|
|
| Author |
Message |
Occulis
RealPoor Jedi
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 13293
Location: Moral Relativity Central
|
 Posted: 03/06/05 - 14:36 Post subject: Hey Eduin, lol, remember that 1 time
|
|
|
I tried to chat with you in EQ! Lol! You kept buffing your friends! Lol! And you wouldn't chat.  I was so sad. I mean it cut. It cut.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
kbarr
RealPoor Jedi
Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Posts: 11239
Location: New York, now go fuck off...
|
|
Posted: 03/06/05 - 14:45 Post subject:
|
|
|
He never gave me a strength buff. I must have asked him hundreds of times. I would even ask him where we were in diffent places. It would be like...Hmmm, time to ask shithead for a str buff, then BAM!, I would.
I also asked for blood puddings, but he never sent me one.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Occulis
RealPoor Jedi
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 13293
Location: Moral Relativity Central
|
|
Posted: 03/06/05 - 14:46 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
What is a blood pudding?
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
kbarr
RealPoor Jedi
Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Posts: 11239
Location: New York, now go fuck off...
|
|
Posted: 03/06/05 - 14:59 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Occulis wrote: | | What is a blood pudding? |
They make this mixture of blood and assorted minced up body parts, random animals I think. Then they call it food. The scots/english, irish do this instead of starving I read once.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Occulis
RealPoor Jedi
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 13293
Location: Moral Relativity Central
|
|
Posted: 03/06/05 - 15:11 Post subject:
|
|
|
:O :O :O
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Yabden
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 13 Oct 2002
Posts: 2485
Location: Ohio
|
|
Posted: 03/06/05 - 16:38 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
blood pudding sounds pretty damn tasty
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Luturb
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 4042
Location: Livermore, California
|
|
Posted: 03/06/05 - 16:42 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
I ran into Ed once in the nexus. I was like "OMG he is real!".
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Mugaaz
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 3576
|
|
Posted: 03/06/05 - 17:03 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
While he was always "that shaman who didnt buff" he was pretty competent. A lot more then you can say for most.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
kbarr
RealPoor Jedi
Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Posts: 11239
Location: New York, now go fuck off...
|
|
Posted: 03/06/05 - 17:30 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Mugaaz wrote: | | While he was always "that shaman who didnt buff" he was pretty competent. A lot more then you can say for most. |
Competent but wrong. I remember when he was spouting off about how str meant nothing beyond you ability to carry.
He was wrong.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Baha
Sir Postalot
Joined: 12 Oct 2002
Posts: 1214
|
|
Posted: 03/06/05 - 19:21 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
its actually called black pudding, not blood, and its made with (sp) congealed pigs blood. no body parts I dont believe. Haggas is where the nastiness is, and he is a scott.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Docter
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 21 Oct 2002
Posts: 3420
|
|
Posted: 03/06/05 - 19:29 Post subject:
|
|
|
He invited me up to PoH to test out a new combat tactic with BL, it was fun, I died a few times, but it was a BLAST. 
He knew his stuff in EQ1...so did BL.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Gethy
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 5595
Location: Tallahassee, FL
|
|
Posted: 03/06/05 - 22:55 Post subject:
|
|
|
STR didn't mean anything but weight (disregarding monks) and a negligible DPS increase in EQ1 while he was a buff nazi.
He was right.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
|
Posted: 03/06/05 - 23:20 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Gethy wrote: | STR didn't mean anything but weight (disregarding monks) and a negligible DPS increase in EQ1 while he was a buff nazi.
He was right. |
Str did give you a tiny increase in dps back then when the max was 255 but the increase was so insignificant that it wasnt worth the mana.
Stamina was the shit...stamina is probably still the shit although its alot easier to max stam nowdays
I remeber giving ed shit over not buffing str but yeah he was pretty much right.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
wellspoken
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 7137
|
|
Posted: 03/07/05 - 15:51 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Jack Crow wrote: | | Gethy wrote: | STR didn't mean anything but weight (disregarding monks) and a negligible DPS increase in EQ1 while he was a buff nazi.
He was right. |
Str did give you a tiny increase in dps back then when the max was 255 but the increase was so insignificant that it wasnt worth the mana.
Stamina was the shit...stamina is probably still the shit although its alot easier to max stam nowdays
I remeber giving ed shit over not buffing str but yeah he was pretty much right. |
str helped a good bit..
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Brael
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 2122
|
|
Posted: 03/07/05 - 15:54 Post subject:
|
|
|
| wellspoken wrote: | | Jack Crow wrote: | | Gethy wrote: | STR didn't mean anything but weight (disregarding monks) and a negligible DPS increase in EQ1 while he was a buff nazi.
He was right. |
Str did give you a tiny increase in dps back then when the max was 255 but the increase was so insignificant that it wasnt worth the mana.
Stamina was the shit...stamina is probably still the shit although its alot easier to max stam nowdays
I remeber giving ed shit over not buffing str but yeah he was pretty much right. |
str helped a good bit.. |
If you were weighed down, then maybe.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
kbarr
RealPoor Jedi
Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Posts: 11239
Location: New York, now go fuck off...
|
|
Posted: 03/07/05 - 15:59 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Brael wrote: | | wellspoken wrote: | | Jack Crow wrote: | | Gethy wrote: | STR didn't mean anything but weight (disregarding monks) and a negligible DPS increase in EQ1 while he was a buff nazi.
