|
|
| Author |
Message |
Docter
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 21 Oct 2002
Posts: 3420
|
 Posted: 08/17/05 - 22:53 Post subject: Liberals should be proud of themselves...
|
|
|
...I guess this behavior is standard for them.
http://washingtontimes.com/national/20050817-124804-1824r.htm
| Quote: | Inside the Beltway
By John McCaslin
August 17, 2005
B-grade Gipper
We're here to report a rather bizarre, if not disturbing incident combining Hollywood and Washington, specifically this month's special film-industry screening of "The Killers," a 1964 movie starring Ronald Reagan in his final big-screen role.
On hand in Hollywood for the Aug. 4 event was a prestigious crowd of actors, actresses, writers, reviewers, scholars, researchers and film preservationists -- including "L.A. Confidential" director Curtis Hanson -- that actually erupted in cheers when Mr. Reagan "the actor" was shot and killed.
Absent the applause, it was already an eerie scene to relive, considering Mr. Reagan, later as president, was shot and nearly killed in 1981 by John Hinckley Jr.
But that's not all. The audience also broke into "malicious cheers," one man in attendance tells Inside the Beltway, when Mr. Reagan was threatened at gunpoint and pushed out of a speeding car.
Then again, was it any surprise? Consider that when the words "Also Starring Ronald Reagan" appeared on the screen during the opening credits, many in the audience booed. (There were supporters of Mr. Reagan in the crowd, given some scattered applause.)
The recent screening was part of an industry retrospective salute to director Don Siegel, who made two pictures with Mr. Reagan. The event at which the jeering took place was sponsored by the UCLA Film and Television Archive and the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences.
Mr. Hanson, who is chairman of the UCLA Film and Television Archive, introduced the film and then took a seat in the audience. Afterward, he led a discussion about the movie, joined by actor Clu Gulager, who also appeared in the film.
Mr. Gulager, says the attendee, discussed the making of the picture, including how actor Lee Marvin boasted that he intended to "bury" his fellow actors with his intimidating performance. After scenes with Angie Dickinson and Norman Fell, Mr. Marvin held up two fingers indicating he had "destroyed" them.
But Mr. Gulager told the audience that when it came to Mr. Marvin's scene with Mr. Reagan, he was taken aback at the future president's professionalism and the way Mr. Reagan couldn't be shaken like the other actors.
Mr. Gulager, the source added, appeared surprised by the audience's reaction to Mr. Reagan. "I thought Reagan was great," Mr. Gulager said.
He wasn't alone, despite the sentiment of today's Hollywood crowd.
|
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
killswitch
Luke Warm
Joined: 09 Jun 2003
Posts: 325
|
|
Posted: 08/18/05 - 00:57 Post subject: Re: Liberals should be proud of themselves...
|
|
|
| Docter wrote: | ...I guess this behavior is standard for them.
http://washingtontimes.com/national/20050817-124804-1824r.htm
| Quote: | Inside the Beltway
By John McCaslin
August 17, 2005
B-grade Gipper
We're here to report a rather bizarre, if not disturbing incident combining Hollywood and Washington, specifically this month's special film-industry screening of "The Killers," a 1964 movie starring Ronald Reagan in his final big-screen role.
On hand in Hollywood for the Aug. 4 event was a prestigious crowd of actors, actresses, writers, reviewers, scholars, researchers and film preservationists -- including "L.A. Confidential" director Curtis Hanson -- that actually erupted in cheers when Mr. Reagan "the actor" was shot and killed.
Absent the applause, it was already an eerie scene to relive, considering Mr. Reagan, later as president, was shot and nearly killed in 1981 by John Hinckley Jr.
But that's not all. The audience also broke into "malicious cheers," one man in attendance tells Inside the Beltway, when Mr. Reagan was threatened at gunpoint and pushed out of a speeding car.
