|
|
| Author |
Message |
Tolanin
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 3551
|
 Posted: 09/21/04 - 23:30 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
I am honestly afraid of what some of you psycopaths would do, i can kill see myself personally being able to kill someone but atleast its mitigated by some f*****g intelligence and morality... some of you guys are just f*****g insane... really are like nazis.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
merdocc
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 2038
Location: Pasadena Ca
|
|
Posted: 09/21/04 - 23:35 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
Lol actually put them in the situation to do the killing and see what happens.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Tolanin
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 3551
|
|
Posted: 09/21/04 - 23:38 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
they dont need to be, other people would be willing to do the killing, all they need to do is suport it and I think some of them might.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Conqueso
Luke Warm
Joined: 25 Jun 2003
Posts: 388
|
|
Posted: 09/22/04 - 00:18 Post subject:
|
|
|
http://www.debka.com/article.php?aid=908
| Quote: | Syria handed the two women over to the Americans on April 28, 2003, together with Dr. Taha’s husband, Gen. Amir Muhammed Rashed, director of Iraq’s missile development program – as first revealed by DEBKA-Net-Weekly 107 five days later, on May 2, 2003.
According to DEBKAfile’s intelligence sources, Zarqawi has been tipped off that one of the two Iraqi scientists is on the point of breaking under questioning and spilling the beans on Saddam’s WMD to her American interrogators. He therefore interceded by seizing the three Western hostages, either to gain her release or scare her into holding silent. |
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Pankrat
Can't Stop Posting
Joined: 12 Oct 2002
Posts: 603
Location: Land of Paranoia
|
|
Posted: 09/22/04 - 00:29 Post subject:
|
|
|
Thanks for the url conq - haven't checked Debka in a while. OK well, now it does make sense, method to their madness. What coup that would be if one of those b*****s gives up the WMD's eh?
And so much for the "there are no links between Sadam and Al Qaeda".
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Tolanin
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 3551
|
|
Posted: 09/22/04 - 00:33 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
well there might not be, saddams ghost is still a rallying point for the al queda working in the area now, whether they were ever with him when he was in power is irrelevant because he is gone now.. justifing the american invasion like that would hurt their effeorts to recruit... remember its not like the people of iraq know if there were wmds or not either.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Buckshot
Luke Warm
Joined: 14 Sep 2004
Posts: 449
|
|
Posted: 09/22/04 - 01:41 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Brael wrote: | | So... the liberal solution to stopping the attacks is to give the people that want us dead whatever they ask for? Once you start negotiating with terrorists they win since they're getting what they want. |
In November 1986, it was disclosed that the Reagan administration had been bargaining with terrorists by selling arms to Iran. Reagan went on television and vehemently denied that any such sale had occurred. He retracted this statement a week later, insisting that the sale of weapons had not been an arms-for-hostages deal. In March 1987, Reagan was forced to issue a second retraction, admitting that the deal had been arms-for-hostages after all.
Shipping arms to Iran violated an arms embargo against that country, and bargaining with terrorists violated Reagan's campaign promise never to do so.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
khrath
Guest
|
|
Posted: 09/22/04 - 07:35 Post subject:
|
|
|
WRONG!!!
Reagan gave Iran weapons to support their already ongoing war with Iraq, in doing so he got back several American hostages who were being held in Lebanon. He did NOT trade weapons for hostages to terrorist organizations. He payed iran off, who in turn made happen the safe return of our people, who were being held by terrorist groups.
He influenced Iran, got our people back, and the terrosists got not a f*****g thing.
Plus, you completely left out the fact that all of the proceeds were used to aid the contra rebels who were involved in a guerilla war against a corrupt government being puppeted by the soviets and cuba.
The ONLY thing they were guiltyy of doing was ignoring a trade embargo against Iran, and aiding the rebels, contrary to what congress had already made judgement on. He told congress to f**k off, because he loved america, and did what was best for her. That, is something you won't ever see another american president do again, because it takes f*****g balls, and Reagan was not a p***y.
In a nutshell, he gave a leg up to people fighting our cold war enemies, AND WON THE COLD WAR, at the same time he managed to arange the safe return of several american citizens back to their families.
Reagan was a f*****g brilliant man, don't ever lie about his doings again.
