The time now is 09/07/08 - 02:14
Log in: Username: Password:
Search forums for:
  

Nuclear Iran

Post new topic   Reply to topic
Author Message
Vengar_OO
Sir Postalot
Sir Postalot


Joined: 30 Nov 2002
Posts: 1029
Location: Mayport, FL



PostPosted: 06/12/04 - 20:26    Post subject: Nuclear Iran Reply with quote

Iran says it's entitled to be a nuclear power

however comma

we don't think so.

Are we correct because they have a secret nuclear weapons program, or are we wrong, they should be entitled to build their own nuclear facilities for energy purposes only?

Thoughts?





http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,122526,00.html

TEHRAN, Iran — Toughening its stance in advance of a meeting of the U.N. nuclear watchdog agency, Iran (search) on Saturday said it would reject international restrictions on its nuclear program and challenged the world to accept Tehran as a member of the "nuclear club."

Foreign Minister Kamal Kharrazi (search) rejected further outside influence on Tehran's nuclear ambitions two days before the International Atomic Energy Agency board of governors meets to discuss Iran's highly controversial program.

"We won't accept any new obligations," Kharrazi said. "Iran has a high technical capability and has to be recognized by the international community as a member of the nuclear club. This is an irreversible path."

Iran has repeatedly insisted its nuclear program is geared toward generating electricity, not making weapons, but the United States and its allies say Tehran has a secret nuclear weapons program. The IAEA (search) has wrestled with the dilemma for more than a year.

Iran has already suspended uranium enrichment and stopped building centrifuges. It has also allowed IAEA inspections of its nuclear facilities without prior notice, part of the additional protocol to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (search) that still must be approved by parliament.

Kharrazi insisted that Iran would not give up its development of the nuclear fuel cycle, the steps for processing and enriching uranium necessary for both nuclear energy and nuclear weapons. Iran says it has achieved the full cycle, but is not now enriching uranium.

"That somebody demands that we give up the nuclear fuel cycle ... is an additional demand," Kharrazi said, apparently referring to demands by U.S. and European countries that Iran halt operations of a plant it inaugurated in March in Isfahan, central Iran, that processes uranium into gas. The demand also calls for aborting plans to build a heavy water reactor in Arak, another city in central Iran.

"We can't accept such an additional demand, which is contrary to our legal and legitimate rights," he said. "No one in Iran can make a decision to deny the nation of something that is a source of pride."

Iran has confirmed possessing technology to extract uranium ore, processing it into a powder called yellow cake (search) and then converting it into gas. The gas is then injected into centrifuges for low-grade enrichment that turns it into fuel for nuclear reactors.

Uranium enriched to low levels has energy uses, while highly enriched uranium can be used in bombs.

Iran suspended uranium enrichment last year under mounting international pressure. In April, it said it had stopped building centrifuges. IAEA inspectors had found traces of highly enriched uranium at two sites, which Iranian officials have maintained was from contaminated imported materials.

Kharrazi condemned a draft resolution critical of Iran drawn up by Germany, France and Britain and being debated before the IAEA board meeting Monday which says Iran's cooperation has not been complete.

"The draft resolution is unacceptable unless changes are made so that it can be acceptable to all parties," he said.

The minister said insistence by Europeans on "very tiny issues is contrary to the spirit of cooperation." He said that by doing so, the European countries are bowing to U.S. pressure and showing a "lack of independence."

Kharrazi warned that failure in settling the debate over Iran's nuclear dossier will be a "failure for all," including Iran, Europe and the IAEA.

The minister confirmed Iran's efforts to buy 4,000 magnets needed for uranium enrichment equipment, saying the issue was blown out of proportion. He did not say where the magnets were bought.

Diplomats told The Associated Press in Vienna that Iran had acknowledged inquiring about 4,000 magnets needed for uranium enrichment equipment with a European black-market supplier and had dangled the possibility of buying a "higher number."

"If everybody is looking to settle this issue (Iran's nuclear dossier), they have to look at it in a broad outlook," Kharrazi said.

IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei (search) said last month his agency had not found proof to date of a concrete link between Iran's nuclear activities and its military program, but "it was premature to make a judgment."
Back to top
Barnacle Bob
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 2135
Location: WHO KNOWS WHERE I'LL TURN UP!