Then again, was it any surprise? Consider that when the words "Also Starring Ronald Reagan" appeared on the screen during the opening credits, many in the audience booed. (There were supporters of Mr. Reagan in the crowd, given some scattered applause.)
The recent screening was part of an industry retrospective salute to director Don Siegel, who made two pictures with Mr. Reagan. The event at which the jeering took place was sponsored by the UCLA Film and Television Archive and the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences.
Mr. Hanson, who is chairman of the UCLA Film and Television Archive, introduced the film and then took a seat in the audience. Afterward, he led a discussion about the movie, joined by actor Clu Gulager, who also appeared in the film.
Mr. Gulager, says the attendee, discussed the making of the picture, including how actor Lee Marvin boasted that he intended to "bury" his fellow actors with his intimidating performance. After scenes with Angie Dickinson and Norman Fell, Mr. Marvin held up two fingers indicating he had "destroyed" them.
But Mr. Gulager told the audience that when it came to Mr. Marvin's scene with Mr. Reagan, he was taken aback at the future president's professionalism and the way Mr. Reagan couldn't be shaken like the other actors.
Mr. Gulager, the source added, appeared surprised by the audience's reaction to Mr. Reagan. "I thought Reagan was great," Mr. Gulager said.
He wasn't alone, despite the sentiment of today's Hollywood crowd.
|
|
As if conservatives have never booed or wished the death of a liberal.
I'm not saying what they did was not in poor taste (because it most certainly was) but no party has a monopoly on crass behaviour.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Brael
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 2122
|
|
Posted: 08/18/05 - 01:04 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
No, both sides do stupid shit. The difference is liberals as a whole are attempting to politicize everything and pull stupid stunts for attention which even a 6 year old would find immature. These people think it works too... humanity is f****d if it ever does.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Docter
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 21 Oct 2002
Posts: 3420
|
|
Posted: 08/18/05 - 08:46 Post subject: Re: Liberals should be proud of themselves...
|
|
|
| killswitch wrote: | | Docter wrote: | ...I guess this behavior is standard for them.
http://washingtontimes.com/national/20050817-124804-1824r.htm
| Quote: | Inside the Beltway
By John McCaslin
August 17, 2005
B-grade Gipper
We're here to report a rather bizarre, if not disturbing incident combining Hollywood and Washington, specifically this month's special film-industry screening of "The Killers," a 1964 movie starring Ronald Reagan in his final big-screen role.
On hand in Hollywood for the Aug. 4 event was a prestigious crowd of actors, actresses, writers, reviewers, scholars, researchers and film preservationists -- including "L.A. Confidential" director Curtis Hanson -- that actually erupted in cheers when Mr. Reagan "the actor" was shot and killed.
Absent the applause, it was already an eerie scene to relive, considering Mr. Reagan, later as president, was shot and nearly killed in 1981 by John Hinckley Jr.
But that's not all. The audience also broke into "malicious cheers," one man in attendance tells Inside the Beltway, when Mr. Reagan was threatened at gunpoint and pushed out of a speeding car.
Then again, was it any surprise? Consider that when the words "Also Starring Ronald Reagan" appeared on the screen during the opening credits, many in the audience booed. (There were supporters of Mr. Reagan in the crowd, given some scattered applause.)
The recent screening was part of an industry retrospective salute to director Don Siegel, who made two pictures with Mr. Reagan. The event at which the jeering took place was sponsored by the UCLA Film and Television Archive and the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences.
Mr. Hanson, who is chairman of the UCLA Film and Television Archive, introduced the film and then took a seat in the audience. Afterward, he led a discussion about the movie, joined by actor Clu Gulager, who also appeared in the film.
Mr. Gulager, says the attendee, discussed the making of the picture, including how actor Lee Marvin boasted that he intended to "bury" his fellow actors with his intimidating performance. After scenes with Angie Dickinson and Norman Fell, Mr. Marvin held up two fingers indicating he had "destroyed" them.
