|
|
| Author |
Message |
Goraz
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 3736
Location: Philadelphia
|
 Posted: 11/01/05 - 22:25 Post subject: Intel - Northwood Core
|
|
|
wtf doesn't northwood make intel 64 bit CPUs?
I could only find prescott on newegg and they run hot as shit.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Owyyn
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 2900
|
|
Posted: 11/01/05 - 22:54 Post subject:
|
|
|
Get an Athlon 64 X2. 
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Docter
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 21 Oct 2002
Posts: 3420
|
|
Posted: 11/01/05 - 22:56 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Owyyn wrote: | | Get an Athlon 64 X2. |
Yup, I like mine.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
kireol
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 02 Aug 2003
Posts: 9517
Location: Royal Oak, MI
|
|
Posted: 11/01/05 - 22:56 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Owyyn wrote: | | Get an Athlon 64 X2. |
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
khrath
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8750
|
|
Posted: 11/01/05 - 23:03 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
How many of you are running 32bit OS's on a 64bit cpu? =p
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Owyyn
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 2900
|
|
Posted: 11/01/05 - 23:10 Post subject:
|
|
|
| khrath wrote: | | How many of you are running 32bit OS's on a 64bit cpu? =p |
I don't have a 64 bit cpu, but I helped my friend build a A64 4000+ system quite a few months and he has been running x64 ever since.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Ishmael
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 03 Jun 2005
Posts: 4446
Location: The US of A
|
|
Posted: 11/02/05 - 00:11 Post subject:
|
|
|
| khrath wrote: | | How many of you are running 32bit OS's on a 64bit cpu? =p |
I am. 
Hook me up with somethin else sir I've been wanting it for like 2 weeks now!
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Goraz
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 3736
Location: Philadelphia
|
|
Posted: 11/03/05 - 00:25 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
still doesn't answer my question you f*****g retards.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Xenden
RealPoor Sensei
Joined: 08 Jan 2003
Posts: 1532
|
|
Posted: 11/03/05 - 02:41 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Goraz wrote: | | still doesn't answer my question you f*****g retards. |
Big floppy donkey d**k, m**********r.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Mogling
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 29 Dec 2002
Posts: 2451
|
|
Posted: 11/03/05 - 02:48 Post subject:
|
|
|
| khrath wrote: | | How many of you are running 32bit OS's on a 64bit cpu? =p |
Does turing on my N64 count?
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
slack82
Luke Warm
Joined: 16 Oct 2004
Posts: 382
Location: St. Louis, Mo
|
|
Posted: 11/03/05 - 02:56 Post subject:
|
|
|
I don't think Intel has produced any Northwood cores for the past year or so possibly longer, I doubt they ever will again either. The last one was like a 3.4ghz crap on the old s478.
http://indigo.intel.com/compare_cpu/default.aspx?familyID=1 <- link to Intel Product information
To answer you question tho - No Intel does not make 64bit CPUs using the Northwood core.
The earliest 64bit processor they make is a Pentium 4 506, which is a 2.66ghz cpu using prescott core on s775.
Sorry.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Gethy
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 5599
Location: Tallahassee, FL
|
|
Posted: 11/03/05 - 06:12 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Goraz wrote: | | still doesn't answer my question you f*****g retards. |
f**k AMNG DSHITFUCKERS YUOU FUCKEDS ME OFVER FOR THELANST TIME FUCKIGN NGRY GTAKIE IT OTU ON YOU
HAHAHYER FUKN DEAD SUKCERS
INC ANGRYE
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Goraz
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 3736
Location: Philadelphia
|
|
Posted: 11/03/05 - 10:55 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Gethy wrote: | | Goraz wrote: | | still doesn't answer my question you f*****g retards. |
f**k AMNG DSHITFUCKERS YUOU FUCKEDS ME OFVER FOR THELANST TIME FUCKIGN NGRY GTAKIE IT OTU ON YOU
HAHAHYER FUKN DEAD SUKCERS
INC ANGRYE |
lfoflelezZ!!
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Zwadrich
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 12 Oct 2002
Posts: 5015
Location: The Netherlands
|
|
Posted: 11/03/05 - 11:03 Post subject:
|
|
|
| kireol wrote: | | Owyyn wrote: | | Get an Athlon 64 X2. |
|
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Jukas
Toomuchtimeonhands
Joined: 19 Mar 2003
Posts: 896
|
|
Posted: 11/03/05 - 12:25 Post subject:
|
|
|
| khrath wrote: | | How many of you are running 32bit OS's on a 64bit cpu? =p |
I was under the impression that XP 64 uses 32bit emulation for non 64 bit apps resulting in almost double the resources to run it.
Am I mistaken or has that changed?
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
myndwarrp
Can't Stop Posting
Joined: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 637
|
|
Posted: 11/03/05 - 12:53 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Jukas wrote: | | khrath wrote: | | How many of you are running 32bit OS's on a 64bit cpu? =p |
I was under the impression that XP 64 uses 32bit emulation for non 64 bit apps resulting in almost double the resources to run it.
Am I mistaken or has that changed? |
You are half right. XP64 has a 32bit emulator; however, it uses far less resourses than 32 bit Windoze, and is noticibly faster.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Jukas
Toomuchtimeonhands
Joined: 19 Mar 2003
Posts: 896
|
|
Posted: 11/03/05 - 12:59 Post subject:
|
|
|
| myndwarrp wrote: | | Jukas wrote: | | khrath wrote: | | How many of you are running 32bit OS's on a 64bit cpu? =p |
I was under the impression that XP 64 uses 32bit emulation for non 64 bit apps resulting in almost double the resources to run it.
Am I mistaken or has that changed? |
You are half right. XP64 has a 32bit emulator; however, it uses far less resourses than 32 bit Windoze, and is noticibly faster. |
Have any reference material to back that up? I knew it had a 32bit emulator but I was under the impression it used more resources not less than the standard 32bit Windoze.
If it actually uses less I may try XP 64 again.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Goraz
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 3736
Location: Philadelphia
|
|
Posted: 11/03/05 - 18:05 Post subject:
|
|
|
| myndwarrp wrote: | | Jukas wrote: | | khrath wrote: | | How many of you are running 32bit OS's on a 64bit cpu? =p |
I was under the impression that XP 64 uses 32bit emulation for non 64 bit apps resulting in almost double the resources to run it.
Am I mistaken or has that changed? |
You are half right. XP64 has a 32bit emulator; however, it uses far less resourses than 32 bit Windoze, and is noticibly faster. |
So you're saying if I have XP64 and am running 32 bit applications, the emulator will perform better vs. windows xp 32-bit? you kidding me?
Time to research that for confirmation. Shit i'll buy xp64 after I type this if thats the case.
My only quirk is that nvidias xp64 drivers are rather s****y.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
