The time now is 09/09/08 - 06:38
Log in: Username: Password:
Search forums for:
  

Just saw "Fellowship of the Rings" for the first t

Post new topic   Reply to topic
Author Message
Occulis
RealPoor Jedi
RealPoor Jedi


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 13293
Location: Moral Relativity Central



PostPosted: 03/22/03 - 21:17    Post subject: Just saw "Fellowship of the Rings" for the first t Reply with quote

Glad I waited till the Holy Crusaders of the Dork Kingdom let the hype die down a little. I've read the hobbit and the trilogy about 3x, and was really looking forward.

As the final scene (sam and frodo walking off into the misty sunset) rolled up, i found myself mutters, "My god... what a piece of manufactured hollywood shit. They couldn't make a Cookie Cutter Blockbuster Template better except, I dunno, by adding.. hm.. I'm surprised I didn't hear any Enya."

Then the Enya music kicked in. I laughed my ass off.

It was "good" in the same way high school-run haunted house productions around Halloween time are "scary".
Back to top
Sabathius
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 2179
Location: San Angelo



PostPosted: 03/22/03 - 21:31    Post subject: Reply with quote

One time I saw boobies.
Back to top
Occulis
RealPoor Jedi
RealPoor Jedi


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 13293
Location: Moral Relativity Central



PostPosted: 03/22/03 - 21:40    Post subject: Reply with quote

i will someday
Embarassed
Back to top
TmCleric
Luke Warm
Luke Warm


Joined: 28 Dec 2002
Posts: 152



PostPosted: 03/22/03 - 23:03    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think people who don't think in the same way i think should be killed by aliens
Back to top
Buntz
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 13 Oct 2002
Posts: 3340
Location: Banner Elk, N.C.



PostPosted: 03/22/03 - 23:12    Post subject: Reply with quote

those two halfings are so gay =/
Back to top
Alarach
Banned
Banned


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 597



PostPosted: 03/22/03 - 23:29    Post subject: Reply with quote

Glad I'm not the only one who thought that.
Back to top
Kurel
RealPoor Sensei
RealPoor Sensei


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 1877
Location: Cali



PostPosted: 03/23/03 - 00:00    Post subject: Reply with quote

I didn't like it that much either. It was good, but now what the hype lead it to be.
Back to top
Pags
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 3260



PostPosted: 03/23/03 - 00:48    Post subject: Reply with quote

Buntz wrote:
those two halfings are so gay =/


Especially in Two Towers! They were getting very h**o-like toward the end
Back to top
Finigan
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 3817



PostPosted: 03/23/03 - 01:16    Post subject: Reply with quote

Go watch some sappy french foreign film then you f**s. Most of you people complain about everything popular anyways.
Back to top
Brash
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 20 Oct 2002
Posts: 3958



PostPosted: 03/23/03 - 03:03    Post subject: Reply with quote

you all hate everything lol.
Back to top
ATM Banana
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 02 Jan 2003
Posts: 8575



PostPosted: 03/23/03 - 03:14    Post subject: Reply with quote

actually, we all like to make fun of everything, theres a difference.

RP to many, is known as a place where nobody cares what you say, and if they do, you shouldn't care what they say back... RP prides itself as being the greatest/most random forum ever. at least it is compared to most other forums.
Back to top
compusmack
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 15 Oct 2002
Posts: 6354



PostPosted: 03/23/03 - 23:06    Post subject: Re: Just saw "Fellowship of the Rings" for the fir Reply with quote

Dunn wrote:
Glad I waited till the Holy Crusaders of the Dork Kingdom let the hype die down a little. I've read the hobbit and the trilogy about 3x, and was really looking forward.

As the final scene (sam and frodo walking off into the misty sunset) rolled up, i found myself mutters, "My god... what a piece of manufactured hollywood shit. They couldn't make a Cookie Cutter Blockbuster Template better except, I dunno, by adding.. hm.. I'm surprised I didn't hear any Enya."

Then the Enya music kicked in. I laughed my ass off.

It was "good" in the same way high school-run haunted house productions around Halloween time are "scary".


To be honest i hated the first LotR movie when i saw it in the theatre the first time. I had a bad seat and i saw it the first day, when it was really crowded. Even so, I felt that it didnt have the feeling of movies like willow back when i saw them as a kid. Something about the movie annoyed me, i just couldnt figure out why. The second time i saw it was at home, on dvd (the extended version). It was much better the second time, i had a chance to understand things a bit better plus there were less distractions. It's a good movie, but I never read the book so I dont know how well it stacks up.
Back to top
Nahualli
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8461



PostPosted: 03/24/03 - 09:47    Post subject: Reply with quote

The problem with the Lord of the Rings is that if you are at least a LITTLE familiar with the book, you probably have your own mental image of what shit needs to look like. This leads to one disappointment after another. It's just too easy to pick out all the things that were "wrong" with the movie. In my case this killed my enjoyment of the movie.