But Mr. Gulager told the audience that when it came to Mr. Marvin's scene with Mr. Reagan, he was taken aback at the future president's professionalism and the way Mr. Reagan couldn't be shaken like the other actors.
Mr. Gulager, the source added, appeared surprised by the audience's reaction to Mr. Reagan. "I thought Reagan was great," Mr. Gulager said.
He wasn't alone, despite the sentiment of today's Hollywood crowd.
|
|
As if conservatives have never booed or wished the death of a liberal.
I'm not saying what they did was not in poor taste (because it most certainly was) but no party has a monopoly on crass behaviour. |
Actually no...unless you count the cheering when Stalin and Lenin died...then yes.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Soriak
Toomuchtimeonhands
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 952
|
|
Posted: 08/18/05 - 09:03 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
It's not a liberal issue, or conservative issue - it's a "stupid people's issue." You'll find enough of those on both sides of the isle.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
motherface
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 12 Mar 2003
Posts: 3407
|
|
Posted: 08/18/05 - 11:02 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Brael wrote: | | The difference is liberals as a whole are attempting to politicize everything and pull stupid stunts for attention which even a 6 year old would find immature. |
You mean like, impeaching the President of the United States for getting a b*****b?
You mean like, "shutting down the government" because you don't get your way?
Get real.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Brael
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 2122
|
|
Posted: 08/18/05 - 13:06 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
I said both sides do stupid shit. Liberals (Democrats mainly) however are applying everything to an anti Bush campaign that they can and come off looking like 3 year olds with a temper tantrum as a result.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Eurotrash
Luke Warm
Joined: 30 May 2005
Posts: 101
|
|
Posted: 08/18/05 - 13:56 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
Arrr, we are Americans, we only distinguish between two political ideologies because our brains don't work well enough to realise what the political spectrum is...
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Bait Masterson
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 3842
|
|
Posted: 08/18/05 - 14:04 Post subject:
|
|
|
| motherface wrote: | | You mean like, impeaching the President of the United States for getting a b*****b? |
Im Still amazed that people act like this is not a big deal.
Let me say That as president of my country and the role model/Representative/Leader of my nation, no president in office has the right to Sully the title or office seat.
They are f*****g rolemodels, they are supposed to represent my country. Getting sucked off by a employee on my TIME on my Money Representing me is not even close to excuseable.
Then to be Busted and BOLDFACE lie about it, they should have f*****g thrown his scummy ass in jail on the f*****g spot.
He wants to do kinky shit with his wife like f**k her with frozen hot dogs, go ahead but do not sully the office of the leader of the greatest nation on earth.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Ishmael
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 03 Jun 2005
Posts: 4446
Location: The US of A
|
|
Posted: 08/18/05 - 15:57 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Bait Masterson wrote: | | motherface wrote: | | You mean like, impeaching the President of the United States for getting a b*****b? |
Im Still amazed that people act like this is not a big deal.
Let me say That as president of my country and the role model/Representative/Leader of my nation, no president in office has the right to Sully the title or office seat.
They are f*****g rolemodels, they are supposed to represent my country. Getting sucked off by a employee on my TIME on my Money Representing me is not even close to excuseable.
Then to be Busted and BOLDFACE lie about it, they should have f*****g thrown his scummy ass in jail on the f*****g spot.
He wants to do kinky shit with his wife like f**k her with frozen hot dogs, go ahead but do not sully the office of the leader of the greatest nation on earth. |
Personally I don't care what the hell the president does with his time (as long as he is at least running the country with part of it). But the lieing is the b******t part. Not the act.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Orbit
Luke Warm
Joined: 15 Oct 2002
Posts: 491
|
|
Posted: 08/18/05 - 21:20 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Brael wrote: | | No, both sides do stupid shit. The difference is liberals as a whole are attempting to politicize everything and pull stupid stunts for attention which even a 6 year old would find immature. These people think it works too... humanity is f****d if it ever does. |
Your joking right? Both side does the same shit..
Just by posting this shit here your doing it. 
