|
|
| Author |
Message |
compusmack
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 15 Oct 2002
Posts: 6354
|
 Posted: 06/25/04 - 17:27 Post subject: Intel Recalling Flawed New Chips lol
|
|
|
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040625/ap_on_hi_te/intel_recall
| Quote: | By MATTHEW FORDAHL, AP Technology Writer
SAN JOSE, Calif. - Less than a week after the launch, Intel Corp. said Friday it's recalling some of its latest chip sets after the discovery of a manufacturing flaw that could cause computers to crash or fail to boot.
Most of the problem chips were still in the hands of computer and motherboard manufacturers, said Bill Calder, an Intel spokesman.
"The good news is we think almost none of the impacted product — or very little — has reached the end customer because we caught it early and have been working with our customers to replace all the lots with non-affected product," he said.
On Monday, Intel launched the chip sets, formerly code-named Grantsdale and Alderwood, touting them as "among the most significant PC platform changes in a decade," according to a news release issued at the time.
The 915 G/P and 925X chip sets, as they're officially called, coordinate communication between the computer's microprocessor and the rest of the system. The latest models integrate high-quality audio, video and a faster data highway.
Calder said the problem arose because a thin film applied to one of the chips during manufacturing was not removed. It was discovered by one of Intel's customers, though he did not know whether it was a PC or motherboard maker.
"We're working with them to replace the defective products," he said, adding that only some lots are affected by the flaw and Intel has a tracking system to identify where the problem chips were shipped.
Citing the "quiet period" before Intel's earnings, Calder also declined to specify how many units must be returned or the financial impact of the problem. Intel intends to publish its earnings release on July 13.
Shares of Intel, the world's largest semiconductor company, fell 17 cents to close at $27.78 Friday on the Nasdaq Stock Market. |
Funny, I thought everyone said Intel's stuff was less likely to have issues.
thread with previous discussion
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Tolanin
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 3551
|
|
Posted: 06/25/04 - 17:38 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
pwned
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Goraz
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 3736
Location: Philadelphia
|
|
Posted: 06/25/04 - 17:41 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
Yes but unlike AMD, they actually caught it before it reached customer-end.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Tolanin
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 3551
|
|
Posted: 06/25/04 - 17:45 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Goraz wrote: | | Yes but unlike AMD, they actually caught it before it reached customer-end. |
excusses excusses... you just cant bring yourself to admit intel would ship a faulty chip too.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
kemble
RealPoor Sensei
Joined: 14 Oct 2002
Posts: 1909
Location: MI
|
|
Posted: 06/25/04 - 18:38 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
amd4life
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Goraz
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 3736
Location: Philadelphia
|
|
Posted: 06/25/04 - 19:52 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Tolanin wrote: | | Goraz wrote: | | Yes but unlike AMD, they actually caught it before it reached customer-end. |
excusses excusses... you just cant bring yourself to admit intel would ship a faulty chip too. |
Not at all, quite the contrary. I'm not an intel fan boi, mere speculation and the facts are being presented at the table. Intel f****d up, they cleaned up quickly. Period.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Paden
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 23 Oct 2002
Posts: 9362
Location: North CAROLINA!
|
|
Posted: 06/26/04 - 01:13 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
AMD for teh WIN
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
ATM Banana
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 02 Jan 2003
Posts: 8575
|
|
Posted: 06/26/04 - 04:12 Post subject:
|
|
|
paden for teh assisted suicide
ohh and someone find me a new avatar/sig either will do thanksz (pm)
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Cardnyl
Luke Warm
Joined: 18 Jan 2004
Posts: 397
Location: FL
|
|
Posted: 06/26/04 - 10:16 Post subject: Re: Intel Recalling Flawed New Chips lol
|
|
|
| compusmack wrote: | http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040625/ap_on_hi_te/intel_recall
| Quote: | By MATTHEW FORDAHL, AP Technology Writer
SAN JOSE, Calif. - Less than a week after the launch, Intel Corp. said Friday it's recalling some of its latest chip sets after the discovery of a manufacturing flaw that could cause computers to crash or fail to boot.
Most of the problem chips were still in the hands of computer and motherboard manufacturers, said Bill Calder, an Intel spokesman.
"The good news is we think almost none of the impacted product — or very little — has reached the end customer because we caught it early and have been working with our customers to replace all the lots with non-affected product," he said.
