Khraths newest avatar! :: Ultimate MMORPG Gaming Community & Trading Zone

Posted: 03/05/04 - 10:18

khrath

Just for cele

Posted: 03/05/04 - 10:20

Minion
Joined: 29 Apr 2003
Posts: 3458

That's f*****g awesome.

Posted: 03/05/04 - 10:20

Hohrer
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 189

hahahahaha...good shit man ^_^

Posted: 03/05/04 - 10:22

Tendias
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 38

that rules, haha

Posted: 03/05/04 - 10:25

Fanelien
Joined: 18 Jul 2003
Posts: 2181

awezum.

Posted: 03/05/04 - 10:25

Jakanden
Joined: 11 Nov 2003
Posts: 5336

THat is so sick its funny lol

Posted: 03/05/04 - 10:40

median
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 2075

Posted: 03/05/04 - 10:52

atarom

grossness.

Posted: 03/05/04 - 10:53

Celestra
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 6623

hehe, silly =)

Posted: 03/05/04 - 11:03

Spink
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 1476

http://www.realpoor.com/viewtopic.php?t=219 wrote:

avatars can not be any larger than 130x187

Posted: 03/05/04 - 11:05

Callaren
Joined: 03 Dec 2003
Posts: 1602

owned

Posted: 03/05/04 - 11:14

median
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 2075

Callaren wrote:

owned

Posted: 03/05/04 - 11:16

Fanelien
Joined: 18 Jul 2003
Posts: 2181

median wrote:

Callaren wrote:

owned

Posted: 03/05/04 - 11:19

Spink
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 1476

Fanelien wrote:

median wrote:

Callaren wrote:

owned

shhh...

Posted: 03/05/04 - 11:21

Fanelien
Joined: 18 Jul 2003
Posts: 2181

Spink wrote:

Fanelien wrote:

median wrote:

Callaren wrote:

owned

shhh...

blargh, compusmack okayed it ^_^ it doesn't break frames! i measured it!

Posted: 03/05/04 - 11:22

khrath

Spink wrote:

http://www.realpoor.com/viewtopic.php?t=219 wrote:

avatars can not be any larger than 130x187

wrong thread, right sentiment, but until/unless ish feels like recoding the limit hack, as long as it doesn't stretch the tables, it's fine.

I think compusmack said something like 150 was the limit on width for the tables, not sure

Posted: 03/05/04 - 11:31

compusmack
Joined: 15 Oct 2002
Posts: 6552

Khrath wrote:

Spink wrote:

http://www.realpoor.com/viewtopic.php?t=219 wrote:

avatars can not be any larger than 130x187

wrong thread, right sentiment, but until/unless ish feels like recoding the limit hack, as long as it doesn't stretch the tables, it's fine.

I think compusmack said something like 150 was the limit on width for the tables, not sure

It's officially 150 now, i've since updated the original (ish's) requirements.

The reason it's 150 is that size is the largest possible without changing the table dimensions.

Counter-0wn3d!

Posted: 03/05/04 - 12:15

Fanelien
Joined: 18 Jul 2003
Posts: 2181

compusmack wrote:

Khrath wrote:

Spink wrote:

http://www.realpoor.com/viewtopic.php?t=219 wrote:

avatars can not be any larger than 130x187

wrong thread, right sentiment, but until/unless ish feels like recoding the limit hack, as long as it doesn't stretch the tables, it's fine.

I think compusmack said something like 150 was the limit on width for the tables, not sure

It's officially 150 now, i've since updated the original (ish's) requirements.

The reason it's 150 is that size is the largest possible without changing the table dimensions.

Counter-0wn3d!

I MADE THIS TO BE!!! I WIN AT LIFE!!!!

Posted: 03/05/04 - 12:16

Kely
Joined: 23 Oct 2002
Posts: 248

LOL. Good one!