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Orbit
Luke Warm
Joined: 15 Oct 2002
Posts: 491
|
|
Posted: 08/18/05 - 21:24 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Bait Masterson wrote: | | motherface wrote: | | You mean like, impeaching the President of the United States for getting a b*****b? |
Im Still amazed that people act like this is not a big deal.
Let me say That as president of my country and the role model/Representative/Leader of my nation, no president in office has the right to Sully the title or office seat.
They are f*****g rolemodels, they are supposed to represent my country. Getting sucked off by a employee on my TIME on my Money Representing me is not even close to excuseable.
Then to be Busted and BOLDFACE lie about it, they should have f*****g thrown his scummy ass in jail on the f*****g spot.
He wants to do kinky shit with his wife like f**k her with frozen hot dogs, go ahead but do not sully the office of the leader of the greatest nation on earth. |
We are going to war be cause saddem has WMD.. Thats not a lie?!?
So lieing to the whole contry is the right rolemodel?
Your such a hypocrite sometimes.
At least when Clinton lies.. people didnt have to die..
And No it wasn't a big deal it happens all the times.. It was personal shit between him and her.. And thats it It didn't hurt one single person cept his wife.. And lookie there she forgave him.. That how it suppose to be business between him and her.. Not the whole country.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Ishmael
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 03 Jun 2005
Posts: 4446
Location: The US of A
|
|
Posted: 08/18/05 - 22:26 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Orbit wrote: | | Bait Masterson wrote: | | motherface wrote: | | You mean like, impeaching the President of the United States for getting a b*****b? |
Im Still amazed that people act like this is not a big deal.
Let me say That as president of my country and the role model/Representative/Leader of my nation, no president in office has the right to Sully the title or office seat.
They are f*****g rolemodels, they are supposed to represent my country. Getting sucked off by a employee on my TIME on my Money Representing me is not even close to excuseable.
Then to be Busted and BOLDFACE lie about it, they should have f*****g thrown his scummy ass in jail on the f*****g spot.
He wants to do kinky shit with his wife like f**k her with frozen hot dogs, go ahead but do not sully the office of the leader of the greatest nation on earth. |
We are going to war be cause saddem has WMD.. Thats not a lie?!?
So lieing to the whole contry is the right rolemodel?
Your such a hypocrite sometimes.
At least when Clinton lies.. people didnt have to die..
And No it wasn't a big deal it happens all the times.. It was personal shit between him and her.. And thats it It didn't hurt one single person cept his wife.. And lookie there she forgave him.. That how it suppose to be business between him and her.. Not the whole country. |
We thought Sadaam had WMD's. That was a threat. He had to be dealt with after 15 years. We did it. That is not applicable. Get another argument, or shut the hell up.
Btw.
Are you french?
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Orbit
Luke Warm
Joined: 15 Oct 2002
Posts: 491
|
|
Posted: 08/18/05 - 23:23 Post subject:
|
|
|
Gimp boy.. Go hide behind mommy and daddy this war will be over soon!
| Quote: | We thought Sadaam had WMD's. That was a threat. He had to be dealt with after 15 years. We did it. That is not applicable. Get another argument, or shut the hell up.
|
"WE" who the f**k are you? He LIED get over it... Just like you guys bringing up clintion from over 8 years ago GET OVER IT!!!
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Scrabler
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 2660
Location: Mobile, AL
|
|
Posted: 08/18/05 - 23:42 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Orbit wrote: | Gimp boy.. Go hide behind mommy and daddy this war will be over soon!
| Quote: | We thought Sadaam had WMD's. That was a threat. He had to be dealt with after 15 years. We did it. That is not applicable. Get another argument, or shut the hell up.
|
"WE" who the f**k are you? He LIED get over it... Just like you guys bringing up clintion from over 8 years ago GET OVER IT!!! |
He didn't lie.
