|
|
| Author |
Message |
kbarr
RealPoor Jedi
Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Posts: 11239
Location: New York, now go fuck off...
|
 Posted: 12/28/04 - 21:24 Post subject: The reason I am correct on every issue.
|
|
|
| Quote: | | Mensa is an international society that has one - and only one - qualification for membership: a score in the top 2% of the population on a standardized intelligence test. |
http://www.us.mensa.org/join_mensa/testscores.php3
| Quote: | Army GCT*** prior to 10/80
Score : 136
*** The only scores that Mensa can accept are the AGCT scores from the Army and the GT scores from the Navy - before the use of the ASVAB (9/80). The new military tests are vocational aptitude tests and are not suitable for Mensa admission. |
Lookie!
I scored 136 on my GT test from 1979. That means I can join Mensa!
And some people here wondered if I was a true genius or not. Well, I guess this answers THAT question!
I eat these with eggs every morning, I wonder....
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
principessa
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 3149
|
|
Posted: 12/28/04 - 22:08 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
Kbarr, PLEASE tell me that, as a New Yorker, you do NOT eat that shit....ROFL....
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
lauren000
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 21 Oct 2002
Posts: 3510
Location: colorado springs
|
|
Posted: 12/28/04 - 22:08 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
that means you can apply to take mensa's test, and if you pass it you're a member. I know members of mensa, and you obviously couldn't hack it, because you didn't read the instructions.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
kbarr
RealPoor Jedi
Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Posts: 11239
Location: New York, now go fuck off...
|
|
Posted: 12/28/04 - 22:15 Post subject:
|
|
|
| lauren000 wrote: | | that means you can apply to take mensa's test, and if you pass it you're a member. I know members of mensa, and you obviously couldn't hack it, because you didn't read the instructions. |
Read the site freak, you stealth homosexual, its says quite clearly that when I took the test doesn't matter. It only matters in regards to when a particular test was given. All GT scores before 10/1980 are good, after that date they aren't good. This was because of a change in how the military did their testing. I took it in 1979, I'm a muthafuckn GENIUS!
Now, you need to kill yourself. Get on with it.
Last edited by kbarr on 12/28/04 - 22:17; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
kbarr
RealPoor Jedi
Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Posts: 11239
Location: New York, now go fuck off...
|
|
Posted: 12/28/04 - 22:16 Post subject:
|
|
|
| principessa wrote: | | Kbarr, PLEASE tell me that, as a New Yorker, you do NOT eat that shit....ROFL.... |
It has its benefits.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Paco
RealPoor Jedi
Joined: 13 Oct 2002
Posts: 12939
Location: Jacksonville, FL
|
|
Posted: 12/28/04 - 22:16 Post subject:
|
|
|
| lauren000 wrote: | | that means you can apply to take mensa's test, and if you pass it you're a member. I know members of mensa, and you obviously couldn't hack it, because you didn't read the instructions. |
I call b******t on your claim, just like all of your "facts" you post. If they knew you were cutting off your d**k, they'd talk you out of it. Furthermore, they'd tell you that you should have paid more attention in school.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
lauren000
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 21 Oct 2002
Posts: 3510
Location: colorado springs
|
|
Posted: 12/28/04 - 22:21 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
you two obviously are more intelligent than me lollze
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Qaldyin
Sir Postalot
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 1346
|
|
Posted: 12/28/04 - 22:22 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
Lol...I could give a shit less dude. People (for the most part) read this board to have a laugh. Some people like Kbarr, Lauren, Paco etc take this shit way too far and incorporate this board into their lives. Just like someone plays a game, they patrol the board and post a lot. I'm clapping for you dude, but you have nothing to prove to any of us lol.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
kbarr
RealPoor Jedi
Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Posts: 11239
Location: New York, now go fuck off...
|
|
Posted: 12/28/04 - 22:22 Post subject:
|
|
|
| lauren000 wrote: | | you two obviously are more intelligent than me lollze |
Sometimes....
