|
|
| Author |
Message |
Confused
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 08 Feb 2004
Posts: 6730
|
 Posted: 08/13/04 - 12:26 Post subject: If Kerry is elected, and Chine decided to drop a nuke...
|
|
|
Kerry will do nothing. As Lt. Governor of Massachusetts in 1989, Kerry wrote the following executive order for the state of Massachusetts :
"Whereas the existing and potential strength of nuclear weapons is such that nuclear war can neither be won nor survived, it can only be prevented; and Whereas the only effective defense against the horrors of nuclear weapons lies in their elimination and in the prevention of nuclear war or attacks, [the Commonwealth of Massachusetts] shall seek to ensure the safety of its citizens by pursuit of policies reflecting a serious commitment to prevention of nuclear war."
And goes on to say:
"No funds shall be expended by the Commonwealth for crisis relocation planning for nuclear war."
I'll translate for you leftists, because you tend to be pretty stupid:
In the case of nuclear war, John Kerry will do nothing. He also opposes the missle defense shield. China will be the next big fight after terror. It's scary to think what will happen if Kerry were allowed to eliminate our MAD policy. This could be LA in 10 years.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Obmar
RealPoor Sensei
Joined: 22 Oct 2002
Posts: 1934
|
|
Posted: 08/13/04 - 12:48 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
man, now i have to go back 15 years to dig up something Bush said (that he probably has contradicted), that may have implications in the real-time world; so that I can show Confused (once again) what a f*****g idiot he is.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Obmar
RealPoor Sensei
Joined: 22 Oct 2002
Posts: 1934
|
|
Posted: 08/13/04 - 12:50 Post subject:
|
|
|
"I will have a foreign-handed foreign policy."—Redwood, Calif., Sept. 27, 2000
not quite.. but funny
edit -
"We don't believe in planners and deciders making the decisions on behalf of Americans."—Scranton, Pa., Sept. 6, 2000
that one is pretty good,
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Confused
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 08 Feb 2004
Posts: 6730
|
|
Posted: 08/13/04 - 13:01 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Obmar wrote: | | man, now i have to go back 15 years to dig up something Bush said (that he probably has contradicted), that may have implications in the real-time world; so that I can show Confused (once again) what a f*****g idiot he is. |
This wasn't something he just "said". It was an executive order issued by him when he was Lt. Governor. I don't know what's scarier...Kerry's willingness to allow the US to be nuked, or your ignorant response. You're a leftist, though, so I guess I'm not surprised. The very survival of our country depends on people like you being defeated. You could wind up being worse for this country that Bin Laden if your kind gets power.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Fabulez
Luke Warm
Joined: 11 Nov 2002
Posts: 437
Location: up in here
|
|
Posted: 08/13/04 - 13:03 Post subject: Re: If Kerry is elected, and Chine decided to drop a nuke...
|
|
|
| Confused wrote: |
I'll translate for you leftists, because you tend to be pretty stupid:
In the case of nuclear war, John Kerry will do nothing. He also opposes the missle defense shield. China will be the next big fight after terror. It's scary to think what will happen if Kerry were allowed to eliminate our MAD policy. This could be LA in 10 years. |
The point of the "missile defense shield" is to eliminate MAD policy. By having a defense shield, you prevent your own destruction. Therefore destruction is no longer mutually assured.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Frehya
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 2398
|
|
Posted: 08/13/04 - 13:09 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
the chinese are more apt to nuke us in the wallet these days.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Confused
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 08 Feb 2004
Posts: 6730
|
|
Posted: 08/13/04 - 13:10 Post subject: Re: If Kerry is elected, and Chine decided to drop a nuke...
|
|
|
| Fabulez wrote: | | Confused wrote: |
I'll translate for you leftists, because you tend to be pretty stupid:
In the case of nuclear war, John Kerry will do nothing. He also opposes the missle defense shield. China will be the next big fight after terror. It's scary to think what will happen if Kerry were allowed to eliminate our MAD policy. This could be LA in 10 years. |
The point of the "missile defense shield" is to eliminate MAD policy. By having a defense shield, you prevent your own destruction. Therefore destruction is no longer mutually assured. |
But Kerry opposed both the missle defense shield and MAD, which guarantees America's destruction if China wanted to use nuclear weapons...which they have a strong inclination for.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Paco
RealPoor Jedi
Joined: 13 Oct 2002
Posts: 12939
Location: Jacksonville, FL
|
|
Posted: 08/13/04 - 13:10 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Frehya
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 2398
|
|
Posted: 08/13/04 - 13:11 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
bah! YOU guys are the p*****s. scared of a little nuclear bomb. tsk tsk
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Paco
RealPoor Jedi
Joined: 13 Oct 2002
Posts: 12939
Location: Jacksonville, FL
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Fabulez
Luke Warm
Joined: 11 Nov 2002
Posts: 437
Location: up in here
|
|
Posted: 08/13/04 - 13:39 Post subject: Re: If Kerry is elected, and Chine decided to drop a nuke...