Hell there probably are WMDs out in the desert somewhere or just accross a border, but I don't care. I don't need more of a reason than 'lets go kick some ass!' to go fight lol.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Docter
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 21 Oct 2002
Posts: 3420
|
|
Posted: 08/19/05 - 00:14 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Orbit wrote: | Gimp boy.. Go hide behind mommy and daddy this war will be over soon!
| Quote: | We thought Sadaam had WMD's. That was a threat. He had to be dealt with after 15 years. We did it. That is not applicable. Get another argument, or shut the hell up.
|
"WE" who the f**k are you? He LIED get over it... Just like you guys bringing up clintion from over 8 years ago GET OVER IT!!! |
Then explain why the demonrats were ranting and raving about Saddam and WMD's well before Bush took office...yet did nothing about it, expect pander to the UN. The ONLY reason the liberals are up in arms about Bush...is...he's going to conclude a successful campaign in Iraq, yet he's a Republican. If a demonratic president in office had taken this initiative...THEN...the liberals would have backed him, citing how much of a serial killer Saddam was and how he was threatening Iraqi's future by killing off it's younger generation....etc...etc...etc...
Suck it up Orbit...the only "good" CINC, is a Republican. 
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Conqueso
Luke Warm
Joined: 25 Jun 2003
Posts: 388
|
|
Posted: 08/19/05 - 00:54 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Orbit wrote: | Your such a hypocrite sometimes.
At least when Clinton lies.. people didnt have to die.
|
10/05/1993 - Clinton Sending Reinforcements After Heavy Losses in Somalia
| Quote: | President Clinton said he was sending reinforcements because he was "not satisfied that we are doing everything we can to protect the young Americans that are putting their lives on the line so that hundreds of thousands of Somalis can stay alive." Note of Determination
In a speech to the convention of the A.F.L.-C.I.O. in San Francisco, he sounded a note of determination, telling the labor audience, "You may be sure that we will do whatever is necessary to protect our own forces in Somalia and to complete our mission." |
9/9/1998 - We Stand United Against Terrorism
| Quote: | | Clinton: Instead we will continue to take the fight to terrorists. Over the past several years I have intensified our effort on all fronts in this battle, apprehending terrorists wherever they are and bringing them to justice, disrupting terrorist operations, deepening counterterrorism cooperation with our allies, and isolating nations that support terrorism, protecting our computer networks, improving transportation security, combatting the threat of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons, giving law enforcement the best counterterrorism tools available. This year I appointed a national coordinator to bring the full force of our resources to bear swiftly and effectively. |
9/24/2001 - Clinton rejected military strike on bin Laden
| Quote: | | During President Clinton's final days in office, senior officials weighed a military strike against Osama bin Laden after receiving intelligence on his whereabouts. The plan was rejected over concerns the information was stale and could result in a miss or civilian casualties. |
10/16/2003 Clinton: I warned Bush about bin Laden threat
| Quote: | "In his campaign, Bush had said he thought the biggest security issue was Iraq and a national missile defense," Clinton said, according to Reuters. "I told him that in my opinion, the biggest security problem was Osama bin Laden."
Clinton told the audience his inability to convince Bush of the danger posed by al-Qaida represented "one of the two or three of the biggest disappointments that I had." |
4/22/04 - Clinton Admin. Linked OBL to Somalia Attack Before Sudan Offer
1/23/02 - Clinton's "Biggest Mistake"
| Quote: | According to Mansoor Ijaz, who served as a diplomatic troubleshooter for President Clinton in the late 1990s, bin Laden was offered by Sudanese Defense Minister Elfatih Erwa during a meeting with the CIA's Africa Bureau chief in a Virginia hotel room in March 1996.
"[The Clinton administration] did not want him to go to Somalia because, they knew that bin Laden was behind the attacks against our helicopter pilots in Black Hawk Down in Somalia in 1993," he (Ijaz) explained...