Oh, and go read a history book ^^
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Conqueso
Luke Warm
Joined: 25 Jun 2003
Posts: 388
|
|
Posted: 09/22/04 - 09:13 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Quote: | | And so much for the "there are no links between Sadam and Al Qaeda". |
I posted this in another thread. The UN Oil for Food program is showing possible links between Saddam and Al Qaeda. They can not solidly confirm any links until they get the documents from the UN.
| Quote: | | http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,132832,00.html |
(There are many articles about relating to this issue. There are links for each of the articles on the one above.)
An update about Al-Zarqawi. It appears that intelligence has gotten better:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/ap/20040922/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_militant_killed
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Buckshot
Luke Warm
Joined: 14 Sep 2004
Posts: 449
|
|
Posted: 09/22/04 - 11:17 Post subject:
|
|
|
July 18, 1985: Reagan approves National Security Advisor William McFarlane's plan to reach out to Iranian Foreign Minister Ghorbanifar. MacFarlane is interested in an opening with Iran through influence with moderates by helping Iran in war against Iraq. Reagan is more interested in using any influence gained through better relations to free hostages being held in Beirut by extremist Iranian terrorists.
July 25, 1985: Israeli representatives meet with Iranian Foreign Minister Ghorbanifar for first time on arms deal. Israel will sell arms to Iran, U.S. will replace Israeli stocks.
August 20, 1985: 96 anti-tank missiles are sent to Iran by Israel. No hostages are released in return.
August 30, 1985: Israel ships 508 anti-tank missiles to Iran.
November 17, 1985: Colonel Oliver North is put in charge of the shipment of HAWK anti-aircraft missiles to Iran.
December 7, 1985: Shultz, Weinberger, and Donald Regan advise Reagan to stop Iran arms sales.
February 16, 1986: The U.S. ships 1000 anti-tank missiles to Iran.
May 29, 1986: Colonel Oliver North tells McFarlane that profits of weapons sales to Iran are being diverted to the Contras.
July 26, 1986: Father Jenco, one of the hostages held by Muslim extremists, is released in Damascus.
August 27, 1986: Reagan signs an anti-terrorism law that bans arms sales to nations that support terrorism, and strengthens U.S. anti-terrorist measures.
September 1986: Former National Security Advisor WilliamMcFarlane takes 23 tons of weapons to Iran.
October 30: 500 anti-tank missiles shipped to Iran.
November 2: American hostage David Jacobsen is released in Beirut.
November 3, 1986: Lebanese magazine "Al Shiraa" reports that the U.S. has sold arms to Iran. The Iranian government confirms the story. This marks the beginning of Iran-Contra.
November 13, 1986: In a nationally televised speech to defend against charges concerning arms sales to Iran, Reagan admits sending some defensive weapons and spare parts to Iran, but denies it was part of an arms for hostages deal. "Our government has a firm policy not to capitulate to terrorist demands.... We did not -- repeat, did not -- trade weapons or anything else for hostages, nor will we."
November 21, 1986: Attorney General Meese is asked to conduct an inquiry of the Iran affair to get facts straight.
November 22, 1986: Meese's office discovers the Iran-Contra connection. When searching North’s office, they found a memo dated 4/4/86 from North to Poindexter, which included an amount that to be sent to the Contras from the profits of the Iran sales. North, who had spent the night shredding papers, later called the diversion of funds, "a neat idea."
November 24, 1986: Meese tells Reagan that some proceeds from the sale of arms to Iran went to the Contras. He is aware that the diversion of funds could mean impeachment for violation of the Boland Amendment.
November 25, 1986: National Security Advisor John Poindexter resigns and Oliver North is fired. In press conference, Meese announces Iran-Contra: $10m to $30m of profits from sale of U.S. arms to Iran had been diverted to Swiss bank accounts for use by Contra rebels in Nicaragua.
December 1, 1986: Reagan appoints the Tower Commission to review Iran Contra.
February 2, 1987: Reagan testifies to the Tower Board for a second time. His testimony is inconsistent and confused. The Board pointed out Reagan hadn’t known about August shipment of anti-tank missiles, but Reagan had said he DID know. When asked for an explanation, Reagan picked up a briefing memo he had been provided and read aloud: "If the question comes up at the Tower Board meeting, you might want to say that you were surprised."