All it takes is a little reading.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
kbarr
RealPoor Jedi
Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Posts: 11239
Location: New York, now go fuck off...
|
|
Posted: 12/28/04 - 22:23 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Qaldyin wrote: | | Lol...I could give a shit less dude. People (for the most part) read this board to have a laugh. Some people like Kbarr, Lauren, Paco etc take this shit way too far and incorporate this board into their lives. Just like someone plays a game, they patrol the board and post a lot. I'm clapping for you dude, but you have nothing to prove to any of us lol. |
But you did respond.
Now get f*****g clapping, I can't hear you.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Soriak
Toomuchtimeonhands
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 952
|
|
Posted: 12/28/04 - 22:27 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Quote: |
American Mensa accepts your MasterCard or Visa as well as your checking account information for online payments.
|
You, too, can be "special" for only a small fee.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posted: 12/28/04 - 23:05 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Vekril
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 15 Oct 2002
Posts: 2525
Location: Jersey
|
|
Posted: 12/29/04 - 06:13 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Quote: | SAT or CEEB
scored prior to 9/30/74 1300
scored from 9/30/74 through 1/31/94 1250
scored after 1/31/94 N/A
|
haha
hahaha
hahahaha
Above a 1250 SAT? I thought Mensa was supposed to be an exclusive club. I think my high school (public) graduating class had somewhere around 25-30 people in a class of 300 score over a 1250, almost 10%. We had more than 5 break 1400. I would have guessed the SAT cutoff was 1500, 1450 at the minimum for the old test.
| Quote: | LSAT
prior to 1982 662
1982 through 5/91 39
effective 6/91 163
|
Again, what a joke. A 168 score puts you in the top 1%, a 163 is maybe top 5% of scores at best. I do not think the top 5% of an already prescreened pool qualifies you as a genius.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Aviger
RealPoor Sensei
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 1509
|
|
Posted: 12/29/04 - 07:03 Post subject:
|
|
|
well looks like i am right to then kbarr 
I did a mensa acceptence test and according to them i'm part of the upper 2%.
Time to start hating liberals!
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Nuldaan
Sir Postalot
Joined: 07 Nov 2002
Posts: 1179
|
|
Posted: 12/29/04 - 07:43 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Vekril wrote: | | Quote: | SAT or CEEB
scored prior to 9/30/74 1300
scored from 9/30/74 through 1/31/94 1250
scored after 1/31/94 N/A
|
haha
hahaha
hahahaha
Above a 1250 SAT? I thought Mensa was supposed to be an exclusive club. I think my high school (public) graduating class had somewhere around 25-30 people in a class of 300 score over a 1250, almost 10%. We had more than 5 break 1400. I would have guessed the SAT cutoff was 1500, 1450 at the minimum for the old test.
| Quote: | LSAT
prior to 1982 662
1982 through 5/91 39
effective 6/91 163
|
Again, what a joke. A 168 score puts you in the top 1%, a 163 is maybe top 5% of scores at best. I do not think the top 5% of an already prescreened pool qualifies you as a genius. |
Well, let's be fair here, it's the top 2%, not the top 0.01%. Of course, accepting any sort of knowledge based test (such as the SAT) is a complete joke. Even so, MENSA's requirements aren't really that strict.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Aviger
RealPoor Sensei
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 1509
|
|
Posted: 12/29/04 - 07:49 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
true, 2% of 6 billion is still what, like 100+ millino people heh
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Goraz
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 3736
Location: Philadelphia
|
|
Posted: 12/29/04 - 10:51 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Kbarr wrote: | | lauren000 wrote: | | you two obviously are more intelligent than me lollze |
Sometimes....
All it takes is a little reading. |
All it takes is a little c**k attachment too.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
kbarr
RealPoor Jedi
Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Posts: 11239
Location: New York, now go fuck off...
|
|
Posted: 12/29/04 - 17:41 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Vekril wrote: | | Quote: | SAT or CEEB
scored prior to 9/30/74 1300
scored from 9/30/74 through 1/31/94 1250
scored after 1/31/94 N/A
|
haha
hahaha
hahahaha
Above a 1250 SAT? I thought Mensa was supposed to be an exclusive club. I think my high school (public) graduating class had somewhere around 25-30 people in a class of 300 score over a 1250, almost 10%. We had more than 5 break 1400. I would have guessed the SAT cutoff was 1500, 1450 at the minimum for the old test.
| Quote: | LSAT
prior to 1982 662
1982 through 5/91 39
effective 6/91 163
|
Again, what a joke. A 168 score puts you in the top 1%, a 163 is maybe top 5% of scores at best. I do not think the top 5% of an already prescreened pool qualifies you as a genius. |
Mensa says I'm a genius. So let it be written, so let it be done!