I still want to retch watching Arwen dodge Nazgul on horseback..

Or listening to Saruman pledge his loyalty to Barad-Dur..

It's enough to make me not want to watch it sometimes.

-Nah-
Back to top
Brash
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 20 Oct 2002
Posts: 3958



PostPosted: 03/24/03 - 10:43    Post subject: Reply with quote

jesus...... As far is movies baised on books to this is about as good as it gets. They stayed true to the story like 95% of the time. Personaly i think i liked the movie more because i had read the books a few times and enjoyed them so much. Might not have been as good if i never read the books before and didn't enjoy the story so much. Was fun to see it on film.

I guess i didn't go into the theater expecting to see an exact replica of the books , maybe thats why i wasn't disapointed. Very hard to make a movie from a book and stay true to every detail. Even more so with three long books like these. They did a badass job of it though. A ton of dialogue is strait from the book , Golem was just like i had pictured him in my mind . the the battle in the dorf caves again was very much like i had pictured it in my head ...... How perfect can it be ?

If i had to pic one thing about this movie i loved best it was golem though. What they did with golem was astounding. He looked so real. not like starwars jar-jar kinda shit . Golem looked like a real creature. anamation was some of the best i have ever seen with him.
Back to top
Akronn
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8752



PostPosted: 03/24/03 - 11:01    Post subject: Reply with quote

People tend to look at the books (LoTR, Hobbet) through rose colored glasses. Tolkien had a good story in his head, but couldn't tell it well to save his life. It's no great mystery why he never wrote anything else of note. His style (if you could call it that) was too bland and humorless, and he wrote his fair share of fluff to pad the story too. For instance, who here didn't roll their eyes and start skimming past his whole 'our birthdays equal a gross blah blah' crap at Bilbo's birthday? Thank GOD they didn't script that dialogue.

The movies are no better or worse than the books. Both have their faults.
Back to top
Celestra
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 6929



PostPosted: 03/24/03 - 11:08    Post subject: Re: Just saw "Fellowship of the Rings" for the fir Reply with quote

compusmack wrote:


Even so, I felt that it didnt have the feeling of movies like willow back when i saw them as a kid. Something about the movie annoyed me, i just couldnt figure out why..


Maybe thats because, as you pointed out, when you saw Willow, you were a kid. Kids are more accepting and have much more of a sense of wonder and excitement I think when watching a movie. They don't really concern themselves with what it *ought* to be according to their views, they just enjoy a movie for what it is.
Back to top
Nahualli
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8461



PostPosted: 03/24/03 - 11:08    Post subject: Reply with quote

double post Sad

Last edited by Nahualli on 03/24/03 - 11:11; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Nahualli
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8461



PostPosted: 03/24/03 - 11:10    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm sorry Brash.. but, far from nitpicking, aligning Mordor and Isengard is more than a MINOR DETAIL. It's a whole SUBPLOT you are ruining by doing that.

It's as bad as having the Elvish army walk into Helm's Deep in part II.. my jaw dropped when I saw that.. THERE WAS NO SECOND ALLIANCE OF ELVES AND MEN... it happened for a reason!!

Also.. I don't know if they are going to leave out the final chapter, "The Scouring of the Shire" but the gift Galadriel gives to Sam (the mallorn seed surrounded by blessed soil) was a fairly significant detail to leave out. Again, as I have not seen The Return of the King I will wait to see how it turns out. If they leave it out, then it makes sense.. if not... it's an unfortunate detail to leave out because the significance of it is obvious at the end of RoTK.

My point : Galadriel giving Merry and Pippin daggers instead of belts = minor detail. Making Saruman serve Sauron = huge, glaring storyline flaw. Basically making Saruman "an army in service of" Mordor makes no sense in the movie.. if he didn't have his own agenda..... why did Merry and Pippin get dragged off to Isengard instinctively?

The part about Arwen just bothered me because I hate Liv Tyler and because putting her in that role took out Glorfindel whom I personally liked.

-Nah-


Last edited by Nahualli on 03/24/03 - 12:31; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Occulis
RealPoor Jedi
RealPoor Jedi


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 13293
Location: Moral Relativity Central



PostPosted: 03/24/03 - 12:15    Post subject: Reply with quote

i didn't hate parts of the movie because they betrayed my personal image of what the book was about. i hated it because they did the typical hollywood b******t (teary-eyed music and s****y british accents).

GO READ MY OTHER REVIEW IT IS AMAZING IN ITS DEPTH AND COMMENTARY-ISM-ITION.

http://www.realpoor.com/viewtopic.php?t=7357
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Page 1 of 1

Related topics: