|
|
| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
 Posted: 11/04/04 - 15:13 Post subject: How surprised do you right wingers truly think...
|
|
|
...the Democrats are?
Every SINGLE poll since early september has reflected Kerry trailing Bush in the voters and likely voters.
We KNEW it was going to be an uphill battle and just as all the polls predicted, we lost.
Jump around beat your chest, eat a d**k for all I care but dont go acting like this is some kind of "electorial upset" because its just business as usual in the USA.
Silvermouse was right ...I guess Kerry was just too fugly to be elected.
Last edited by Guest on 11/04/04 - 15:19; edited 2 times in total
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Silvermouse
RealPoor Jedi
Joined: 12 Oct 2002
Posts: 11015
|
|
Posted: 11/04/04 - 15:17 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
If the democrats had a hot candidate, I bet they could win.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Confused
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 08 Feb 2004
Posts: 6730
|
|
Posted: 11/04/04 - 15:20 Post subject: Re: How surprised do you right wingers truly think...
|
|
|
| Jack Crow wrote: | ...the Democrats are?
Every SINGLE poll since early september has reflected Kerry trailing Bush in the voters and likely voters.
We KNEW it was going to be an uphill battle and just as all the polls predicted, we lost.
Jump around beat your chest, eat a d**k for all I care but dont go acting like this is some kind of "electorial upset" because its just business as usual in the USA.
Silvermouse was right ...I guess Kerry was just too fugly to be elected. |
LOL. Pick up a mirror and stop blaming everyone else.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Frax
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8489
Location: Fuck yoiu fucking fuckers
|
|
Posted: 11/04/04 - 15:28 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posted: 11/04/04 - 15:46 Post subject:
|
|
|
Yep business as usual.
Nothing changes, as the polls have indicated for months.
Yay! What was predicted months ago has come to pass...WE'RE GENIUSES!!!
Nice to see California tell Bush "f**k you" on the stem cell research issue, that was refreshing.
Nice to see New York, the state that was attacked by terrorists tell Bush "f**k YOU" as well....they wanted justice and Bush gave them Iraq.
All the states that voted for Bush were mainly the "god and guns" crowd heartland and southern states or simpering old conservative fools who actually believe attacking Iraq is going to help in the war against terror.
So like I said, celebrate beat your chest and confused can keep sucking Kbarrs c**k...you won bragging rights but by all means dont think that all of America backs bush.
The election ended 51 to kerrys 48 percent...
Republicans are the majority but just barely...you can thank a terrorist for that too for striking fear into the citizens.
Bin laden showing up just before election time should have shown America how innefective Bush was but instead I fear it helped Bush.
Democrats need to re tool their stratgeies and stop picking candidates that are un electable.
I personally liked Kerry as a candidate, I saw the world unifying against terror with him at the helm and saw an end to Iraq.
However I am not the usual blank staring fearful p***y sheep voter, and as was little surprise due to zillions of early polls...we lost.
Good to see California and New York, the heart and soul of America cast their votes against Bush though...damn good.
Last edited by Guest on 11/04/04 - 17:25; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Confused
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 08 Feb 2004
Posts: 6730
|
|
Posted: 11/04/04 - 15:54 Post subject:
|
|
|
Really? You predicted Bush would win? For some reason I don't recall you saying that.
| Jack Crow wrote: | In 1992 they rocked the vote!
In 2004 they ZERG the vote
|
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Docter
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 21 Oct 2002
Posts: 3420
|
|
Posted: 11/04/04 - 15:55 Post subject: Re: How surprised do you right wingers truly think...
|
|
|
| Jack Crow wrote: | ...the Democrats are?
Every SINGLE poll since early september has reflected Kerry trailing Bush in the voters and likely voters.
We KNEW it was going to be an uphill battle and just as all the polls predicted, we lost.
Jump around beat your chest, eat a d**k for all I care but dont go acting like this is some kind of "electorial upset" because its just business as usual in the USA.
Silvermouse was right ...I guess Kerry was just too fugly to be elected. |
And how many of those f*****g polls did the demonRats pad???
You can't say shit...MAJORITY of AMERICANS voted for Bush...so the MAJORITY of AMERICANS don't agree with you...get a clue.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Kaladam
Sir Postalot
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 1110
|
|
Posted: 11/04/04 - 15:57 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Silvermouse wrote: | | If the democrats had a hot candidate, I bet they could win. |
Hilary
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Confused
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 08 Feb 2004
Posts: 6730
|
|
Posted: 11/04/04 - 15:58 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Kaladam wrote: | | Silvermouse wrote: | | If the democrats had a hot candidate, I bet they could win. |
Hilary |
 She would have lost by twice the margin of Kerry.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posted: 11/04/04 - 16:01 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Confused wrote: | Really? You predicted Bush would win? For some reason I don't recall you saying that.
| Jack Crow wrote: | In 1992 they rocked the vote!
In 2004 they ZERG the vote
|
|
And when did I post that prediction?
LONG before september.
I said weve known since early september we were behind and since early september I never said anything more definiative than "looks like Kerry is catching up" whenever a poll said he was getting to within 6 percent or so.
Still an uphill fight and still it showed kerry behind.
So sorry, when Kerry lost, most intelligent democrats werent all that surprised.
yes we were hopeful for an upset but harldy surprised
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posted: 11/04/04 - 16:05 Post subject: Re: How surprised do you right wingers truly think...
|
|
|
| Docter wrote: | | Jack Crow wrote: | ...the Democrats are?
Every SINGLE poll since early september has reflected Kerry trailing Bush in the voters and likely voters.
We KNEW it was going to be an uphill battle and just as all the polls predicted, we lost.
Jump around beat your chest, eat a d**k for all I care but dont go acting like this is some kind of "electorial upset" because its just business as usual in the USA.
Silvermouse was right ...I guess Kerry was just too fugly to be elected. |
And how many of those f*****g polls did the demonRats pad???
You can't say shit...MAJORITY of AMERICANS voted for Bush...so the MAJORITY of AMERICANS don't agree with you...get a clue. |
The election ended 48 kerry to Bushes 51 percent.
You aint all that, b***h!
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Merican
Sir Postalot
Joined: 05 Mar 2003
Posts: 1491
|
|
Posted: 11/04/04 - 16:06 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
San Diego County was for Bush. Glad my vote got a county to at least side with bush heh.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
motherface
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 12 Mar 2003
Posts: 3407
|
|
Posted: 11/04/04 - 16:07 Post subject:
|
|
|
If the Democrats had presented a decent candidate this election would have been in the bag. I haven't spoken to anyone who actually liked Kerry, everyone who voted for him was voting "Not Bush." Anybody able to rationally examine the situation would see that with Kerry in office very little would be different, especially with so many Republicans moving into Congress. Until the Democrats find such a candidate their party is going down the s*****r. Maybe Barack Obama '12!
It would be refreshing to see a presidential candidate win the popular vote like 60/40 or something. I can't stand hearing about a "mandate from the people" when you win with a 3% spread. 51% of people liked you, 48% didn't; not much of a mandate.
As for the votes on gay marriage, that's an example of why there should still be voting tests. The states that voted to ban gay marriage would also vote to reinstate slavery. If you had one of those 3D graphs of the ignorance level of the US you'd see huge red mountains across Middle America.
I was pleased to see Daschle ousted though!
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Dyers
Sir Postalot
Joined: 26 Oct 2002
Posts: 1269
|
|
Posted: 11/04/04 - 16:11 Post subject:
|
|
|
| motherface wrote: | If the Democrats had presented a decent candidate this election would have been in the bag. I haven't spoken to anyone who actually liked Kerry, everyone who voted for him was voting "Not Bush." Anybody able to rationally examine the situation would see that with Kerry in office very little would be different, especially with so many Republicans moving into Congress. Until the Democrats find such a candidate their party is going down the s*****r. Maybe Barack Obama '12!
It would be refreshing to see a presidential candidate win the popular vote like 60/40 or something. I can't stand hearing about a "mandate from the people" when you win with a 3% spread. 51% of people liked you, 48% didn't; not much of a mandate.
As for the votes on gay marriage, that's an example of why there should still be voting tests. The states that voted to ban gay marriage would also vote to reinstate slavery. If you had one of those 3D graphs of the ignorance level of the US you'd see huge red mountains across Middle America.
I was pleased to see Daschle ousted though! |
So you equate the acceptance of and approving of f*****g each other in the ass as intelligent whereas opposers to doing such things as non intelligent?
rofl
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
goatface
Sir Postalot
Joined: 12 Oct 2002
Posts: 1354
|
|
Posted: 11/04/04 - 16:14 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Dyers wrote: |
So you equate the acceptance of and approving of f*****g each other in the ass as intelligent whereas opposers to doing such things as non intelligent?
rofl |
lol
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Brael
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 2122
|
|
Posted: 11/04/04 - 16:15 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
I've said that for months :/ Kerry didn't have any people actually for him so he couldn't win, Bush on the other hand had few people on his side just to vote against Kerry.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
motherface
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 12 Mar 2003
Posts: 3407
|
|
Posted: 11/04/04 - 16:24 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Dyers wrote: | | So you equate the acceptance of and approving of f*****g each other in the ass as intelligent whereas opposers to doing such things as non intelligent? |
I didn't say anything about being intelligent or not. If you think people shouldn't be entitled to the same freedoms as you just because of who they love, you're ignorant. It's the same mentality that led the South to fight to preserve slavery.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Dyers
Sir Postalot
Joined: 26 Oct 2002
Posts: 1269
|
|
Posted: 11/04/04 - 16:35 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Quote: | | As for the votes on gay marriage, that's an example of why there should still be voting tests. The states that voted to ban gay marriage would also vote to reinstate slavery. If you had one of those 3D graphs of the ignorance level of the US you'd see huge red mountains across Middle America. |
You clearely stated that the midwest were ignorant people and should be required to pass a test first to see if they qualify to vote because they are against f*****g each other in the ass.
You stated:
f**k each other in the ass = intelligent.
Not f*****g each other in the ass = not intelligent.
Yes to gay marriage = accepting that f*****g each other in the ass is good, and to you, intelligent thinking.
You sir are a d*****t and ignorant. In fact, with you agreeing with such a thing makes you equal to a monkey and lacking the control over your own mind and body. Do you walk around sniffing peoples asses, you animal?
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posted: 11/04/04 - 16:41 Post subject:
|
|
|
Dyers crawled off his Blade Realdoll long enough to type
| Quote: | You stated:
f**k each other in the ass = intelligent.
Not f*****g each other in the ass = not intelligent.
Yes to gay marriage = accepting that f*****g each other in the ass is good, and to you, intelligent thinking. |
I am stating that Dyers=dumb f**k because his logic is one step above the guy who lost 3/4 of his brain to a rare tropical parasite.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Silvermouse
RealPoor Jedi
Joined: 12 Oct 2002
Posts: 11015
|
|
Posted: 11/04/04 - 16:46 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Dyers wrote: | | Quote: | | As for the votes on gay marriage, that's an example of why there should still be voting tests. The states that voted to ban gay marriage would also vote to reinstate slavery. If you had one of those 3D graphs of the ignorance level of the US you'd see huge red mountains across Middle America. |
You clearely stated that the midwest were ignorant people and should be required to pass a test first to see if they qualify to vote because they are against f*****g each other in the ass.
You stated:
f**k each other in the ass = intelligent.
Not f*****g each other in the ass = not intelligent.
Yes to gay marriage = accepting that f*****g each other in the ass is good, and to you, intelligent thinking.
You sir are a d*****t and ignorant. In fact, with you agreeing with such a thing makes you equal to a monkey and lacking the control over your own mind and body. Do you walk around sniffing peoples asses, you animal? |
What the f**k are you talking about? Apparantly, this is a sodomy/hatred issue for you. You hate gays because they disgust you, so just say it!
There are millions of gay people in this country. They aren't leaving. The issue is whether they should be able to marry like heterosexuals, not how they f**k. Don't be ignorant.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Dyers
Sir Postalot
Joined: 26 Oct 2002
Posts: 1269
|
|
Posted: 11/04/04 - 16:46 Post subject:
|
|
|
Explain to me where my logic is lacking, jack?
Persons that voted against gay marriage are pretty much stating that they are against homosexuality.
He stated that the 3D graph would climb high over the midwest showing lack of intelligence for thinking such things.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Dyers
Sir Postalot
Joined: 26 Oct 2002
Posts: 1269
|
|
Posted: 11/04/04 - 16:53 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Silvermouse wrote: | | Dyers wrote: | | Quote: | | As for the votes on gay marriage, that's an example of why there should still be voting tests. The states that voted to ban gay marriage would also vote to reinstate slavery. If you had one of those 3D graphs of the ignorance level of the US you'd see huge red mountains across Middle America. |
You clearely stated that the midwest were ignorant people and should be required to pass a test first to see if they qualify to vote because they are against f*****g each other in the ass.
You stated:
f**k each other in the ass = intelligent.
Not f*****g each other in the ass = not intelligent.
Yes to gay marriage = accepting that f*****g each other in the ass is good, and to you, intelligent thinking.
You sir are a d*****t and ignorant. In fact, with you agreeing with such a thing makes you equal to a monkey and lacking the control over your own mind and body. Do you walk around sniffing peoples asses, you animal? |
What the f**k are you talking about? Apparantly, this is a sodomy/hatred issue for you. You hate gays because they disgust you, so just say it!
There are millions of gay people in this country. They aren't leaving. The issue is whether they should be able to marry like heterosexuals, not how they f**k. Don't be ignorant. |
Yes I am against homosexuality and have strong beliefs against it, yet that has nothing to do with what I am implying. My argument was about his stating that the midwests voting against gay marriage are not intelligent and are lacking any intelligence for voting that way.
I have met abi in game and had the froot lick my character and I kindly asked him to backoff, which he did and we were good. I still have been nice to him and nah when ever we did talk in passing. I don't go out of my way to be a bigot or whatever you wish to call it. I try to be cool with everyone and live and let live.
I still have my views and share them when I will to do so.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Confused
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 08 Feb 2004
Posts: 6730
|
|
Posted: 11/04/04 - 16:57 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Jack Crow wrote: | | Confused wrote: | Really? You predicted Bush would win? For some reason I don't recall you saying that.
| Jack Crow wrote: | In 1992 they rocked the vote!
In 2004 they ZERG the vote
|
|
And when did I post that prediction?
LONG before september.
I said weve known since early september we were behind and since early september I never said anything more definiative than "looks like Kerry is catching up" whenever a poll said he was getting to within 6 percent or so.
Still an uphill fight and still it showed kerry behind.
So sorry, when Kerry lost, most intelligent democrats werent all that surprised.
yes we were hopeful for an upset but harldy surprised |
That's only because you lack conviction. You made your opinion obvious.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posted: 11/04/04 - 17:05 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Confused wrote: | | Jack Crow wrote: | | Confused wrote: | Really? You predicted Bush would win? For some reason I don't recall you saying that.
| Jack Crow wrote: | In 1992 they rocked the vote!
In 2004 they ZERG the vote
|
|
And when did I post that prediction?
LONG before september.
I said weve known since early september we were behind and since early september I never said anything more definiative than "looks like Kerry is catching up" whenever a poll said he was getting to within 6 percent or so.
Still an uphill fight and still it showed kerry behind.
So sorry, when Kerry lost, most intelligent democrats werent all that surprised.
yes we were hopeful for an upset but harldy surprised |
That's only because you lack conviction. You made your opinion obvious. |
Actually my ability to interpret polls is the reason, my conviction has nothing to do with it , tardboy.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
motherface
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 12 Mar 2003
Posts: 3407
|
|
Posted: 11/04/04 - 17:10 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Dyers wrote: |
You clearely stated that the midwest were ignorant people and should be required to pass a test first to see if they qualify to vote because they are against f*****g each other in the ass.
You stated:
f**k each other in the ass = intelligent.
Not f*****g each other in the ass = not intelligent.
Yes to gay marriage = accepting that f*****g each other in the ass is good, and to you, intelligent thinking.
You sir are a d*****t and ignorant. In fact, with you agreeing with such a thing makes you equal to a monkey and lacking the control over your own mind and body. Do you walk around sniffing peoples asses, you animal? |
Unfortunately you're unable to comprehend the distinction between ignorance and stupidity. Removing someone's rights due to something as arbitrary as **** orientation is ignorant. Given your comments I can safely assume you won't need an example of stupidity.  I'm terribly sorry you weren't capable of following a simple line of logic.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Dyers
Sir Postalot
Joined: 26 Oct 2002
Posts: 1269
|
|
Posted: 11/04/04 - 18:08 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Quote: | | Removing someone's rights due to something as arbitrary as **** orientation is ignorant. |
They had rights removed? It is not their right. Marriage is a right between a man and a woman. Where does it state it was a right between the same ****? 