On Monday, Intel launched the chip sets, formerly code-named Grantsdale and Alderwood, touting them as "among the most significant PC platform changes in a decade," according to a news release issued at the time.
The 915 G/P and 925X chip sets, as they're officially called, coordinate communication between the computer's microprocessor and the rest of the system. The latest models integrate high-quality audio, video and a faster data highway.
Calder said the problem arose because a thin film applied to one of the chips during manufacturing was not removed. It was discovered by one of Intel's customers, though he did not know whether it was a PC or motherboard maker.
"We're working with them to replace the defective products," he said, adding that only some lots are affected by the flaw and Intel has a tracking system to identify where the problem chips were shipped.
Citing the "quiet period" before Intel's earnings, Calder also declined to specify how many units must be returned or the financial impact of the problem. Intel intends to publish its earnings release on July 13.
Shares of Intel, the world's largest semiconductor company, fell 17 cents to close at $27.78 Friday on the Nasdaq Stock Market. |
Funny, I thought everyone said Intel's stuff was less likely to have issues.
thread with previous discussion |
indeed 
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Renork
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 23 Jun 2003
Posts: 6282
|
|
Posted: 06/26/04 - 10:53 Post subject: Re: Intel Recalling Flawed New Chips lol
|
|
|
| Cardnyl wrote: |
indeed |
why the sudden farmage?
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Bait Masterson
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 3842
|
|
Posted: 06/26/04 - 13:16 Post subject: Re: Intel Recalling Flawed New Chips lol
|
|
|
| compusmack wrote: | http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040625/ap_on_hi_te/intel_recall
| Quote: | By MATTHEW FORDAHL, AP Technology Writer
SAN JOSE, Calif. - Less than a week after the launch, Intel Corp. said Friday it's recalling some of its latest chip sets after the discovery of a manufacturing flaw that could cause computers to crash or fail to boot.
Most of the problem chips were still in the hands of computer and motherboard manufacturers, said Bill Calder, an Intel spokesman.
"The good news is we think almost none of the impacted product — or very little — has reached the end customer because we caught it early and have been working with our customers to replace all the lots with non-affected product," he said.
On Monday, Intel launched the chip sets, formerly code-named Grantsdale and Alderwood, touting them as "among the most significant PC platform changes in a decade," according to a news release issued at the time.
The 915 G/P and 925X chip sets, as they're officially called, coordinate communication between the computer's microprocessor and the rest of the system. The latest models integrate high-quality audio, video and a faster data highway.
Calder said the problem arose because a thin film applied to one of the chips during manufacturing was not removed. It was discovered by one of Intel's customers, though he did not know whether it was a PC or motherboard maker.
"We're working with them to replace the defective products," he said, adding that only some lots are affected by the flaw and Intel has a tracking system to identify where the problem chips were shipped.
Citing the "quiet period" before Intel's earnings, Calder also declined to specify how many units must be returned or the financial impact of the problem. Intel intends to publish its earnings release on July 13.
Shares of Intel, the world's largest semiconductor company, fell 17 cents to close at $27.78 Friday on the Nasdaq Stock Market. |
Funny, I thought everyone said Intel's stuff was less likely to have issues.
thread with previous discussion |
AMD would have sold the chip and told the retailers to sell the customers bigger fans.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Tolanin
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 3551
|
|
Posted: 06/26/04 - 13:32 Post subject: Re: Intel Recalling Flawed New Chips lol
|
|
|
| Bait Masterson wrote: | | compusmack wrote: | http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040625/ap_on_hi_te/intel_recall
| Quote: | By MATTHEW FORDAHL, AP Technology Writer
SAN JOSE, Calif. - Less than a week after the launch, Intel Corp. said Friday it's recalling some of its latest chip sets after the discovery of a manufacturing flaw that could cause computers to crash or fail to boot.
Most of the problem chips were still in the hands of computer and motherboard manufacturers, said Bill Calder, an Intel spokesman.
"The good news is we think almost none of the impacted product — or very little — has reached the end customer because we caught it early and have been working with our customers to replace all the lots with non-affected product," he said.
On Monday, Intel launched the chip sets, formerly code-named Grantsdale and Alderwood, touting them as "among the most significant PC platform changes in a decade," according to a news release issued at the time.