In Feb. 2002, ex-President Clinton admitted that he knew about the Sudanese offer, and personally decided to turn it down, telling a New York business group, "At the time, 1996, [bin Laden] had committed no crimes against America, so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him." |
And the most recent is now: Able Danger
Over the course of Clinton's presidency, there were 6 attacks linked to Bin Laden such as: 1993 WTC bombing, 1993 attack on U.S. Rangers in Somalia, 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, 1996 Khobar Towers attack, 1998 attack on the 2 U.S. embassies in Africa, and the 2000 attack on the USS Cole. In each instance, Clinton promised to hunt and track down the perpetrators. In actuality, Clinton was only worried about the polls and re-election. If he had more respect for the office, he would not of worried which way the wind was blowing in the polls and public opinion. He would of paid less effort on "damage control" and more effort on doing what was necessary to prevent attack after attack. No, a lot of people died for his lies.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Rycrias
Luke Warm
Joined: 21 Oct 2002
Posts: 269
Location: Indianapolis, IN
|
|
Posted: 08/19/05 - 01:02 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
Clinton couldnt bring himself to make important discisions concerning national security. He was too caught up in establishing a "legacy" that he tarnished himself by lying to congress under oath about receiving a b******b.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Ishmael
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 03 Jun 2005
Posts: 4446
Location: The US of A
|
|
Posted: 08/19/05 - 01:23 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Orbit wrote: | Gimp boy.. Go hide behind mommy and daddy this war will be over soon!
| Quote: | We thought Sadaam had WMD's. That was a threat. He had to be dealt with after 15 years. We did it. That is not applicable. Get another argument, or shut the hell up.
|
"WE" who the f**k are you? He LIED get over it... Just like you guys bringing up clintion from over 8 years ago GET OVER IT!!! |
1.) It's not important.
2.) More than just one person thought this action was necassary. No "He."
3.) I didn't bring it up.
4.) You're a d*****s.
5.) See every post after your's, and then revisit #4. Have a nice night.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Orbit
Luke Warm
Joined: 15 Oct 2002
Posts: 491
|
|
Posted: 08/19/05 - 01:46 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Conqueso wrote: | | [Over the course of Clinton's presidency, there were 6 attacks linked to Bin Laden such as: 1993 WTC bombing, 1993 attack on U.S. Rangers in Somalia, 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, 1996 Khobar Towers attack, 1998 attack on the 2 U.S. embassies in Africa, and the 2000 attack on the USS Cole. In each instance, Clinton promised to hunt and track down the perpetrators. In actuality, Clinton was only worried about the polls and re-election. If he had more respect for the office, he would not of worried which way the wind was blowing in the polls and public opinion. He would of paid less effort on "damage control" and more effort on doing what was necessary to prevent attack after attack. No, a lot of people died for his lies. |
Spam queen hits again.. We was talking about lies about having **** in the white house..
With all that spam you posted where did it even say he lied? Love how you think this clinton fault.. Gawh I love how people can read the future! Dam clinton and his magic eight ball.. Sorry but bush had all that info to and even more it seems..
Want to compare the death toll bush has done vrs Clinton. Or even want to compare the cost of this war?
In the 3 or 4 years of this war has Bush stopped terrorism? Has he caught Benny.. Looks like clinton and bush records are about the same with less deaths going to clinton..
Last edited by Orbit on 08/19/05 - 01:54; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Orbit
Luke Warm
Joined: 15 Oct 2002
Posts: 491
|
|
Posted: 08/19/05 - 01:49 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Docter wrote: |
Then explain why the demonrats were ranting and raving about Saddam and WMD's well before Bush took office...yet did nothing about it, expect pander to the UN. The ONLY reason the liberals are up in arms about Bush...is...he's going to conclude a successful campaign in Iraq, yet he's a Republican. If a demonratic president in office had taken this initiative...THEN...the liberals would have backed him, citing how much of a serial killer Saddam was and how he was threatening Iraqi's future by killing off it's younger generation....etc...etc...etc...