February 26, 1987: The Tower Commission report is delivered to Reagan. The report could not link Reagan to diversion of funds from Iran to the Contras. But it concluded that Reagan allowed the trade of arms to Iran for hostages held in Lebanon and pursued a secret war against the Nicaraguan government.
March 4, 1987: On national television, Reagan acknowledges mistakes on Iran-Contra. "A few months ago I told the American people I did not trade arms for hostages. As the Tower Board reported, what began as a strategic opening to Iran deteriorated, in its implementation, into trading arms for hostages.”
August 3, 1987: Congress completes its public hearings on Iran-Contra. "We may never know with precision or truth why it ever happened”.
On Christmas Eve 1992, President George Bush pardoned former Defense Secretary Weinberger, former national security adviser Robert McFarlane and four other officials linked to the Iran-Contra affair.
The action by the outgoing president closed the book on Independent Counsel Lawrence Walsh's investigation into the Iran-Contra scandal. At the time, Walsh considered Bush to be a subject of the investigation. (George HW Bush personally attended many of the NSC meetings, and the President himself attended a few as well.) The pardons sparked widespread criticism, including a comment from then-President-elect Clinton, who expressed concern that Bush's actions sent a signal that certain people were above the law.
15 years later, his son George W Bush ordered the National Archives to withhold 68,000 pages of Reagan administration documents, including papers belonging to his father, who was then the VP. Nobody knows whether this paperwork includes anything germane to the Iran-Contra scandal. Perhaps we will never know.
Proclamation 6518
Grant of Executive Clemency
December 24, 1992
By the President of the United States of America
A Proclamation
NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE BUSH, President of the United States of America, pursuant to my powers under Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution, do hereby grant a full, complete, and unconditional pardon to Elliott Abrams, Duane R. Clarridge, Alan Fiers, Clair George, Robert C. McFarlane, and Caspar W. Weinberger for all offenses charged or prosecuted by Independent Counsel Lawrence E. Walsh or other member of his office, or committed by these individuals and within the jurisdiction of that office.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-fourth day of December, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and ninety-two, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and seventeenth.
GEORGE BUSH
"I never knew anything above Cs."
--President Reagan, in a moment of truthfulness, describes his academic record to Barbara Walters, November 27, 1981
"All the waste in a year from a nuclear power plant can be stored under a desk."
--Ronald Reagan (Republican candidate for president), quoted in the Burlington (Vermont) Free Press, February 15, 1980. (In reality, the average nuclear reactor generates 30 tons of radioactive waste per year.)
"I have flown twice over Mount St. Helens. I'm not a scientist and I don't know the figures, but I have a suspicion that one little mountain out there, in these last several months, has probably released more sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere than has been released in the last ten years of automobile driving or things of that kind."
--Ronald Reagan, quoted in Time magazine, October 20, 1980. (According to scientists, Mount St. Helens emitted about 2,000 tons of sulfur dioxide per day at its peak activity, compared with 81,000 tons per day produced by cars.)
"Growing and decaying vegetation in this land are responsible for 93 percent of the oxides of nitrogen."
--Ronald Reagan, quoted in the Los Angeles Times, October 9, 1980. (According to Dr. Michael Oppenheimer of the Environmental Defense Fund, industrial sources are responsible for at least 65 percent and possibly as much as 90 percent of the oxides of nitrogen in the U.S.)
"Approximately 80 percent of our air pollution stems from hydrocarbons released by vegetation. So let's not go overboard in setting and enforcing tough emission standards for man-made sources."
--Ronald Reagan, quoted in Sierra, September 10, 1980
"Trains are not any more energy efficient than the average automobile, with both getting about 48 passenger miles to the gallon."
--Ronald Reagan, quoted in the Chicago Tribune, May 10, 1980. (The U.S. Department of Transportation calculates that a 14-car train traveling at 80 miles per hour gets 400 passenger miles to the gallon. A 1980 auto carrying an average of 2.2 people gets 42.6 passenger miles to the gallon.)
"I have a feeling that we are doing better in the war [in Vietnam] than the people have been told."
--Ronald Reagan, in the Los Angeles Times, October 16, 1967
"Because Vietnam was not a declared war, the veterans are not even eligible for the G. I. Bill of Rights with respect to education or anything."