The 915 G/P and 925X chip sets, as they're officially called, coordinate communication between the computer's microprocessor and the rest of the system. The latest models integrate high-quality audio, video and a faster data highway.
Calder said the problem arose because a thin film applied to one of the chips during manufacturing was not removed. It was discovered by one of Intel's customers, though he did not know whether it was a PC or motherboard maker.
"We're working with them to replace the defective products," he said, adding that only some lots are affected by the flaw and Intel has a tracking system to identify where the problem chips were shipped.
Citing the "quiet period" before Intel's earnings, Calder also declined to specify how many units must be returned or the financial impact of the problem. Intel intends to publish its earnings release on July 13.
Shares of Intel, the world's largest semiconductor company, fell 17 cents to close at $27.78 Friday on the Nasdaq Stock Market. |
Funny, I thought everyone said Intel's stuff was less likely to have issues.
thread with previous discussion |
AMD would have sold the chip and told the retailers to sell the customers bigger fans. |
lol just cant get over the fact that amd > intel can you? Fact is intel made the crappy chip not amd, so saying what amd would have done is retarded because we dont know what they would have done because they didnt make the s****y chip.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
ATM Banana
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 02 Jan 2003
Posts: 8575
|
|
Posted: 06/26/04 - 15:19 Post subject:
|
|
|
looks like we have a winner.
please expload your fame... NOW
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Goraz
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 3736
Location: Philadelphia
|
|
Posted: 06/26/04 - 16:37 Post subject: Re: Intel Recalling Flawed New Chips lol
|
|
|
| Tolanin wrote: | | Bait Masterson wrote: | | compusmack wrote: | http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040625/ap_on_hi_te/intel_recall
| Quote: | By MATTHEW FORDAHL, AP Technology Writer
SAN JOSE, Calif. - Less than a week after the launch, Intel Corp. said Friday it's recalling some of its latest chip sets after the discovery of a manufacturing flaw that could cause computers to crash or fail to boot.
Most of the problem chips were still in the hands of computer and motherboard manufacturers, said Bill Calder, an Intel spokesman.
"The good news is we think almost none of the impacted product — or very little — has reached the end customer because we caught it early and have been working with our customers to replace all the lots with non-affected product," he said.
On Monday, Intel launched the chip sets, formerly code-named Grantsdale and Alderwood, touting them as "among the most significant PC platform changes in a decade," according to a news release issued at the time.
The 915 G/P and 925X chip sets, as they're officially called, coordinate communication between the computer's microprocessor and the rest of the system. The latest models integrate high-quality audio, video and a faster data highway.
Calder said the problem arose because a thin film applied to one of the chips during manufacturing was not removed. It was discovered by one of Intel's customers, though he did not know whether it was a PC or motherboard maker.
"We're working with them to replace the defective products," he said, adding that only some lots are affected by the flaw and Intel has a tracking system to identify where the problem chips were shipped.
Citing the "quiet period" before Intel's earnings, Calder also declined to specify how many units must be returned or the financial impact of the problem. Intel intends to publish its earnings release on July 13.
Shares of Intel, the world's largest semiconductor company, fell 17 cents to close at $27.78 Friday on the Nasdaq Stock Market. |
Funny, I thought everyone said Intel's stuff was less likely to have issues.
thread with previous discussion |
AMD would have sold the chip and told the retailers to sell the customers bigger fans. |
lol just cant get over the fact that amd > intel can you? Fact is intel made the crappy chip not amd, so saying what amd would have done is retarded because we dont know what they would have done because they didnt make the s****y chip. |
No. Instead they made multiple s****y chips and kept them on market for years.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Tolanin
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 3551
|
|
Posted: 06/26/04 - 16:40 Post subject: Re: Intel Recalling Flawed New Chips lol
|
|
|
| Goraz wrote: | | Tolanin wrote: | | Bait Masterson wrote: | | compusmack wrote: | http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040625/ap_on_hi_te/intel_recall
| Quote: | By MATTHEW FORDAHL, AP Technology Writer
SAN JOSE, Calif. - Less than a week after the launch, Intel Corp. said Friday it's recalling some of its latest chip sets after the discovery of a manufacturing flaw that could cause computers to crash or fail to boot.
Most of the problem chips were still in the hands of computer and motherboard manufacturers, said Bill Calder, an Intel spokesman.
