Whos actions put the American people are more risk ? :: Ultimate MMORPG Gaming Community & Trading Zone

Brash
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 20 Oct 2002
Posts: 3958

Posted: 10/18/04 - 12:19 Post subject: Whos actions put the American people are more risk ?

who do you think is a bigger danger to the united states ?

Back to top

Frax
RealPoor Master of Posts

Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8489
Location: Fuck yoiu fucking fuckers

Posted: 10/18/04 - 12:23 Post subject:

I think rap music is more of a danger than either of the choices

Back to top

Brash
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 20 Oct 2002
Posts: 3958

Posted: 10/18/04 - 16:49 Post subject:

if i could id add rap music because i aslo think i is a bigger danger than sadam ever was to the US

Back to top

Confused
RealPoor Master of Posts

Joined: 08 Feb 2004
Posts: 6730

Posted: 10/18/04 - 17:04 Post subject:

Learn to spell Saddam.

Back to top

themy
Sir Postalot

Joined: 14 Oct 2002
Posts: 1153

Posted: 10/18/04 - 19:10 Post subject:

Confused wrote:

Learn to spell Saddam.

LOL

and brash, your polls are retarded. almost as retarded as you, but not quite.

Back to top

Brash
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 20 Oct 2002
Posts: 3958

Posted: 10/21/04 - 01:03 Post subject:

i really thought bush would win this one /

Back to top

Guest

Posted: 10/21/04 - 01:06 Post subject:

Youve got to take into account the Bush supporters who would back Bush if Bush got 666 tatooed to his forhead and got crab claws surgically grafted to his wrists

Back to top

Merican
Sir Postalot

Joined: 05 Mar 2003
Posts: 1491

Posted: 10/21/04 - 01:11 Post subject:

We would be worse under Kerry... if he pulled us out of iraq Wed get hit by another terrorist attack, then hed look like the biggestt moron ever.. Even more then he is.

Back to top

Guest

Posted: 10/21/04 - 01:23 Post subject:

Merican wrote:

We would be worse under Kerry... if he pulled us out of iraq Wed get hit by another terrorist attack, then hed look like the biggestt moron ever.. Even more then he is.

Back to top

Merican
Sir Postalot

Joined: 05 Mar 2003
Posts: 1491

Posted: 10/21/04 - 01:26 Post subject:

Jack Crow wrote:

Merican wrote:

We would be worse under Kerry... if he pulled us out of iraq Wed get hit by another terrorist attack, then hed look like the biggestt moron ever.. Even more then he is.

im voting for him!

Back to top

Brash
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 20 Oct 2002
Posts: 3958

Posted: 10/21/04 - 15:38 Post subject:

Jack Crow wrote:

Youve got to take into account the Bush supporters who would back Bush if Bush got 666 tatooed to his forhead and got crab claws surgically grafted to his wrists

really..

i think he could come out and say that he is 100 % for f*****g each and everyone of your grandmothers and then blowing his wad in thier eyes and he would still gte like 20% of the vote.

Back to top

Silvermouse
RealPoor Jedi

Joined: 12 Oct 2002
Posts: 11015

Posted: 10/21/04 - 15:56 Post subject:

Jack Crow wrote:

Youve got to take into account the Bush supporters who would back Bush if Bush got 666 tatooed to his forhead and got crab claws surgically grafted to his wrists

I'd vote for him if he did that.

Back to top

Silvermouse
RealPoor Jedi

Joined: 12 Oct 2002
Posts: 11015

Posted: 10/21/04 - 15:57 Post subject:

Frax wrote:

I think rap music is more of a danger than either of the choices

I wholeheartedly agree. Rap music, and hip-hop in general, is leading to the degradation of our youth. Parents need to take control.

Back to top

Devook
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 31 Mar 2004
Posts: 2373
Location: Ypsilanti or Troy, MI

Posted: 10/21/04 - 16:04 Post subject:

Isn't saddam in jail?