--Ronald Reagan, in Newsweek, April 21, 1980.
"I favor the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and it must be enforced at the point of a bayonet, if necessary."
--Ronald Reagan, Los Angeles Times, October 20, 1965
"I would have voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964."
--Ronald Reagan, Los Angeles Times, June 17, 1966
"Politics is just like show business. You have a hell of an opening, coast for a while, and then have a hell of a close."
--Ronald Reagan to aide Stuart Spencer, 1966
Ronald Reagan, Bad Actor, Liar, Criminal, Corpse. The world is a better place.
02/06/1911 – 06/05/2004
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
kemble
RealPoor Sensei
Joined: 14 Oct 2002
Posts: 1909
Location: MI
|
|
Posted: 09/22/04 - 11:30 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Buckshot wrote: | | blah blah blah |
My guess: Age 16
WTG! Your whole timeline essentially backed up Krath's post. At no time did the US or Reagan himself hand a weapon to a terrorist and get a hostage in return. The shit at the end, doesn't even deserve a response.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Buckshot
Luke Warm
Joined: 14 Sep 2004
Posts: 449
|
|
Posted: 09/22/04 - 11:58 Post subject:
|
|
|
| kemble wrote: | | Buckshot wrote: | | blah blah blah |
My guess: Age 16
WTG! Your whole timeline essentially backed up Krath's post. At no time did the US or Reagan himself hand a weapon to a terrorist and get a hostage in return. The shit at the end, doesn't even deserve a response. |
July 18, 1985: Reagan approves National Security Advisor William McFarlane's plan to reach out to Iranian Foreign Minister Ghorbanifar. MacFarlane is interested in an opening with Iran through influence with moderates by helping Iran in war against Iraq. Reagan is more interested in using any influence gained through better relations to free hostages being held in Beirut by extremist Iranian terrorists.
March 4, 1987: On national television, Reagan acknowledges mistakes on Iran-Contra. "A few months ago I told the American people I did not trade arms for hostages. As the Tower Board reported, what began as a strategic opening to Iran deteriorated, in its implementation, into trading arms for hostages. "
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
khrath
Guest
|
|
Posted: 09/22/04 - 12:37 Post subject:
|
|
|
Reagan stood up as the one man calling the shots, told congress to f**k themselves, he went out, got the job done, and everyone loved him for it.
Thats all that needs to be said.
Back to our terrorists
Fact is, nothing bush can do will put a stop to what is going on. He can however make it much worse by adding even more of an american threat over there to clean up terrorists.....but oh, that wouldn't do anything but p**s the terrorists off even more, and cause MORE slaughtering of innocent people by the terrorists.
You people don't seem to see a few certain facts. Iraq isn't our country, we don't have american police patrolling the streets, we don't have the cia , the fbi, the nfl, nothing. It is another country being run by another country, and we are very limited by what we are allowed to do, and where we can go.
if it was going on in america, it'd be over with in a matter of hours.
Bush is doing a good job.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Conqueso
Luke Warm
Joined: 25 Jun 2003
Posts: 388
|
|
Posted: 09/22/04 - 12:42 Post subject:
|
|
|
Actually, Reagan was initially oblivious of the Iran Contra issue in the beginning. There was a good documentary on PBS about Reagan a couple months ago. When Reagan was told about the Iran Contra affair, his words were "Oh my God." His administration was responsible for starting the Iran Contra but not Reagan himself. People have the misconceived notion that Presidents know everything that is going on in an administration. That is not true. What is true is that the President is responsible for what occurs in his administration. Being responsible for what happens versus being the person that initially caused the problem are two different things.
Btw, the first thing put in big red bold text is actually an opinion and not a fact. The second section put in red bold text are facts since Reagan is quoted. What Reagan states makes sense considering what I wrote above. You need to be careful when making your own decisions based on opinion. It is easy to do so you need to make sure to dig further when trying to form your own opinion about an issue.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Buckshot
Luke Warm
Joined: 14 Sep 2004
Posts: 449
|
|
Posted: 09/22/04 - 17:25 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Conqueso wrote: | | You need to be careful when making your own decisions based on opinion. It is easy to do so you need to make sure to dig further when trying to form your own opinion about an issue. |
| Buckshot wrote: | Ronald Reagan, Bad Actor, Liar, Criminal, Corpse. The world is a better place.
