one. And no war has prevented so many deaths as this one. Saddam has killed more civilians in a single day. So if you want to criticise America's minimal killing of civilians during the invasion, then you also must take responsibility for the violent murder of hundreds of thousands more. Congratulations. You support genocide.



It's a tricky situation, but there are other solutions I am sure of it.

Thanks for stereotyping once again though.. Can't get enough of it, can you?

I'd like to coin your little phrase..."Whatever you need to say to make you feel better about yourself."
Back to top
Xthos
Can't Stop Posting
Can't Stop Posting


Joined: 09 Nov 2002
Posts: 550



PostPosted: 05/11/04 - 16:43    Post subject: Reply with quote

Haroun Zehra wrote:
1. I don't doubt that it is wrong for a foreigner to kill an American because of a political agenda. However, if you want to be taken seriously, show us that you care about Americans killing Americans for their wallets, their cars, their wives, every single day, first.

2. The whole thing may not be ALL about oil. However, if you don't think it's at least partially about oil, well, you're foolish.




1. WTF are you talking about, the US is the only country with crime? Last checked the police arrest, and judges put people in jail for stealing and killing.... If we didn't give a shit, we would fire all the cops and judges. I guess I am just missing your point here....


2. I will tell you how oil figures into this, Iraq is a rich country because of the oil. So it makes him more capable of being a threat and a menace, verse another country with the same attrocities going on, i.e. some of the african nations that are like Iraq, but poor. Sadly one people suffering shouldn't be greater then anothers, but it is.
Back to top
Confused
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 08 Feb 2004
Posts: 6730



PostPosted: 05/11/04 - 16:44    Post subject: Reply with quote

Syke wrote:
Confused wrote:
Syke wrote:
Confused wrote:
sinrakin wrote:
It disgusts me too. I just wonder why so many people are disgusted by this, but felt no disgust when we dropped bombs on innocent suburban neighborhoods killing whole families every time we heard a rumor that Saddam or one of his sons or associates was there, or when a US soldier aims at an eight year old girl and shoots her in the head and the military says it was a "warning shot" that "went astray", or when we beat people to death in prisons, or our soldiers harness and ride an innocent 70 year old woman like a donkey in prison because they think she might know someone they're interested in, or when US troops expel dying children, that they shot, from hospitals to make room for US soldiers.

It's all disgusting. It's just not all surprising.

Only scum would compare an accidental shooting to the intentional beheading of an innocent civilian.


You mean, thousands of accidental shootings/bombings? SCUMBAG INDEED!

No, I mean one...scumbag. No war has minimized civilian deaths so effectively as this one. And no war has prevented so many deaths as this one. Saddam has killed more civilians in a single day. So if you want to criticise America's minimal killing of civilians during the invasion, then you also must take responsibility for the violent murder of hundreds of thousands more. Congratulations. You support genocide.



It's a tricky situation, but there are other solutions I am sure of it.

Thanks for stereotyping once again though.. Can't get enough of it, can you?

I'd like to coin your little phrase..."Whatever you need to say to make you feel better about yourself."

Wrong. You support genocide. The world tried (and failed) to get him out via peaceful means for over 10 years. During that time he killed over a million people. Every additional year you want of negotion resulted in another 100,000 deaths. Approximately the same number of people accidentally died in the time frame of the invasion that would have intentionally been killed by your precious leader. So yes, to say that you would rather the US not invade is the same as saying you condone the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians. You're a great person. Can I get a hug from you?
Back to top
Confused
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 08 Feb 2004
Posts: 6730



PostPosted: 05/11/04 - 16:46    Post subject: Reply with quote

Xthos wrote:

2. I will tell you how oil figures into this, Iraq is a rich country because of the oil. So it makes him more capable of being a threat and a menace, verse another country with the same attrocities going on, i.e. some of the african nations that are like Iraq, but poor. Sadly one people suffering shouldn't be greater then anothers, but it is.

Let's not forget the UN's affinity for illegal oil deals. That came into play too.
Back to top
Syke
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 12 Oct 2002
Posts: 2976
Location: Huntington Beach, CA



PostPosted: 05/11/04 - 16:52    Post subject: Reply with quote

Confused wrote:
Syke wrote:
Confused wrote:
Syke wrote:
Confused wrote:
sinrakin wrote:
It disgusts me too. I just wonder why so many people are disgusted by this, but felt no disgust when we dropped bombs on innocent suburban neighborhoods killing whole families every time we heard a rumor that Saddam or one of his sons or associates was there, or when a US soldier aims at an eight year old girl and shoots her in the head and the military says it was a "warning shot" that "went astray", or when we beat people to death in prisons, or our soldiers harness and ride an innocent 70 year old woman like a donkey in prison because they think she might know someone they're interested in, or when US troops expel dying children, that they shot, from hospitals to make room for US soldiers.

It's all disgusting. It's just not all surprising.

Only scum would compare an accidental shooting to the intentional beheading of an innocent civilian.


You mean, thousands of accidental shootings/bombings? SCUMBAG INDEED!

No, I mean one...scumbag. No war has minimized civilian deaths so effectively as this one. And no war has prevented so many deaths as this one. Saddam has killed more civilians in a single day. So if you want to criticise America's minimal killing of civilians during the invasion, then you also must take responsibility for the violent murder of hundreds of thousands more. Congratulations. You support genocide.



It's a tricky situation, but there are other solutions I am sure of it.

Thanks for stereotyping once again though.. Can't get enough of it, can you?

I'd like to coin your little phrase..."Whatever you need to say to make you feel better about yourself."