Back to top

goatface
Sir Postalot

Joined: 12 Oct 2002
Posts: 1354

Posted: 10/21/04 - 17:31 Post subject:

last time i saw him, he was armed with an ink pen i was scared

Back to top

Melee
Luke Warm

Joined: 24 Mar 2003
Posts: 185

Posted: 10/21/04 - 23:45 Post subject:

Jack Crow wrote:

Merican wrote:

We would be worse under Kerry... if he pulled us out of iraq Wed get hit by another terrorist attack, then hed look like the biggestt moron ever.. Even more then he is.

well considering Bush couldn't pass an 8th grade history test. Your just asking for it, ... if you call Kerry a moron.

Back to top

Confused
RealPoor Master of Posts

Joined: 08 Feb 2004
Posts: 6730

Posted: 10/22/04 - 02:46 Post subject:

Melee wrote:

Jack Crow wrote:

Merican wrote:

We would be worse under Kerry... if he pulled us out of iraq Wed get hit by another terrorist attack, then hed look like the biggestt moron ever.. Even more then he is.

well considering Bush couldn't pass an 8th grade history test. Your just asking for it, ... if you call Kerry a moron.

Considering you can't discern between "your" and "you're"...

Back to top

Tolanin
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 3551

Posted: 10/22/04 - 05:25 Post subject:

Confused wrote:

Melee wrote:

Jack Crow wrote:

Merican wrote:

We would be worse under Kerry... if he pulled us out of iraq Wed get hit by another terrorist attack, then hed look like the biggestt moron ever.. Even more then he is.

well considering Bush couldn't pass an 8th grade history test. Your just asking for it, ... if you call Kerry a moron.

Considering you can't discern between "your" and "you're"...

simple mastery of writting and proper spelling does not make a person intelligent, you should know that... such a weak and stupid arguement to suggest it does.

Bush may be a complete genius or a complete fool, only time will tell, there is not enough information to judge, yet.

Back to top

Confused
RealPoor Master of Posts

Joined: 08 Feb 2004
Posts: 6730

Posted: 10/22/04 - 05:41 Post subject:

Tolanin wrote:

simple mastery of writting and proper spelling does not make a person intelligent, you should know that... such a weak and stupid arguement to suggest it does.

Actually they correlate very well, with a correlation coefficient of 0.42 (which is very high by psychological standards). So, except in cases of dyslexia, someone who does not know how to spell something as simple as "you're", "writing" or "argument" can be expected to lack intelligence.

Back to top

Tolanin
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 3551

Posted: 10/22/04 - 06:02 Post subject:

Confused wrote:

Tolanin wrote:

simple mastery of writting and proper spelling does not make a person intelligent, you should know that... such a weak and stupid arguement to suggest it does.

Actually they correlate very well, with a correlation coefficient of 0.42 (which is very high by psychological standards). So, except in cases of dyslexia, someone who does not know how to spell something as simple as "you're", "writing" or "argument" can be expected to lack intelligence.

knowledge and application of knowledge however are different things... to assume that he does not know the difference simply because he does not demonstrate it over a very very informal medium would be unwise.

Back to top

Confused
RealPoor Master of Posts

Joined: 08 Feb 2004
Posts: 6730

Posted: 10/22/04 - 12:27 Post subject:

Tolanin wrote:

Confused wrote:

Tolanin wrote:

simple mastery of writting and proper spelling does not make a person intelligent, you should know that... such a weak and stupid arguement to suggest it does.

Actually they correlate very well, with a correlation coefficient of 0.42 (which is very high by psychological standards). So, except in cases of dyslexia, someone who does not know how to spell something as simple as "you're", "writing" or "argument" can be expected to lack intelligence.

knowledge and application of knowledge however are different things... to assume that he does not know the difference simply because he does not demonstrate it over a very very informal medium would be unwise.

This is a good example of failing to apply knowledge.

Back to top

Silvermouse
RealPoor Jedi

Joined: 12 Oct 2002
Posts: 11015

Posted: 10/22/04 - 12:38 Post subject:

I think what it is is that people are failing to understand the meaning of contractions. For instance, "who's" and "whose". "Who's" is a contraction for "who is", but I see people writing "Who's is it", when it should be "Whose is it". I agree with Confused here. The only time you should make a mistake like that is if you're typing quickly or not paying attention. It's basic, 3rd grade grammar! =/ There's theirs We're were Your you're Whose who's

Back to top

Dyers
Sir Postalot

Joined: 26 Oct 2002
Posts: 1269

Posted: 10/22/04 - 12:49 Post subject:

Confused wrote:

Tolanin wrote:

Confused wrote:

Tolanin wrote:

simple mastery of writting and proper spelling does not make a person intelligent, you should know that... such a weak and stupid arguement to suggest it does.