"The good news is we think almost none of the impacted product — or very little — has reached the end customer because we caught it early and have been working with our customers to replace all the lots with non-affected product," he said.
On Monday, Intel launched the chip sets, formerly code-named Grantsdale and Alderwood, touting them as "among the most significant PC platform changes in a decade," according to a news release issued at the time.
The 915 G/P and 925X chip sets, as they're officially called, coordinate communication between the computer's microprocessor and the rest of the system. The latest models integrate high-quality audio, video and a faster data highway.
Calder said the problem arose because a thin film applied to one of the chips during manufacturing was not removed. It was discovered by one of Intel's customers, though he did not know whether it was a PC or motherboard maker.
"We're working with them to replace the defective products," he said, adding that only some lots are affected by the flaw and Intel has a tracking system to identify where the problem chips were shipped.
Citing the "quiet period" before Intel's earnings, Calder also declined to specify how many units must be returned or the financial impact of the problem. Intel intends to publish its earnings release on July 13.
Shares of Intel, the world's largest semiconductor company, fell 17 cents to close at $27.78 Friday on the Nasdaq Stock Market. |
Funny, I thought everyone said Intel's stuff was less likely to have issues.
thread with previous discussion |
AMD would have sold the chip and told the retailers to sell the customers bigger fans. |
lol just cant get over the fact that amd > intel can you? Fact is intel made the crappy chip not amd, so saying what amd would have done is retarded because we dont know what they would have done because they didnt make the s****y chip. |
No. Instead they made multiple s****y chips and kept them on market for years. |
so we are back to what happened years ago and doesnt matter anymore vs what happened very recently, wtg, but ill take the company that used to make a s****y product and didnt recall them but doesnt anymore over the company that does make the s****y product.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Overon
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 14 Oct 2002
Posts: 3602
Location: PLANE OF PIXIES
|
|
Posted: 06/26/04 - 16:41 Post subject:
|
|
|
a conversation you will never hear:
"hold on i gotta go buy a really powerful server computer for my office .."
"oh? what kind"
"the new AMD, damn those are stable and powerful, i use them in all my machines"
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Goraz
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 3736
Location: Philadelphia
|
|
Posted: 06/26/04 - 16:42 Post subject: Re: Intel Recalling Flawed New Chips lol
|
|
|
| Tolanin wrote: | | Goraz wrote: | | Tolanin wrote: | | Bait Masterson wrote: | | compusmack wrote: | http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040625/ap_on_hi_te/intel_recall
| Quote: | By MATTHEW FORDAHL, AP Technology Writer
SAN JOSE, Calif. - Less than a week after the launch, Intel Corp. said Friday it's recalling some of its latest chip sets after the discovery of a manufacturing flaw that could cause computers to crash or fail to boot.
Most of the problem chips were still in the hands of computer and motherboard manufacturers, said Bill Calder, an Intel spokesman.
"The good news is we think almost none of the impacted product — or very little — has reached the end customer because we caught it early and have been working with our customers to replace all the lots with non-affected product," he said.
On Monday, Intel launched the chip sets, formerly code-named Grantsdale and Alderwood, touting them as "among the most significant PC platform changes in a decade," according to a news release issued at the time.
The 915 G/P and 925X chip sets, as they're officially called, coordinate communication between the computer's microprocessor and the rest of the system. The latest models integrate high-quality audio, video and a faster data highway.
Calder said the problem arose because a thin film applied to one of the chips during manufacturing was not removed. It was discovered by one of Intel's customers, though he did not know whether it was a PC or motherboard maker.
"We're working with them to replace the defective products," he said, adding that only some lots are affected by the flaw and Intel has a tracking system to identify where the problem chips were shipped.
Citing the "quiet period" before Intel's earnings, Calder also declined to specify how many units must be returned or the financial impact of the problem. Intel intends to publish its earnings release on July 13.