I believe in freedom, to a certain extent.
Acceptance of homosexual marriages will only lead to further moral decay in our society; decline and eventual death.
Your simple line of logic of allowing same **** intercourse, which when accepted bleeds into our society like a disease, is not logical at all as you only see what is before your face, the here and now, and not the repurcussions of such behaviour in the future.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
motherface
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 12 Mar 2003
Posts: 3407
|
|
Posted: 11/04/04 - 18:24 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Dyers wrote: | | Quote: | | Removing someone's rights due to something as arbitrary as **** orientation is ignorant. |
They had rights removed? It is not their right. Marriage is a right between a man and a woman. Where does it state it was a right between the same ****?
I believe in freedom, to a certain extent.
Acceptance of homosexual marriages will only lead to further moral decay in our society; decline and eventual death.
Your simple line of logic of allowing same **** intercourse, which when accepted bleeds into our society like a disease, is not logical at all as you only see what is before your face, the here and now, and not the repurcussions of such behaviour in the future. |
News flash: there have always been gays and there always will be, regardless of whether or not it's "allowed." Sounds like your "solution" is to round 'em up and shoot 'em all. I take it back, you're ignorant as well as stupid. Remember we had this discussion once, about how "A house divided against itself cannot stand," and then how "separate but equal" is unworkable.
One of the most enduring images of ignorance the United States has ever seen. I see history repeating itself.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Dyers
Sir Postalot
Joined: 26 Oct 2002
Posts: 1269
|
|
Posted: 11/04/04 - 19:17 Post subject:
|
|
|
Never said my solution was to round them up and shoot them all.
lol
Back to the main argument. So you like to take it in the ass and think you are intelligent for doing so, eh?
You probably take that as a compliment don't ya lil lady? So which one are you boy? You play the woman or the man?
Sucks to have a conservative with views like mine running the US don't it. Except I don't have to be on the low to get votes. We tolerate you. 
http://www.realpoor.com/viewtopic.php?t=31782
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Zonk
Toomuchtimeonhands
Joined: 02 Jan 2003
Posts: 976
|
|
Posted: 11/04/04 - 19:25 Post subject:
|
|
|
haha u suck Jack you lost we won
you also just got f*****g owned in this thread by confused.
Go look at a county by county map. its all f*****g red.
as far as this crap:
| Quote: | | As for the votes on gay marriage, that's an example of why there should still be voting tests. The states that voted to ban gay marriage would also vote to reinstate slavery. If you had one of those 3D graphs of the ignorance level of the US you'd see huge red mountains across Middle America. |
if there were voteing tests 75 percent of Kerry's supporters in urban areas would not have passed.
I love how you diss southern and heartland people too.
The South is strongly republican and the good news is its the fastest growing part of the country to that means even more electoral votes in 2008  and the new south is full of rednecks but they are getting smarter and frankly they just dont f*****g like Kerry or the Dems after what they said about the war and iraq and the way he was a traitor
Zell Miller summed it up for exactly what most americans feel his speech was f*****g brillant and he is a f*****g Georgia Jimmy Carter southern Dem and he went apeshit on kerry so the south has just been totally lost for the dems they dont have a chance in the South for a while after this s****y election.
Texas- the whole f*****g state is red and they all have Bush blood flowing through them. Dallas had all of its 10 counties haha was f*****g great.
I think the midwest and Southwest feel the same way New Mexico Arizona Nevada =bush and it suprised me that Sand Diego went bush so there is still some hope in California.  Especially if Arnold runs in 08 he will take California for sure.
So that just leaves the Northeast which is still stongly brainwashed by liberals.
face it we are a conservative country that loves Bush.
and there is nothing u can do about it 
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Starks
Toomuchtimeonhands
Joined: 17 Oct 2002
Posts: 865
|
|
Posted: 11/04/04 - 19:28 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
I hate all those crazy liberals like Socrates, Jesus Christ, Voltaire, Martin Luther, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Sir Isaac Newton, Abe Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, Mohandas Ghandi, Winston Churchill, Martin Luther King Jr, JFK, and Ralph Nader. Wish they were put on and island and blown up.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