02/06/1911 – 06/05/2004 |
indeed I forgot Adulterer, and Fornicator.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Pankrat
Can't Stop Posting
Joined: 12 Oct 2002
Posts: 603
Location: Land of Paranoia
|
|
Posted: 09/22/04 - 17:38 Post subject:
|
|
|
Buchshot = Jack Crow?
Created a new account to back himself up I guess. LOL.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posted: 09/22/04 - 17:50 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Pankrat wrote: | Buchshot = Jack Crow?
Created a new account to back himself up I guess. LOL. |
its the navy puke, thats my guess.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posted: 09/22/04 - 22:05 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Pankrat wrote: | Buchshot = Jack Crow?
Created a new account to back himself up I guess. LOL. |
No thanks, I dont need backup.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
khrath
Guest
|
|
Posted: 09/23/04 - 05:40 Post subject:
|
|
|
Seriously....not to talk bad about a dead person, but what the ffuck is up with these hostages going on camera and begging for their lives?
Do they not realize that they are going to be killed the second the camera gets turned off anyyways?
TERRORists.
key word is terror here folks, they want to scare the weak willed idiots back home into blaming someone whose fault it is not.
When you're going to die anyways, why the f**k would you want to horrify the entire world and make your families last memory of you, a video tape of you pleading for your life like a p***y?
Why in gods name would you want to make the public cry out over your stupid begging ass? Are you so special that you deserve more attention than the real soldiers who died in combat over there?
Having 10,000 bleading hearts crying "the government needs to do something about this!!!" is exactly what these people who spread nothing but terror want.
What is the difference between what these people do, and any normal war?
Answer is this, these people are not a formidable force, they can not make any real impact on anything, so they resort to making a specticle of someones death, to make it seem like some huge deal, when in fact, it's one person dieing, and makes little to no impact on things, other than on a personal level for the people who will be impacted by it.
Ask yourself.
How many of you went on crusades over the soldiers who died in the war like you do over hostages?
How many of you even give a shit that far worse things happen daily right where you live?
Seriously, you people need to stop doing EXACTLY what the terrorists want, and stop allowing them to become more than what they really are. YOU are causing more hostages to die, YOU encourage these people to kill more people in this fashion, YOU would have been a better choice of people to get their heads choppeed off.
My heart aches for orphans and starving children who don't have a choice.
While i do feel sorry for anyone who dies, these people asked to put their lives in danger, none of them were forced to go, they all knew the risks.
Those hostages are just one more statistic in a war to me.
i guess if it isn't a headline on cnn, none of you give a shit hu.
Our poloticians may not be able to sum it up as one more death, and they may have to act like they are all concerned, but I'm not limited as such, and i think the people who fall for this shit need to be slapped.
Spineless wastes of life
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Obmar
RealPoor Sensei
Joined: 22 Oct 2002
Posts: 1934
|
|
Posted: 09/25/04 - 16:12 Post subject:
|
|
|
more hostages have been released than killed
i'd beg for my f****n life too if i thought it had a chance to save me - do what your captors want, let the rest sort it out...
but i'm not a real heroic figure.
but i gotta tell you, i wouldnt be dishonoring any soldier's death by begging for my life - to be honest i'd probably be s******g and p*****g myself too.
Khrath man, you are HARDCORE!
semper fi and all that jazz
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Scrabler
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 2660
Location: Mobile, AL
|
|
Posted: 09/25/04 - 17:00 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Obmar wrote: | more hostages have been released than killed
i'd beg for my f****n life too if i thought it had a chance to save me - do what your captors want, let the rest sort it out...
but i'm not a real heroic figure.
but i gotta tell you, i wouldnt be dishonoring any soldier's death by begging for my life - to be honest i'd probably be s******g and p*****g myself too.
