The time now is 10/13/08 - 19:27
Log in: Username: Password:
Search forums for:
  

Hillary is safe bet for Prez '08

Post new topic   Reply to topic
Author Message
Teutates
Luke Warm
Luke Warm


Joined: 12 Sep 2004
Posts: 232
Location: At her computer



PostPosted: 11/04/04 - 21:07    Post subject: Hillary is safe bet for Prez '08 Reply with quote

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/910300.cms

http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,11293442%255E401,00.html

http://www.petitiononline.com/hillary/petition.html
Back to top
xammer99
Luke Warm
Luke Warm


Joined: 14 Mar 2003
Posts: 336



PostPosted: 11/04/04 - 21:34    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hillary will go for it if the democratic party turns stupid again in '08.

Why? Because you don't get extremists elected their first time out, and Hillary is most definately an extremists. Granted, wierd things happen, but the election history of the past 20 years bears this out. You win your first time out by going to the middle and being the most middle.

Its called political economics...learn it, live it, love it.

To have even a snowballs chance in hell, Hillary will have to do a _LOT_ of history rewriting. This was one of Kerry's problems, overcoming being an extremist in his voting record.

For those who don't understand political economics btw, here is a rough one. The electorate falls on a bell curve with the left and the right on their respective ends of the continuum. The closer you get to the peak of the curve the more votes you'll get. By default you will get all of those to your back, and then increasingly edge out your oppontent by being more centrist than he is. Thats why Bush & Gore looked and sounded so similiar in 2000 and Kerry tried to out Bush, Bush this time around. That wasn't kerry trying to be conservative, just to move as far to the right as he could to eat up more of that continuum.

This of course gets complicated by 3rd party candidates who are more extremist than the mainstream candidate in every case in the past 20 years. They eat up the respective base they represent. For instance Perot destroyed a HUGE chunk of GHWBush's base, while Nader took a very small but statistically important part of Kerry's base.

Pretty simple, but its why everyone runs for the middle and for first times out its better to have no history (GW Bush) than a long history (Kerry), because you can shape yourself into a much more successful candidate.
Back to top
Frax
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8489
Location: Fuck yoiu fucking fuckers



PostPosted: 11/04/04 - 21:51    Post subject: Reply with quote

Actually the one big thing against her (other than being a wacko and female) is that only 3 of 43 presidents have ever been elected with only legislative governing experience. Its the same uphill climb kerry couldn't get over.
Back to top
Buckshot
Luke Warm
Luke Warm


Joined: 14 Sep 2004
Posts: 449



PostPosted: 11/04/04 - 22:01    Post subject: Reply with quote

Frax wrote:
only 3 of 43 presidents have ever been elected with only legislative governing experience.


interesting fact, if such.
Back to top
Obmar
RealPoor Sensei
RealPoor Sensei


Joined: 22 Oct 2002
Posts: 1934



PostPosted: 11/05/04 - 00:33    Post subject: Reply with quote

Obama for the win
Back to top
Akronn
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8752



PostPosted: 11/05/04 - 00:44    Post subject: Reply with quote

I read alot about the theory Xammer points out here during the Clinton/Dole election and it definately rings true.

Also, I don't think a senator has much of a chance to win these days. They have too much of a past, voting records are just ripe for attack. This elimates Hillary, Frist, McCain (god, the GOP would never let him win the primaries anyways) etc.

Look to the governors, our next president is coming from that pool.
Back to top
xammer99
Luke Warm
Luke Warm


Joined: 14 Mar 2003
Posts: 336



PostPosted: 11/05/04 - 13:43    Post subject: Reply with quote

Actually its 2 senators who have gone straight from the Senate to the White House. The last was Kennedy in 1960 and he BARELY won, only put in by the first use of electoral targeting tactics. This doesn't mean senators can't be presidents, but that they have to generally be vice presidents first, and its also a rare vice president who goes on to president.

In the past 100+ years only 1, may be 2, has gone straight from VP to President.

Roosevelt: Vp to President, but got it by virtue of McKinley's death.

Sherman: Didn't run for president in 1916 when he would have been eligable after he and Taft were beat in 1912.

Marshall: Didn't run for President in 1920 when he would have been elligble.

Coolidge: Vp to President, but got President by virtue of Harding's death.

Dawes: Hoover swept the Republican primaries, so no presidential bid.

Curtis: The Depression doomed Curtis as much as it did Hoover, so no presidential bid in 1936 which would have been his first chance since Hoover ran for reelection in 32.

The other VP's for FDR that no one remembers: None even tried.

Truman: Vp to President, but got President by virtue of FDR's death.

Nixon: Vp to President, but lost in 60 and had to wait till 68. So arguably a choice, but because of the time difference probably not applicable.

Johnson: Vp to President, but got President by virtue of JFK's death.

Humphrey: Failed to win election in 1968.

Agnew: Resigned.

Ford: Vp to President, but got President by virtue of Nixon's resignation.

Mondale: Failed to win election in 1984.

GHW Bush: Only candidate to go straight from VP to President without time off.