|
|
|
| Confused wrote: | | Fabulez wrote: | | Confused wrote: |
I'll translate for you leftists, because you tend to be pretty stupid:
In the case of nuclear war, John Kerry will do nothing. He also opposes the missle defense shield. China will be the next big fight after terror. It's scary to think what will happen if Kerry were allowed to eliminate our MAD policy. This could be LA in 10 years. |
The point of the "missile defense shield" is to eliminate MAD policy. By having a defense shield, you prevent your own destruction. Therefore destruction is no longer mutually assured. |
But Kerry opposed both the missle defense shield and MAD, which guarantees America's destruction if China wanted to use nuclear weapons...which they have a strong inclination for. |
The statement you quoted opposes nuclear war. Can you cite a source for your statement that Kerry wants to eliminate our MAD policy?
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Reebo
Sir Postalot
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 1260
Location: Downtown Miami
|
|
Posted: 08/13/04 - 13:44 Post subject:
|
|
|
Who needs Cali anyway it is still a blue state. 
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Confused
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 08 Feb 2004
Posts: 6730
|
|
Posted: 08/13/04 - 13:48 Post subject: Re: If Kerry is elected, and Chine decided to drop a nuke...
|
|
|
| Fabulez wrote: | | Confused wrote: | | Fabulez wrote: | | Confused wrote: |
I'll translate for you leftists, because you tend to be pretty stupid:
In the case of nuclear war, John Kerry will do nothing. He also opposes the missle defense shield. China will be the next big fight after terror. It's scary to think what will happen if Kerry were allowed to eliminate our MAD policy. This could be LA in 10 years. |
The point of the "missile defense shield" is to eliminate MAD policy. By having a defense shield, you prevent your own destruction. Therefore destruction is no longer mutually assured. |
But Kerry opposed both the missle defense shield and MAD, which guarantees America's destruction if China wanted to use nuclear weapons...which they have a strong inclination for. |
The statement you quoted opposes nuclear war. Can you cite a source for your statement that Kerry wants to eliminate our MAD policy? |
Wrong. The executive order opposes a RESPONSE to nuclear war. Big difference. Every sane person opposes nuclear war. Every sane person would also want to respond to a nuclear attack. Kerry does not.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Fabulez
Luke Warm
Joined: 11 Nov 2002
Posts: 437
Location: up in here
|
|
Posted: 08/13/04 - 14:02 Post subject: Re: If Kerry is elected, and Chine decided to drop a nuke...
|
|
|
| Confused wrote: | | Fabulez wrote: |
The statement you quoted opposes nuclear war. Can you cite a source for your statement that Kerry wants to eliminate our MAD policy? |
Wrong. The executive order opposes a RESPONSE to nuclear war. Big difference. Every sane person opposes nuclear war. Every sane person would also want to respond to a nuclear attack. Kerry does not. |
| John Kerry wrote: | | [the Commonwealth of Massachusetts] shall seek to ensure the safety of its citizens by pursuit of policies reflecting a serious commitment to prevention of nuclear war. |
"We want to prevent nuclear war" does not mean "We oppose a response to a nuclear war." It could very well be interpreted as a statement against missile defense though, since by removing the stabilizing effect of MAD missile defense makes nuclear war more likely.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posted: 08/13/04 - 14:49 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Frehya wrote: | | bah! YOU guys are the p*****s. scared of a little nuclear bomb. tsk tsk |
I smell a female.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
lauren000
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 21 Oct 2002
Posts: 3510
Location: colorado springs
|
|
Posted: 08/13/04 - 16:04 Post subject:
|
|
|
It's called MADD.
Mutually Assured Destructive Defense
Anyone with the capacity of logical thinking would realize how f*****g stupid the idea sounds.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Paco
RealPoor Jedi
Joined: 13 Oct 2002
Posts: 12939
Location: Jacksonville, FL
|
|
Posted: 08/13/04 - 22:28 Post subject:
|
|
|
| lauren000 wrote: | It's called MADD.