Khrath man, you are HARDCORE!
semper fi and all that jazz |
You might not dishonor them by begging for your life but you're dishonoring all Marines by signing off with Semper Fidelis.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Conqueso
Luke Warm
Joined: 25 Jun 2003
Posts: 388
|
|
Posted: 09/25/04 - 17:35 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Quote: | | Do what your captors want, let the rest sort it out... |
Heh, and that is the main difference between Kerry and Bush. Kerry would say and do whatever to please anyone. Bush is stubborn and stands firm. He could care less about polls. (couldnt resist doing that jab  )
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Zab
Sir Postalot
Joined: 07 Mar 2003
Posts: 1222
|
|
Posted: 09/26/04 - 14:48 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Scrabler wrote: | | Obmar wrote: | more hostages have been released than killed
i'd beg for my f****n life too if i thought it had a chance to save me - do what your captors want, let the rest sort it out...
but i'm not a real heroic figure.
but i gotta tell you, i wouldnt be dishonoring any soldier's death by begging for my life - to be honest i'd probably be s******g and p*****g myself too.
Khrath man, you are HARDCORE!
semper fi and all that jazz |
You might not dishonor them by begging for your life but you're dishonoring all Marines by signing off with Semper Fidelis. |
are you even old enough to enlist? lol
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Scrabler
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 2660
Location: Mobile, AL
|
|
Posted: 09/26/04 - 14:57 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Zab wrote: | | Scrabler wrote: | | Obmar wrote: | more hostages have been released than killed
i'd beg for my f****n life too if i thought it had a chance to save me - do what your captors want, let the rest sort it out...
but i'm not a real heroic figure.
but i gotta tell you, i wouldnt be dishonoring any soldier's death by begging for my life - to be honest i'd probably be s******g and p*****g myself too.
Khrath man, you are HARDCORE!
semper fi and all that jazz |
You might not dishonor them by begging for your life but you're dishonoring all Marines by signing off with Semper Fidelis. |
are you even old enough to enlist? lol |
I'm enlisting next year when I graduate.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Zab
Sir Postalot
Joined: 07 Mar 2003
Posts: 1222
|
|
Posted: 09/26/04 - 17:03 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Scrabler wrote: | | Zab wrote: | | Scrabler wrote: | | Obmar wrote: | more hostages have been released than killed
i'd beg for my f****n life too if i thought it had a chance to save me - do what your captors want, let the rest sort it out...
but i'm not a real heroic figure.
but i gotta tell you, i wouldnt be dishonoring any soldier's death by begging for my life - to be honest i'd probably be s******g and p*****g myself too.
Khrath man, you are HARDCORE!
semper fi and all that jazz |
You might not dishonor them by begging for your life but you're dishonoring all Marines by signing off with Semper Fidelis. |
are you even old enough to enlist? lol |
I'm enlisting next year when I graduate. |
hmm, the term " wannabe " comes to mind...
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Scrabler
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 2660
Location: Mobile, AL
|
|
Posted: 09/26/04 - 17:36 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Zab wrote: | | Scrabler wrote: | | Zab wrote: | | Scrabler wrote: | | Obmar wrote: | more hostages have been released than killed
i'd beg for my f****n life too if i thought it had a chance to save me - do what your captors want, let the rest sort it out...
but i'm not a real heroic figure.
but i gotta tell you, i wouldnt be dishonoring any soldier's death by begging for my life - to be honest i'd probably be s******g and p*****g myself too.
Khrath man, you are HARDCORE!
semper fi and all that jazz |
You might not dishonor them by begging for your life but you're dishonoring all Marines by signing off with Semper Fidelis. |
are you even old enough to enlist? lol |
I'm enlisting next year when I graduate. |
hmm, the term " wannabe " comes to mind... |
Yeah I'm a wannabe till I join..doesn't change the fact that he shouldn't sign off with semper fi.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Zab
Sir Postalot
Joined: 07 Mar 2003
Posts: 1222
|
|
Posted: 09/26/04 - 21:02 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Scrabler wrote: | | Zab wrote: | | Scrabler wrote: | | Zab wrote: | | Scrabler wrote: | | Obmar wrote: | more hostages have been released than killed
i'd beg for my f****n life too if i thought it had a chance to save me - do what your captors want, let the rest sort it out...
but i'm not a real heroic figure.
but i gotta tell you, i wouldnt be dishonoring any soldier's death by begging for my life - to be honest i'd probably be s******g and p*****g myself too.