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
wellspoken
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 7137
|
|
Posted: 12/29/04 - 17:57 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Kbarr wrote: | | Vekril wrote: | | Quote: | SAT or CEEB
scored prior to 9/30/74 1300
scored from 9/30/74 through 1/31/94 1250
scored after 1/31/94 N/A
|
haha
hahaha
hahahaha
Above a 1250 SAT? I thought Mensa was supposed to be an exclusive club. I think my high school (public) graduating class had somewhere around 25-30 people in a class of 300 score over a 1250, almost 10%. We had more than 5 break 1400. I would have guessed the SAT cutoff was 1500, 1450 at the minimum for the old test.
| Quote: | LSAT
prior to 1982 662
1982 through 5/91 39
effective 6/91 163
|
Again, what a joke. A 168 score puts you in the top 1%, a 163 is maybe top 5% of scores at best. I do not think the top 5% of an already prescreened pool qualifies you as a genius. |
Mensa says I'm a genius. So let it be written, so let it be done!
|
More like idiot.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
kbarr
RealPoor Jedi
Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Posts: 11239
Location: New York, now go fuck off...
|
|
Posted: 12/29/04 - 17:59 Post subject:
|
|
|
| wellspoken wrote: | | Kbarr wrote: | | Vekril wrote: | | Quote: | SAT or CEEB
scored prior to 9/30/74 1300
scored from 9/30/74 through 1/31/94 1250
scored after 1/31/94 N/A
|
haha
hahaha
hahahaha
Above a 1250 SAT? I thought Mensa was supposed to be an exclusive club. I think my high school (public) graduating class had somewhere around 25-30 people in a class of 300 score over a 1250, almost 10%. We had more than 5 break 1400. I would have guessed the SAT cutoff was 1500, 1450 at the minimum for the old test.
| Quote: | LSAT
prior to 1982 662
1982 through 5/91 39
effective 6/91 163
|
Again, what a joke. A 168 score puts you in the top 1%, a 163 is maybe top 5% of scores at best. I do not think the top 5% of an already prescreened pool qualifies you as a genius. |
Mensa says I'm a genius. So let it be written, so let it be done!
|
More like idiot. |
Mensa knows better than you.
I am da GENIUS!
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
wellspoken
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 7137
|
|
Posted: 12/29/04 - 18:02 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Kbarr wrote: | | wellspoken wrote: | | Kbarr wrote: | | Vekril wrote: | | Quote: | SAT or CEEB
scored prior to 9/30/74 1300
scored from 9/30/74 through 1/31/94 1250
scored after 1/31/94 N/A
|
haha
hahaha
hahahaha
Above a 1250 SAT? I thought Mensa was supposed to be an exclusive club. I think my high school (public) graduating class had somewhere around 25-30 people in a class of 300 score over a 1250, almost 10%. We had more than 5 break 1400. I would have guessed the SAT cutoff was 1500, 1450 at the minimum for the old test.
| Quote: | LSAT
prior to 1982 662
1982 through 5/91 39
effective 6/91 163
|
Again, what a joke. A 168 score puts you in the top 1%, a 163 is maybe top 5% of scores at best. I do not think the top 5% of an already prescreened pool qualifies you as a genius. |
Mensa says I'm a genius. So let it be written, so let it be done!
|
More like idiot. |
Mensa knows better than you.
I am da GENIUS! |
ok.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posted: 12/29/04 - 18:08 Post subject: Re: The reason I am correct on every issue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
principessa
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 3149
|
|
Posted: 12/29/04 - 18:16 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
Ok, that picture is....disturbing....
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
kbarr
RealPoor Jedi
Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Posts: 11239
Location: New York, now go fuck off...
|
|
Posted: 12/29/04 - 18:31 Post subject:
|
|
|
| principessa wrote: | | Ok, that picture is....disturbing.... |
That picture was from just before I read the Mensa site.
I look like this now.