Mutually Assured Destructive Defense
Anyone with the capacity of logical thinking would realize how f*****g stupid the idea sounds. |
Just shut up. Idiot.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posted: 08/13/04 - 22:49 Post subject:
|
|
|
Fictional scenario meant to incur compliance by causing fear.
Weak tactics
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Vengar_OO
Sir Postalot
Joined: 30 Nov 2002
Posts: 1029
Location: Mayport, FL
|
|
Posted: 08/14/04 - 20:33 Post subject: -==-
|
|
|
|
not surprising in the least
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posted: 08/14/04 - 22:42 Post subject: Re: If Kerry is elected, and Chine decided to drop a nuke...
|
|
|
| Fabulez wrote: | | Confused wrote: |
I'll translate for you leftists, because you tend to be pretty stupid:
In the case of nuclear war, John Kerry will do nothing. He also opposes the missle defense shield. China will be the next big fight after terror. It's scary to think what will happen if Kerry were allowed to eliminate our MAD policy. This could be LA in 10 years. |
The point of the "missile defense shield" is to eliminate MAD policy. By having a defense shield, you prevent your own destruction. Therefore destruction is no longer mutually assured. |
Wow, that is some majorly convoluted female logic there, if I ever saw some.
So the MDS whole purpose is to eliminate the MAD policy?
LOL
Comical.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
ATM Banana
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 02 Jan 2003
Posts: 8575
|
|
Posted: 08/15/04 - 00:06 Post subject:
|
|
|
I thought madd was moms against drunk driving?
i know what this thread needs
concrete information.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
killswitch
Luke Warm
Joined: 09 Jun 2003
Posts: 325
|
|
Posted: 08/15/04 - 01:23 Post subject: Re: If Kerry is elected, and Chine decided to drop a nuke...
|
|
|
| Confused wrote: | This could be LA in 10 years.
|
Correction, that should be LA and not in 10 years, tommorow would be nice.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Paco
RealPoor Jedi
Joined: 13 Oct 2002
Posts: 12939
Location: Jacksonville, FL
|
|
Posted: 08/15/04 - 08:45 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Quote: | | and Chine decided to drop a nuke... |
China
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
scrotum
Toomuchtimeonhands
Joined: 13 Oct 2002
Posts: 828
|
|
Posted: 08/15/04 - 09:39 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
go f*****g hang yourself you f*****g p***y
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Paco
RealPoor Jedi
Joined: 13 Oct 2002
Posts: 12939
Location: Jacksonville, FL
|
|
Posted: 08/15/04 - 09:41 Post subject:
|
|
|
| scrotum wrote: | | go f*****g hang yourself you f*****g p***y |
ladies first, w***e
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Occulis
RealPoor Jedi
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 13293
Location: Moral Relativity Central
|
|
Posted: 08/15/04 - 10:39 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
Wait, wait... let me get this straight. You're attacking Kerry because he said XYZ in the past, and you're certain he'll stick to what he said back then. But, in another thread, you're attacking him because he flip-flops and doesn't stick to what he says?
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posted: 08/15/04 - 13:49 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Occulis wrote: | | Wait, wait... let me get this straight. You're attacking Kerry because he said XYZ in the past, and you're certain he'll stick to what he said back then. But, in another thread, you're attacking him because he flip-flops and doesn't stick to what he says? |
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Vengar_OO
Sir Postalot
Joined: 30 Nov 2002
Posts: 1029
Location: Mayport, FL
|
|
Posted: 08/15/04 - 15:34 Post subject: -==-
|
|
|
|
Have yet to hear him flip-flop about this b***h-ass weak statement.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posted: 08/15/04 - 16:27 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Occulis wrote: | | Wait, wait... let me get this straight. You're attacking Kerry because he said XYZ in the past, and you're certain he'll stick to what he said back then. But, in another thread, you're attacking him because he flip-flops and doesn't stick to what he says? |
I'm certain he will stick to nothing he says, unless he sees a political advantage in changing his position. But then again, he might change that position AGAIN, if he sees a different political advantage to change his previous position. Unless , of course, he changes this position agaaaain, because he thinks he will gain politically to change his position again...
Um...
/reads it over a few times.
Understand?
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posted: 08/15/04 - 17:37 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Paco wrote: | |
REMEMBER SOLDIER!!!
PATRIOTISM REQUIRES BLIND OBEDIANCE!!!
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