Khrath man, you are HARDCORE!
semper fi and all that jazz |
You might not dishonor them by begging for your life but you're dishonoring all Marines by signing off with Semper Fidelis. |
are you even old enough to enlist? lol |
I'm enlisting next year when I graduate. |
hmm, the term " wannabe " comes to mind... |
Yeah I'm a wannabe till I join..doesn't change the fact that he shouldn't sign off with semper fi. |
so do you, look at your sig lately? maybe you should watch what you say before you prove yourself to be a hypocrit
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Scrabler
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 2660
Location: Mobile, AL
|
|
Posted: 09/26/04 - 21:04 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Zab wrote: | | Scrabler wrote: | | Zab wrote: | | Scrabler wrote: | | Zab wrote: | | Scrabler wrote: | | Obmar wrote: | more hostages have been released than killed
i'd beg for my f****n life too if i thought it had a chance to save me - do what your captors want, let the rest sort it out...
but i'm not a real heroic figure.
but i gotta tell you, i wouldnt be dishonoring any soldier's death by begging for my life - to be honest i'd probably be s******g and p*****g myself too.
Khrath man, you are HARDCORE!
semper fi and all that jazz |
You might not dishonor them by begging for your life but you're dishonoring all Marines by signing off with Semper Fidelis. |
are you even old enough to enlist? lol |
I'm enlisting next year when I graduate. |
hmm, the term " wannabe " comes to mind... |
Yeah I'm a wannabe till I join..doesn't change the fact that he shouldn't sign off with semper fi. |
so do you, look at your sig lately? maybe you should watch what you say before you prove yourself to be a hypocrit |
I don't use it, it's just a pic.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Zab
Sir Postalot
Joined: 07 Mar 2003
Posts: 1222
|
|
Posted: 09/26/04 - 21:10 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Scrabler wrote: | | Zab wrote: | | Scrabler wrote: | | Zab wrote: | | Scrabler wrote: | | Zab wrote: | | Scrabler wrote: | | Obmar wrote: | more hostages have been released than killed
i'd beg for my f****n life too if i thought it had a chance to save me - do what your captors want, let the rest sort it out...
but i'm not a real heroic figure.
but i gotta tell you, i wouldnt be dishonoring any soldier's death by begging for my life - to be honest i'd probably be s******g and p*****g myself too.
Khrath man, you are HARDCORE!
semper fi and all that jazz |
You might not dishonor them by begging for your life but you're dishonoring all Marines by signing off with Semper Fidelis. |
are you even old enough to enlist? lol |
I'm enlisting next year when I graduate. |
hmm, the term " wannabe " comes to mind... |
Yeah I'm a wannabe till I join..doesn't change the fact that he shouldn't sign off with semper fi. |
so do you, look at your sig lately? maybe you should watch what you say before you prove yourself to be a hypocrit |
I don't use it, it's just a pic. |
its a signature. you sign every message with it. You have not earned it therefore by your logic you should not use it. hypocrit
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posted: 09/26/04 - 21:28 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Zab wrote: | | Scrabler wrote: | | Zab wrote: | | Scrabler wrote: | | Zab wrote: | | Scrabler wrote: | | Zab wrote: | | Scrabler wrote: | | Obmar wrote: | more hostages have been released than killed
i'd beg for my f****n life too if i thought it had a chance to save me - do what your captors want, let the rest sort it out...
but i'm not a real heroic figure.
but i gotta tell you, i wouldnt be dishonoring any soldier's death by begging for my life - to be honest i'd probably be s******g and p*****g myself too.
Khrath man, you are HARDCORE!
semper fi and all that jazz |
You might not dishonor them by begging for your life but you're dishonoring all Marines by signing off with Semper Fidelis. |
are you even old enough to enlist? lol |
I'm enlisting next year when I graduate. |
hmm, the term " wannabe " comes to mind... |
Yeah I'm a wannabe till I join..doesn't change the fact that he shouldn't sign off with semper fi. |
so do you, look at your sig lately? maybe you should watch what you say before you prove yourself to be a hypocrit |
I don't use it, it's just a pic. |
its a signature. you sign every message with it. You have not earned it therefore by your logic you should not use it. hypocrit |
He doesn't use it with sarcasm or disrespect, as did the idiot he was correcting.
You need to pay more attention.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