Actually they correlate very well, with a correlation coefficient of 0.42 (which is very high by psychological standards). So, except in cases of dyslexia, someone who does not know how to spell something as simple as "you're", "writing" or "argument" can be expected to lack intelligence.

knowledge and application of knowledge however are different things... to assume that he does not know the difference simply because he does not demonstrate it over a very very informal medium would be unwise.

This is a good example of failing to apply knowledge.

What can you expect from an idiot that has a swastika for an avatar?

Back to top

Tolanin
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 3551

Posted: 10/22/04 - 16:22 Post subject:

Silvermouse wrote:

I think what it is is that people are failing to understand the meaning of contractions.

For instance, "who's" and "whose". "Who's" is a contraction for "who is", but I see people writing "Who's is it", when it should be "Whose is it".

I agree with Confused here. The only time you should make a mistake like that is if you're typing quickly or not paying attention. It's basic, 3rd grade grammar! =/

There's theirs
We're were
Your you're
Whose who's

Maybe, still I think generally people type quickly here, rather than carefully.. atleast I do.

Back to top

Teutates
Luke Warm

Joined: 12 Sep 2004
Posts: 232
Location: At her computer

Posted: 10/22/04 - 19:57 Post subject:

You could also use the argument that the gaming industry has either destroyed language or cropped a new language of it's own. In that instance the standards of currently acceptable English would not apply. In fact one could go as far to say that this is the first steps into evolving the language yet again into something new and free. Someone speaking say 16th or 17th century english would certainly say that the context and slangs we use were definitely not proper. So it goes back to a form of perception that there is only one way. Might as well put blinders on and never change if that's the case.

Back to top

Scrabler
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 2660
Location: Mobile, AL

Posted: 10/22/04 - 20:00 Post subject:

Teutates wrote:

You could also use the argument that the gaming industry has either destroyed language or cropped a new language of it's own. In that instance the standards of currently acceptable English would not apply. In fact one could go as far to say that this is the first steps into evolving the language yet again into something new and free. Someone speaking say 16th or 17th century english would certainly say that the context and slangs we use were definitely not proper. So it goes back to a form of perception that there is only one way. Might as well put blinders on and never change if that's the case.

Change is always a good thing?

Back to top

Teutates
Luke Warm

Joined: 12 Sep 2004
Posts: 232
Location: At her computer

Posted: 10/22/04 - 20:04 Post subject:

Scrabler wrote:

Teutates wrote:

You could also use the argument that the gaming industry has either destroyed language or cropped a new language of it's own. In that instance the standards of currently acceptable English would not apply. In fact one could go as far to say that this is the first steps into evolving the language yet again into something new and free. Someone speaking say 16th or 17th century english would certainly say that the context and slangs we use were definitely not proper. So it goes back to a form of perception that there is only one way. Might as well put blinders on and never change if that's the case.

Change is always a good thing?

I wouldn't agree with that statement, but i would say that it is necessary to propagate.

Last edited by Teutates on 10/22/04 - 20:41; edited 1 time in total

Back to top

Tolanin
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 3551

Posted: 10/22/04 - 20:37 Post subject:

Scrabler wrote:

Teutates wrote:

You could also use the argument that the gaming industry has either destroyed language or cropped a new language of it's own. In that instance the standards of currently acceptable English would not apply. In fact one could go as far to say that this is the first steps into evolving the language yet again into something new and free. Someone speaking say 16th or 17th century english would certainly say that the context and slangs we use were definitely not proper. So it goes back to a form of perception that there is only one way. Might as well put blinders on and never change if that's the case.

Change is always a good thing?

good or bad it is inevitable...

Back to top

Whos actions put the American people are more risk ?

LIFEFORM SOCIAL COMMUNITY NETWORK