And I feel like some nice matzah ball soup.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
kbarr
RealPoor Jedi
Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Posts: 11239
Location: New York, now go fuck off...
|
|
Posted: 12/29/04 - 21:51 Post subject: The GENIUS is taking any and all questions.
|
|
|
Stupid people.
I am here for you.
What do you need to know?
| Quote: | Main Entry: ge·nius
Pronunciation: 'jEn-y&s, 'jE-nE-&s
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural ge·nius·es or ge·nii /-nE-"I/
Etymology: Latin, tutelary spirit, natural inclinations, from gignere to beget
1 a plural genii : an attendant spirit of a person or place b plural usually genii : a person who influences another for good or bad
2 : a strong leaning or inclination : PENCHANT
3 a : a peculiar, distinctive, or identifying character or spirit b : the associations and traditions of a place c : a personification or embodiment especially of a quality or condition
4 plural usually genii : SPIRIT, JINNI
5 plural usually geniuses a : a single strongly marked capacity or aptitude <had a genius for getting along with boys -- Mary Ross> b : extraordinary intellectual power especially as manifested in creative activity c : a person endowed with transcendent mental superiority; especially : a person with a very high intelligence quotient |
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Soriak
Toomuchtimeonhands
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 952
|
|
Posted: 12/29/04 - 22:10 Post subject: Re: The GENIUS is taking any and all questions.
|
|
|
| Kbarr wrote: | Stupid people.
I am here for you.
What do you need to know?
| Quote: | Main Entry: ge·nius
Pronunciation: 'jEn-y&s, 'jE-nE-&s
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural ge·nius·es or ge·nii /-nE-"I/
Etymology: Latin, tutelary spirit, natural inclinations, from gignere to beget
1 a plural genii : an attendant spirit of a person or place b plural usually genii : a person who influences another for good or bad
2 : a strong leaning or inclination : PENCHANT
3 a : a peculiar, distinctive, or identifying character or spirit b : the associations and traditions of a place c : a personification or embodiment especially of a quality or condition
4 plural usually genii : SPIRIT, JINNI
5 plural usually geniuses a : a single strongly marked capacity or aptitude <had a genius for getting along with boys -- Mary Ross> b : extraordinary intellectual power especially as manifested in creative activity c : a person endowed with transcendent mental superiority; especially : a person with a very high intelligence quotient |
|
What is the only International Units system still based on an artifact?
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
kbarr
RealPoor Jedi
Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Posts: 11239
Location: New York, now go fuck off...
|
|
Posted: 12/29/04 - 22:24 Post subject: Re: The GENIUS is taking any and all questions.
|
|
|
| Soriak wrote: | | Kbarr wrote: | Stupid people.
I am here for you.
What do you need to know?
| Quote: | Main Entry: ge·nius
Pronunciation: 'jEn-y&s, 'jE-nE-&s
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural ge·nius·es or ge·nii /-nE-"I/
Etymology: Latin, tutelary spirit, natural inclinations, from gignere to beget
1 a plural genii : an attendant spirit of a person or place b plural usually genii : a person who influences another for good or bad
2 : a strong leaning or inclination : PENCHANT
3 a : a peculiar, distinctive, or identifying character or spirit b : the associations and traditions of a place c : a personification or embodiment especially of a quality or condition
4 plural usually genii : SPIRIT, JINNI
5 plural usually geniuses a : a single strongly marked capacity or aptitude <had a genius for getting along with boys -- Mary Ross> b : extraordinary intellectual power especially as manifested in creative activity c : a person endowed with transcendent mental superiority; especially : a person with a very high intelligence quotient |
|
What is the only International Units system still based on an artifact? |
Define artifact.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
sinrakin
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 7044
|
|
Posted: 12/29/04 - 22:32 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
The standard kilogram. All the other units are based on fundamental physical constants, but the standard kilogram is a block of platinum alloy in a vault somewhere.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
sinrakin
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 7044
|
|
Posted: 12/29/04 - 22:32 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
wtf
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Soriak
Toomuchtimeonhands
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 952
|
|
Posted: 12/29/04 - 23:54 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
you lose sinrakin - not because the answer is wrong, but because you weren't supposed to answer it =/
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