Shares of Intel, the world's largest semiconductor company, fell 17 cents to close at $27.78 Friday on the Nasdaq Stock Market. |
Funny, I thought everyone said Intel's stuff was less likely to have issues.
thread with previous discussion |
AMD would have sold the chip and told the retailers to sell the customers bigger fans. |
lol just cant get over the fact that amd > intel can you? Fact is intel made the crappy chip not amd, so saying what amd would have done is retarded because we dont know what they would have done because they didnt make the s****y chip. |
No. Instead they made multiple s****y chips and kept them on market for years. |
so we are back to what happened years ago and doesnt matter anymore vs what happened very recently, wtg, but ill take the company that used to make a s****y product and didnt recall them but doesnt anymore over the company that does make the s****y product. |
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Booker
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 12 Oct 2002
Posts: 2562
Location: Corvallis, Oregon
|
|
Posted: 06/26/04 - 17:01 Post subject: Re: Intel Recalling Flawed New Chips lol
|
|
|
| Tolanin wrote: | so we are back to what happened years ago and doesnt matter anymore vs what happened very recently, wtg, but ill take the company that used to make a s****y product and didnt recall them but doesnt anymore over the company that does make the s****y product.
|
hahahahahahahahahahahaha
.
.
.
.
.
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Aviger
RealPoor Sensei
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 1509
|
|
Posted: 06/26/04 - 17:59 Post subject: Re: Intel Recalling Flawed New Chips lol
|
|
|
| Tolanin wrote: |
lol just cant get over the fact that amd > intel can you? Fact is intel made the crappy chip not amd, so saying what amd would have done is retarded because we dont know what they would have done because they didnt make the s****y chip. |
They did not make a s****y chip. The chip is fine. they had a problem during MANUFACTURING, i.e a problem not related to the chip, but to the machine spitting em out by the millions.
The chip is fine, just one batch of em has problems.
AMD is inherently flawed and unstable. Intel is not..
You loose
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Tolanin
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 3551
|
|
Posted: 06/26/04 - 17:59 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Overon wrote: | a conversation you will never hear:
"hold on i gotta go buy a really powerful server computer for my office .."
"oh? what kind"
"the new AMD, damn those are stable and powerful, i use them in all my machines" |
ok well the discussion was on who makes the better pc cpu not who makes the best server.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Nuldaan
Sir Postalot
Joined: 07 Nov 2002
Posts: 1179
|
|
Posted: 06/26/04 - 18:25 Post subject: Re: Intel Recalling Flawed New Chips lol
|
|
|
| Aviger wrote: | | AMD is inherently flawed and unstable. Intel is not. |
Could you explain this in a bit more detail? AMD and Intel use different architectures. AMD runs at a lower frequency but runs hotter. Neither is more inherently stable than the other.
Is your argument that AMD is less stable and flawed because it runs hotter?
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Overon
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 14 Oct 2002
Posts: 3602
Location: PLANE OF PIXIES
|
|
Posted: 06/26/04 - 20:03 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Tolanin wrote: | | Overon wrote: | a conversation you will never hear:
"hold on i gotta go buy a really powerful server computer for my office .."
"oh? what kind"
"the new AMD, damn those are stable and powerful, i use them in all my machines" |
ok well the discussion was on who makes the better pc cpu not who makes the best server. |
theres no damn difference
Face it, Intel is better than AMD on all accounts except price, and one would expect to pay more to get more anyway.
The day AMD surpasses Intel as the more stable, better chip is the day that Intel dies as a company.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Akronn
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8752
|
|
Posted: 06/26/04 - 20:45 Post subject:
|
|
|
Intel seems intent on that goal, Overon lol.
They have fallen very, very far.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Tolanin
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 3551
|
|
Posted: 06/26/04 - 21:27 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Overon wrote: | | Tolanin wrote: | | Overon wrote: | a conversation you will never hear:
"hold on i gotta go buy a really powerful server computer for my office .."
"oh? what kind"
"the new AMD, damn those are stable and powerful, i use them in all my machines" |
ok well the discussion was on who makes the better pc cpu not who makes the best server. |
theres no damn difference
Face it, Intel is better than AMD on all accounts except price, and one would expect to pay more to get more anyway.
The day AMD surpasses Intel as the more stable, better chip is the day that Intel dies as a company. |
if thats true why do amd chips out preform intel in a good portion of the benchmarks?
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Goraz
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 3736
Location: Philadelphia
|
|
Posted: 06/26/04 - 23:50 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Tolanin wrote: | | Overon wrote: | | Tolanin wrote: | | Overon wrote: | a conversation you will never hear:
"hold on i gotta go buy a really powerful server computer for my office .."