Suck it up Orbit...the only "good" CINC, is a Republican. |
Show me these Rants ... Please! I want to see this stating that we personally wanted to go to war with iraq. There alot of shit in this world hell more people have died in africa then Iraq.. We all know why we picked Iraq.. Got to protect our oil!
Successful your joking right? They still have no water no power and no jobs.. Yep they are on the right road. For a new terrorist state!
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Cralen
Luke Warm
Joined: 13 Oct 2002
Posts: 151
|
|
Posted: 08/19/05 - 03:58 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Orbit wrote: |
At least when Clinton lies.. people didnt have to die..
And No it wasn't a big deal it happens all the times.. It was personal shit between him and her.. And thats it It didn't hurt one single person cept his wife.. And lookie there she forgave him.. That how it suppose to be business between him and her.. Not the whole country. |
Clinton sent Cruise Missiles into an Asprin factory in the Sudan at the beginning of the Monica scandel. Lies and Death there.
Regan was reported to have never taken his suit jacket off while in the Oval Office and Clinton is busy cheating on his wife in the same chair. It is a big deal because he lied to a Grand Jury. You can even look it up but I promise you, it is against the law.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Orbit
Luke Warm
Joined: 15 Oct 2002
Posts: 491
|
|
Posted: 08/19/05 - 04:48 Post subject:
|
|
|
You people are funny. You act like cheating on someone is suppose to be public knowlegde, Sorry folks but there a point in everyones life that it mind your own business. I mean come on why was the question EVEN asked Monica wasn't complaining that she was rape or anything.. It was f*****g politics and nothing more..
So in other other word MIND YOUR OWN f*****g BUSINESS..
And ONCE again yes he lied but NO one died due to a cigar...
| Quote: | | Clinton sent Cruise Missiles into an Asprin factory in the Sudan at the beginning of the Monica scandel. Lies and Death there. |
So do we want to list all the innocent people that are dieing to this war?
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Frax
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8489
Location: Fuck yoiu fucking fuckers
|
|
Posted: 08/19/05 - 07:56 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Orbit wrote: | You people are funny. You act like cheating on someone is suppose to be public knowlegde, Sorry folks but there a point in everyones life that it mind your own business. I mean come on why was the question EVEN asked Monica wasn't complaining that she was rape or anything.. It was f*****g politics and nothing more..
So in other other word MIND YOUR OWN f*****g BUSINESS..
And ONCE again yes he lied but NO one died due to a cigar...
| Quote: | | Clinton sent Cruise Missiles into an Asprin factory in the Sudan at the beginning of the Monica scandel. Lies and Death there. |
So do we want to list all the innocent people that are dieing to this war? |
Orbit, you get dumber every time you post, and I think we all get dumber reading your posts.
A lying, cheating president should have been kicked out of office. Clinton was a scumbag. Of course your 'defense' for that is to attack GWB, because you can't defend the immorality of Clinton with anything resembling common sense.
moron.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Orbit
Luke Warm
Joined: 15 Oct 2002
Posts: 491
|
|
Posted: 08/19/05 - 09:00 Post subject:
|
|
|
Frax, when you walk on water, then get back to me.
Hypocrite.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Docter
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 21 Oct 2002
Posts: 3420
|
|
Posted: 08/19/05 - 09:17 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Orbit wrote: | | Docter wrote: |
Then explain why the demonrats were ranting and raving about Saddam and WMD's well before Bush took office...yet did nothing about it, expect pander to the UN. The ONLY reason the liberals are up in arms about Bush...is...he's going to conclude a successful campaign in Iraq, yet he's a Republican. If a demonratic president in office had taken this initiative...THEN...the liberals would have backed him, citing how much of a serial killer Saddam was and how he was threatening Iraqi's future by killing off it's younger generation....etc...etc...etc...
Suck it up Orbit...the only "good" CINC, is a Republican. |
Show me these Rants ... Please! I want to see this stating that we personally wanted to go to war with iraq. There alot of shit in this world hell more people have died in africa then Iraq.. We all know why we picked Iraq.. Got to protect our oil! |
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of m@ss destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of m@ss destruction program."