PostPosted: 06/13/04 - 00:55    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why are you spelling out "comma" question mark sad face
Back to top
Guest








PostPosted: 06/13/04 - 00:57    Post subject: Reply with quote

I wonder how long it will be, before we crush them.
Back to top
Rennol
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 3741
Location: Charleston, IL



PostPosted: 06/13/04 - 01:03    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kbarr wrote:
I wonder how long it will be, before we crush them.


You don't need a comma in that sentence.
Back to top
Guest








PostPosted: 06/13/04 - 01:10    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rennol wrote:
Kbarr wrote:
I wonder how long it will be, before we crush them.


You don't need a comma in that sentence.


Noted.

/Shoves a crisp dollar bill in your shirt pocket.
Back to top
ATM Banana
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 02 Jan 2003
Posts: 8575



PostPosted: 06/13/04 - 01:13    Post subject: Reply with quote

you're paying him?


how is that insulting?


are you high or soemthing kbarr?
Back to top
Guest








PostPosted: 06/13/04 - 01:16    Post subject: Reply with quote

ATM Banana wrote:
you're paying him?


how is that insulting?


are you high or soemthing kbarr?


Cluuuuuulessssssss.
Back to top
Docter
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 21 Oct 2002
Posts: 3420



PostPosted: 06/13/04 - 11:28    Post subject: Reply with quote

If they are importing the technology, then sanctions should be applied both to Iran and the country exporting the technology.

If they are creating their own nuclear technology, then they should only be using it for commercial usage and not militaristic usage. Once they start building nuclear weapons, sanctions should be applied against them.
Back to top
lauren000
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 21 Oct 2002
Posts: 3510
Location: colorado springs



PostPosted: 06/14/04 - 14:02    Post subject: Reply with quote

I guess the fall of Iraq didn't demoralize Iran.
Back to top
sinrakin
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 7044



PostPosted: 06/14/04 - 14:04    Post subject: Reply with quote

lauren000 wrote:
I guess the fall of Iraq didn't demoralize Iran.

Conceivably, it convinced them that it's not enough just to talk big about WoMD; you need to actually have some.
Back to top
Manuva
Banned
Banned


Joined: 12 Oct 2002
Posts: 2536



PostPosted: 06/14/04 - 16:39    Post subject: Re: Nuclear Iran Reply with quote

Vengar_OO wrote:


Iran has repeatedly insisted its nuclear program is geared toward generating electricity, not making weapons



Yeah

They're only sitting on a f*****g ocean of oil over there!
Back to top
Jinu
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 2396



PostPosted: 06/14/04 - 16:45    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can almost guarantee that the US has at least some nuclear weapons targeted at every country with nuclear weapons, including Israel.

I'm guessing the same is true for everyone else that can afford it.

Anyway, I just thought it's strange that countries want so hard to be targetd for annihilation.
Back to top
Manuva
Banned
Banned


Joined: 12 Oct 2002
Posts: 2536



PostPosted: 06/14/04 - 16:50    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jinu wrote:
I can almost guarantee that the US has at least some nuclear weapons targeted at every country with nuclear weapons, including Israel.

I'm guessing the same is true for everyone else that can afford it.

Anyway, I just thought it's strange that countries want so hard to be targetd for annihilation.


I can guarantee that we have nukes targetted at cities that would astonish you. Since we can move our nukes right off any coast as we see fit and nobody can really do jack shit about it.


Chicken of the sea, anybody?
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Page 1 of 1

Related topics:
Pacemakers have Nuclear (Plutonium) Batteries?
Iran May be running covert Nuclear weapons program (NWS FAG)
North Korea agrees to drop nuclear programs.
N. Korean nuclear talks to restart
pentagon revises nuclear strike plan
US to test largest non-nuclear bomb today in florida
Kerry: I Wouldn't Respond to Nuclear Attack
Israel launches airstrikes on Iran nuclear facilities
North Korea Says It's Ready To Resume Nuclear Talks.
NK says at brink of nuclear war with the US
Michigan nuclear plant explosion, thousands die!
CNN: North Korea claims nuclear weapons, pulls out of talks