Gore: Failed to win election in 2000.

My personal theory on this is it again comes down to personal history. If there is to much to overcome you can't get yourself close enough to the center for the win.
Back to top
xammer99
Luke Warm
Luke Warm


Joined: 14 Mar 2003
Posts: 336



PostPosted: 11/05/04 - 13:50    Post subject: Reply with quote

Btw, pay attention to Hillary's voting record for the next 2 years. If she starts moderating her votes, she's going to run. Not sure if I agree with the analysis of her modifying her dress code to appear more "traditional", but she will absolutely modify her voting. You will also see a noticable visibility increase nationwide because she's a Clinton and will easily be able to get the media time. Also, I wouldn't be surprised if she puts out another book just to make sure attention stays focused on her.

Also, as a 1 term senator she might think she's safe enough to do it. The last guy to do it had 6 years in Congress and 8 in the Senate but had new tactics to play on. She has a new twist in being a former first lady and a very small actual political history. So she might think she can reinvent herself sufficiently to win.
Back to top
Teutates
Luke Warm
Luke Warm


Joined: 12 Sep 2004
Posts: 232
Location: At her computer



PostPosted: 11/06/04 - 05:51    Post subject: Reply with quote

xammer99 wrote:

Also, as a 1 term senator she might think she's safe enough to do it. The last guy to do it had 6 years in Congress and 8 in the Senate but had new tactics to play on. She has a new twist in being a former first lady and a very small actual political history. So she might think she can reinvent herself sufficiently to win.


I think this is the spin she's going to try. She has a unique position in the fact that she HAS seen teh presidency from the inside. She basically has 8 yrs xp in the seat already. and i think that will be to her advantage. Whats going to hurt her is that her attitudes are so .. how shall i say. . strong =)
Back to top
Qienn
Luke Warm
Luke Warm


Joined: 13 Oct 2002
Posts: 182



PostPosted: 11/06/04 - 09:00    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hillary would make John Kerry look like a good candidate. Unlike Bill, Hillary isn't likable to most of America. Most people think of her as an elitist b***h.
Back to top
Brash
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 20 Oct 2002
Posts: 3958



PostPosted: 11/06/04 - 16:53    Post subject: Reply with quote

id sooner vote for kbarr than her
Back to top
Scrabler
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 2660
Location: Mobile, AL



PostPosted: 11/06/04 - 16:54    Post subject: Reply with quote

It would be cool calling Bill the First Man.
Back to top
Silvermouse
RealPoor Jedi
RealPoor Jedi


Joined: 12 Oct 2002
Posts: 11015



PostPosted: 11/06/04 - 17:51    Post subject: Reply with quote

If she runs, we'll be forced to sit through more discussions about Whitewater and Vince Foster's suicide. Does anyone really want that to happen?
Back to top
Brael
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 2122



PostPosted: 11/06/04 - 18:36    Post subject: Reply with quote

But, but, but, what about the scandals where the first man is screwing the interns!?!?!?!?!?
Back to top
rosie
Can't Stop Posting
Can't Stop Posting


Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Posts: 665



PostPosted: 11/06/04 - 18:51    Post subject: Reply with quote

Qienn wrote:
Unlike Bill, Hillary isn't likable to most of America. Most people think of her as an elitist b***h.


Exactly why she'd get my vote.

Seriously though, I just want Darrell Hammond to have a job again.
Back to top
Jarec
Luke Warm
Luke Warm


Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 123



PostPosted: 11/08/04 - 03:21    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hillary would all-in-all be a two for the price of one president. Bill's influence would no doubt be lurking in the shadows.

It's a sad matter of fact that Senator Hillary Clinton is basically the only candidate that the democrats have a hope in hell of getting elected in '08. The trouble is that assuming she won the nomination, she'd most likely be running up against Senator John McCain (most likely choice for the Republican presidential ticket in '08).

Hillary can't win for two reasons. The first being that the United States as a whole doesn't appear to be ready yet for a woman president and John McCain would win much more cross party support than Hillary would.
Back to top
Aluaeia
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 06 Jun 2003
Posts: 5670



PostPosted: 11/08/04 - 04:26    Post subject: Reply with quote

I sooner vote for the f*****g Fascist party dude than Hillary Clinton.

Fortunately since I tend to vote Libertarian, I won't have to deal with those facist nutjobs.
Back to top
Nahualli
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8461



PostPosted: 11/08/04 - 04:29    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hillary Clinton will have been the only American President to have served 4 terms.

-Nah-
Back to top
Teutates
Luke Warm
Luke Warm


Joined: 12 Sep 2004
Posts: 232
Location: At her computer



PostPosted: 11/08/04 - 08:00    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nahualli wrote:
Hillary Clinton will have been the only American President to have served 4 terms.

-Nah-


uhm *cough*

President Franklin Delanor Roosevelt -- which initiated the 22nd amendment
Back to top
Silvermouse
RealPoor Jedi
RealPoor Jedi


Joined: 12 Oct 2002
Posts: 11015



PostPosted: 11/08/04 - 13:02    Post subject: Reply with quote

Teutates wrote:
Nahualli wrote:
Hillary Clinton will have been the only American President to have served 4 terms.