- President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
"He will use those weapons of m@ss destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
"We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of m@ss destruction programs."
- Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin (D-MI), Tom Daschle (D-SD), John Kerry ( D - MA), and others Oct. 9, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of m@ss destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 "San Fran Nan"
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of m@ss destruction and palaces for his cronies.."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
- Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of m@ss destruction and the means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of m@ss destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should @ssume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of m@ss destruction! ."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of m@ss destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F.. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years .. We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of m@ss destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do."
- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapon stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, ! 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of m@ss destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation .. And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of m@ss destruction... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of m@ss destruction is real."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
| Quote: | | Successful your joking right? They still have no water no power and no jobs.. Yep they are on the right road. For a new terrorist state! |
Guess what...the ONLY people to have water, power, and jobs during Saddam's tyranny were his politically party and cronies. NOW, the country is fast on it's way to getting it EVERYWHERE.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Ishmael
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 03 Jun 2005
Posts: 4446
Location: The US of A
|
|
Posted: 08/19/05 - 09:46 Post subject:
|
|
|
Hey Orbit..still reading every post after yours?
Good now keep going through my list of steps until you relize that you are in fact a stupid c**t. Or keep making my post count go up...either way works for me. d*****s 
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Docter
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 21 Oct 2002
Posts: 3420
|
|
Posted: 08/19/05 - 16:31 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Orbit
Luke Warm
Joined: 15 Oct 2002
Posts: 491
|
|
Posted: 08/19/05 - 17:26 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Ishmael wrote: | Hey Orbit..still reading every post after yours?
Good now keep going through my list of steps until you relize that you are in fact a stupid c**t. Or keep making my post count go up...either way works for me. d*****s |
Hey GIMP boy.. f**k off if you dont have anything to add.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Orbit
Luke Warm
Joined: 15 Oct 2002
Posts: 491
|
|
Posted: 08/19/05 - 17:28 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Docter wrote: | | Orbit wrote: | | Docter wrote: |
Then explain why the demonrats were ranting and raving about Saddam and WMD's well before Bush took office...yet did nothing about it, expect pander to the UN. The ONLY reason the liberals are up in arms about Bush...is...he's going to conclude a successful campaign in Iraq, yet he's a Republican. If a demonratic president in office had taken this initiative...THEN...the liberals would have backed him, citing how much of a serial killer Saddam was and how he was threatening Iraqi's future by killing off it's younger generation....etc...etc...etc...
Suck it up Orbit...the only "good" CINC, is a Republican. |
Show me these Rants ... Please! I want to see this stating that we personally wanted to go to war with iraq. There alot of shit in this world hell more people have died in africa then Iraq.. We all know why we picked Iraq.. Got to protect our oil! |
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of m@ss destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of m@ss destruction program."
- President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
"He will use those weapons of m@ss destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
"We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of m@ss destruction programs."
- Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin (D-MI), Tom Daschle (D-SD), John Kerry ( D - MA), and others Oct. 9, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of m@ss destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 "San Fran Nan"
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of m@ss destruction and palaces for his cronies.."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
- Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of m@ss destruction and the means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of m@ss destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should @ssume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of m@ss destruction! ."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of m@ss destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F.. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years .. We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of m@ss destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do."
- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapon stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, ! 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of m@ss destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation .. And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of m@ss destruction... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of m@ss destruction is real."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
| Quote: | | Successful your joking right? They still have no water no power and no jobs.. Yep they are on the right road. For a new terrorist state! |
Guess what...the ONLY people to have water, power, and jobs during Saddam's tyranny were his politically party and cronies. NOW, the country is fast on it's way to getting it EVERYWHERE. |
And once more where did they say we PERSONALLY wanted togo to war without the UN?
And where did you get that list I want to check this site for myself.. 
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