"oh? what kind"
"the new AMD, damn those are stable and powerful, i use them in all my machines" |
ok well the discussion was on who makes the better pc cpu not who makes the best server. |
theres no damn difference
Face it, Intel is better than AMD on all accounts except price, and one would expect to pay more to get more anyway.
The day AMD surpasses Intel as the more stable, better chip is the day that Intel dies as a company. |
if thats true why do amd chips out preform intel in a good portion of the benchmarks? |
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Paden
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 23 Oct 2002
Posts: 9362
Location: North CAROLINA!
|
|
Posted: 06/27/04 - 00:48 Post subject:
|
|
|
I have had 3 amd machines in the past few years.
800mhz
256ram
voodoo 5
abit mobo
600mhz
126ram
voodoo 3
aOpen MK33 mobo
They ran EQ for a few years and both have high uptimes they both of them even had uptimes of 1 months without being restarted.
None of them ever crashed.
I still have the 600mhz one and it would still be running if I had not taken parts off of it.
Right now I have
a AMD Athlon XP 1700+
640mb DDR ram
geforce 4 mx 420
s****y mobo
Never has crashed, never had overheating issues
Highest uptime was like 2 weeks.
So You guys who talk shit about AMD being s****y in every way obviously don't have a clue.
My next machine will be AMD and after that and after that and so on and so fourth till I die.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
compusmack
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 15 Oct 2002
Posts: 6354
|
|
Posted: 06/28/04 - 11:22 Post subject: Re: Intel Recalling Flawed New Chips lol
|
|
|
| Aviger wrote: | | Tolanin wrote: |
lol just cant get over the fact that amd > intel can you? Fact is intel made the crappy chip not amd, so saying what amd would have done is retarded because we dont know what they would have done because they didnt make the s****y chip. |
They did not make a s****y chip. The chip is fine. they had a problem during MANUFACTURING, i.e a problem not related to the chip, but to the machine spitting em out by the millions.
The chip is fine, just one batch of em has problems.
AMD is inherently flawed and unstable. Intel is not..
You loose |
You lose for not posting any proof or facts supporting your claims about AMD.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Overon
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 14 Oct 2002
Posts: 3602
Location: PLANE OF PIXIES
|
|
Posted: 06/28/04 - 12:17 Post subject: Re: Intel Recalling Flawed New Chips lol
|
|
|
| compusmack wrote: | | Aviger wrote: | | Tolanin wrote: |
lol just cant get over the fact that amd > intel can you? Fact is intel made the crappy chip not amd, so saying what amd would have done is retarded because we dont know what they would have done because they didnt make the s****y chip. |
They did not make a s****y chip. The chip is fine. they had a problem during MANUFACTURING, i.e a problem not related to the chip, but to the machine spitting em out by the millions.
The chip is fine, just one batch of em has problems.
AMD is inherently flawed and unstable. Intel is not..
You loose |
You lose for not posting any proof or facts supporting your claims about AMD. |
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Paco
RealPoor Jedi
Joined: 13 Oct 2002
Posts: 12939
Location: Jacksonville, FL
|
|
Posted: 06/28/04 - 12:49 Post subject: Re: Intel Recalling Flawed New Chips lol
|
|
|
| Overon wrote: | | compusmack wrote: | | Aviger wrote: | | Tolanin wrote: |
lol just cant get over the fact that amd > intel can you? Fact is intel made the crappy chip not amd, so saying what amd would have done is retarded because we dont know what they would have done because they didnt make the s****y chip. |
They did not make a s****y chip. The chip is fine. they had a problem during MANUFACTURING, i.e a problem not related to the chip, but to the machine spitting em out by the millions.
The chip is fine, just one batch of em has problems.
AMD is inherently flawed and unstable. Intel is not..
You loose |
You lose for not posting any proof or facts supporting your claims about AMD. |
|
I hope you're trying to be funny. And it's not even that funny..since that's a display error most likely. It'd be funny if this was a thread bashing M$'s OS, but it's not.
Bad form sir. 
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Overon
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 14 Oct 2002
Posts: 3602
Location: PLANE OF PIXIES
|
|
Posted: 06/28/04 - 16:37 Post subject:
|
|
|
i couldnt find pictures of blue screens anywhere
i ended up remembering about a blue screen screensaver and found a pic of it
i did however run into an AMD bluescreen error while looking for bluescreens  but it wasnt a picture
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