-Nah-


uhm *cough*

President Franklin Delanor Roosevelt -- which initiated the 22nd amendment


To be fair, FDR served for 3.25 terms, as he died in 1945.
Back to top
Scrabler
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 2660
Location: Mobile, AL



PostPosted: 11/08/04 - 18:06    Post subject: Reply with quote

Silvermouse wrote:
Teutates wrote:
Nahualli wrote:
Hillary Clinton will have been the only American President to have served 4 terms.

-Nah-


uhm *cough*

President Franklin Delanor Roosevelt -- which initiated the 22nd amendment


To be fair, FDR served for 3.25 terms, as he died in 1945.


Yeah..you can be Pres for 10 years really. You get 2 elected terms but you can also add on 2 years if you moved up from VP. If you go over 2 years it counts as a term though.
Back to top
Nictathan
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 5531
Location: here... where I am... not with you



PostPosted: 11/08/04 - 18:19    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm with whoever said Obama we need a black pres
Back to top
Scrabler
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 2660
Location: Mobile, AL



PostPosted: 11/08/04 - 18:27    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nictathan wrote:
I'm with whoever said Obama we need a black pres


Laughing

No black man or any woman would win in 2008..maybe in a few elections but certainly not now.
Back to top
Nictathan
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 5531
Location: here... where I am... not with you



PostPosted: 11/08/04 - 18:31    Post subject: Reply with quote

Scrabler wrote:
Nictathan wrote:
I'm with whoever said Obama we need a black pres


Laughing

No black man or any woman would win in 2008..maybe in a few elections but certainly not now.


I hope he does just to p**s your redneck racist ass off
Back to top
Nahualli
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8461



PostPosted: 11/08/04 - 18:32    Post subject: Reply with quote

Scrabler wrote:
Nictathan wrote:
I'm with whoever said Obama we need a black pres


Laughing

No black man or any woman would win in 2008..maybe in a few elections but certainly not now.


Correct, we have to wait for a few more generations of rednecks to die out first Smile

-Nah-
Back to top
quotison
RealPoor Sensei
RealPoor Sensei


Joined: 13 Oct 2002
Posts: 1594



PostPosted: 11/08/04 - 18:33    Post subject: Reply with quote

Barack Obama will not run in 2008, he said on Meet the Press yesterday that he was absoultely going to serve out his full six year term Smile
Back to top
Scrabler
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 2660
Location: Mobile, AL



PostPosted: 11/08/04 - 18:34    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nictathan wrote:
Scrabler wrote:
Nictathan wrote:
I'm with whoever said Obama we need a black pres


Laughing

No black man or any woman would win in 2008..maybe in a few elections but certainly not now.


I hope he does just to p**s your redneck racist ass off


Yeah I'd hate a black man in office, but that's not my point. As much as liberals like to think America is kind and open we are pretty far off from seeing a female/minority Pres.
Back to top
Nictathan
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 5531
Location: here... where I am... not with you



PostPosted: 11/08/04 - 18:35    Post subject: Reply with quote

quotison wrote:
Barack Obama will not run in 2008, he said on Meet the Press yesterday that he was absoultely going to serve out his full six year term Smile


Oh I was pretty sure he wasn't running, I just want it to be a possibility so a******s like Scrabler p**s and moan
Back to top
Nahualli
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8461



PostPosted: 11/08/04 - 18:35    Post subject: Reply with quote

Scrabler wrote:
As much as liberals like to think America is kind and open we are pretty far off from seeing a female/minority Pres.


Hahaha.. I don't understand how you can make statements like this and not kick yourself in the ass.

We aren't ready for a female or black President BECAUSE OF PEOPLE LIKE YOU.

-Nah-
Back to top
xammer99
Luke Warm
Luke Warm


Joined: 14 Mar 2003
Posts: 336



PostPosted: 11/08/04 - 18:35    Post subject: Reply with quote

Obama still makes me chuckle. He's declared a bright spot for the Dems, yet when it comes down to it, his election was an absolute gimme. Ryan drops out and Obama gets handed the election in a walk b/c Keyes decides its a good idea to repeatedly put his foot in his mouth and he's effectively a complete outsider to Illinois voters. Plus it was an open seat, its not like Obama was challenging anyone. Ah well, the media has to have some democrat to hype up to keep the troops from cryin to hard.

Honestly, I'd be happier over Reid were I a democrat, finally a leader for you guys in the senate that might be able to raise the senatorial democratic profile above something other than contrarian obstructionism. If you think Daschel's antics didn't hurt you, you are very mistaken.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Goto page 1, 2   Next
Page 1 of 2

Related topics:
Hillary stamp
Hillary racist against Indians
Romney or Huckabee and/or Obama and hillary
The Hillary in 2008 thread
If Hillary Clinton every became president?
Hillary Vs. The X-Box: Game Over
YAY HILLARY IN 2008!!!!
Hillary