Wrong. You support genocide. The world tried (and failed) to get him out via peaceful means for over 10 years. During that time he killed over a million people. Every additional year you want of negotion resulted in another 100,000 deaths. Approximately the same number of people accidentally died in the time frame of the invasion that would have intentionally been killed by your precious leader. So yes, to say that you would rather the US not invade is the same as saying you condone the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians. You're a great person. Can I get a hug from you?


Stereotyping again are we? Did I say I wanted to go the same route that has been tread the past 10 years? No... Did I say I condone what Saddam has done and would have done? No....

Do you even know what's been done to take Saddam out of power in the past 10 years, or are you just pulling that little fact out of your ass? Why not show us what has been done to remove Saddam? I never really heard anything about ousting saddam until the recent talk of WoMD over the past few years. So, please enlighten me as to how all our efforts in removing saddam in the past 10 years have been thwarted.

Why don't you step the f**k back and take a look at what I'm saying instead of putting me into your "liberal leftist ignorant social scumbag who supports genocide" category, it seems to be what you crave lately.

No hug for you...
Back to top
Haroun Zehra
Sir Postalot
Sir Postalot


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 1235



PostPosted: 05/11/04 - 17:00    Post subject: Reply with quote

Confused wrote:
Haroun Zehra wrote:
1. I don't doubt that it is wrong for a foreigner to kill an American because of a political agenda. However, if you want to be taken seriously, show us that you care about Americans killing Americans for their wallets, their cars, their wives, every single day, first.

2. The whole thing may not be ALL about oil. However, if you don't think it's at least partially about oil, well, you're foolish.




If you can only see the impact up to the cost of gas TODAY, well, you are pretty simple-minded indeed.



moron
Back to top
Confused
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 08 Feb 2004
Posts: 6730



PostPosted: 05/11/04 - 17:15    Post subject: Reply with quote

Haroun Zehra wrote:
Confused wrote:
Haroun Zehra wrote:
1. I don't doubt that it is wrong for a foreigner to kill an American because of a political agenda. However, if you want to be taken seriously, show us that you care about Americans killing Americans for their wallets, their cars, their wives, every single day, first.

2. The whole thing may not be ALL about oil. However, if you don't think it's at least partially about oil, well, you're foolish.




If you can only see the impact up to the cost of gas TODAY, well, you are pretty simple-minded indeed.



moron

Why are you adding your own text to my quote? Is it because you're so incapable of countering the pure facts with your mindlessly generated propaganda that you need to alter what was initially said? You sir, are Canadian. That's all you'll ever be.
Back to top
Frax
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8489
Location: Fuck yoiu fucking fuckers



PostPosted: 05/11/04 - 17:17    Post subject: Reply with quote

Booker wrote:
some of our soldiers did publically humiliate iraqi prisoners; i would be mad also.

you cannot expect them to have the same worldview and moral values as you do.


And the difference is? US Soldiers who abuse iraqi prisoners.. will be going to jail. These terrorists will continue to kill and stir up shit as long as they are alive, no one will punish them but us. Occasionally they get one of us, in return we get 50 of them. Seems like a pretty good trade off to keep Starbucks and McDonalds and HBO and Wal-mart in business to me.

Is it a shame that this guy was murdered? Yep, but be realistic, the world f*****g sucks. Life is cheap in most of the world other than North America and parts of Europe, and always has been. This kind of shit goes on everyday around the world, some of you only seem to get this exaggerated outrage when it happens to an "american". The world has never been some happy happy joy joy fluffy place with flowers and bunnies and everyone farting rose petals. Get real.

Two estimates in this http://cnn.netscape.cnn.com/news/story.jsp?floc=FF-APO-1107&idq=/ff/story/0001%2F20040511%2F1622066025.htm&sc=1107&photoid=20031214LON129 article put Saddam Hussein's genocide numbers anywhere between 300,000 and 1,000,000. Tell me again why it is so bad for us to be in Iraq?
Back to top
Luturb
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 4042
Location: Livermore, California



PostPosted: 05/11/04 - 17:35    Post subject: Reply with quote

Right on Frax. This kind of thing was happening in Iraq on a regular basis for many years before the US got there. What US soldiers did to Iraqis, as wrong as it was, was small potatoes compared to what happened daily under Hussein's rule. You think being stripped naked and having your picture taken with a buch of other guys is bad, try being a pretty girl at the college where the Hussein boys went to school and being picked up of the street, raped my multiple people, and then murdered with absolutely no repercussions for the people that did it. The difference is the people doing these things for Hussein were rewarded for it, while the Americans are going to go to jail.

Does one contractor getting his head chopped off change anything? No. It's too bad for his family, but it's a war and that kind of stuff happens.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5   Next
Page 1 of 5

Related topics:
DirectX 10 doesn't work with Vanguard?
BlackCats COnfrimation Doesn't Work!!!
hahaha.. crime doesn't pay...
"Yeah I know it doesn't matter" post by Kbarr
WTB Horde Druid 40+ US Pve/Pvp - Doesn't Matter.
I hope this movie doesn't suck
buying lvl 85+ ranger!!!!doesn't hav to be member!
Siege weapon in Warhammer Online doesn't work
It doesn't make any sense
Power Leveling in City of Heroes doesn't working!
Who else doesn't like doing work
Ok this article is good but one part doesn't make sense.
need places to hunt...thottbot doesn't help too much
WTB Downloader that doesn't suck terribly
My background music doesn't loop.
my wife who doesn't know she's married..
Comments and reviews on article "Runescape 3? NO, It doesn't exist!"
Bush doesn't care about your hemorrhoids
LOTRO Medium armor doesn't look so good
it doesn't stop at jackass!