He was right. |
Str did give you a tiny increase in dps back then when the max was 255 but the increase was so insignificant that it wasnt worth the mana.
Stamina was the shit...stamina is probably still the shit although its alot easier to max stam nowdays
I remeber giving ed shit over not buffing str but yeah he was pretty much right. |
str helped a good bit.. |
If you were weighed down, then maybe. |
Before you scored good gear str meant everything to a DE. It totally controlled how I did things. Everything was in the bank, I carried a lot of nothing except that crappy umbral armor.
Str was VERY important if you drove a weak toon.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
wellspoken
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 7137
|
|
Posted: 03/07/05 - 16:10 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Brael wrote: | | wellspoken wrote: | | Jack Crow wrote: | | Gethy wrote: | STR didn't mean anything but weight (disregarding monks) and a negligible DPS increase in EQ1 while he was a buff nazi.
He was right. |
Str did give you a tiny increase in dps back then when the max was 255 but the increase was so insignificant that it wasnt worth the mana.
Stamina was the shit...stamina is probably still the shit although its alot easier to max stam nowdays
I remeber giving ed shit over not buffing str but yeah he was pretty much right. |
str helped a good bit.. |
If you were weighed down, then maybe. |
no, it helped damage.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Frehya
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 2398
|
|
Posted: 03/07/05 - 16:19 Post subject:
|
|
|
yes its good, noitsnot.... yes no yes no then..yes, but no......well maybe.....
I always figured if I had the mana and someone chose to play their toon that way, I'd give it to them. I drew the line at clerics that insisted on dex though.
Was nice when some buffs got combined into one spell and then everyone became maxed on most of stats with their gear anyway. Then no one wanted shaman to group with in GoD ...... hmm wanna dex buff? anyone? pls?
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Vekril
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 15 Oct 2002
Posts: 2525
Location: Jersey
|
|
Posted: 03/07/05 - 16:32 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Quote: | | Then no one wanted shaman to group with in GoD |
haha so true - all you needed was 1 person with a shaman bot -- buff Focus every 72 mins (maybe stamina also) Malos + Slow the mobs, then forget about the bot til next mob
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Brael
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 2122
|
|
Posted: 03/07/05 - 16:39 Post subject:
|
|
|
| wellspoken wrote: | | Brael wrote: | | wellspoken wrote: | | Jack Crow wrote: | | Gethy wrote: | STR didn't mean anything but weight (disregarding monks) and a negligible DPS increase in EQ1 while he was a buff nazi.
He was right. |
Str did give you a tiny increase in dps back then when the max was 255 but the increase was so insignificant that it wasnt worth the mana.
Stamina was the shit...stamina is probably still the shit although its alot easier to max stam nowdays
I remeber giving ed shit over not buffing str but yeah he was pretty much right. |
str helped a good bit.. |
If you were weighed down, then maybe. |
no, it helped damage. |
If by helped damage you mean raising your average hit extremly slightly as a side effect of raising the upper limit you could hit for without giving you an increased chance to hit that high (so the extra damage you could possibly hit for was mostly unused) then sure.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Nahualli
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8461
|
|
Posted: 03/07/05 - 16:42 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Kbarr wrote: | | Mugaaz wrote: | | While he was always "that shaman who didnt buff" he was pretty competent. A lot more then you can say for most. |
Competent but wrong. I remember when he was spouting off about how str meant nothing beyond you ability to carry.
He was wrong. |
Yep I used to run up to him and ask him for buffs on purpose because it cracked me up when he would start going off on his diatribe about how buffs are worthless.
-Nah-
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
wellspoken
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 7137
|
|
Posted: 03/07/05 - 16:44 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Brael wrote: | | wellspoken wrote: | | Brael wrote: | | wellspoken wrote: | | Jack Crow wrote: | | Gethy wrote: | STR didn't mean anything but weight (disregarding monks) and a negligible DPS increase in EQ1 while he was a buff nazi.
He was right. |
Str did give you a tiny increase in dps back then when the max was 255 but the increase was so insignificant that it wasnt worth the mana.
Stamina was the shit...stamina is probably still the shit although its alot easier to max stam nowdays
I remeber giving ed shit over not buffing str but yeah he was pretty much right. |
str helped a good bit.. |
If you were weighed down, then maybe. |
no, it helped damage. |
If by helped damage you mean raising your average hit extremly slightly as a side effect of raising the upper limit you could hit for without giving you an increased chance to hit that high (so the extra damage you could possibly hit for was mostly unused) then sure. |
well, playing a monk i could notice the dmg quite a bit.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Ciladar
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 15 Oct 2002
Posts: 3765
Location: Northern New Jersey
|
|
Posted: 03/07/05 - 18:28 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Kbarr wrote: | | Brael wrote: | | wellspoken wrote: | | Jack Crow wrote: | | Gethy wrote: | STR didn't mean anything but weight (disregarding monks) and a negligible DPS increase in EQ1 while he was a buff nazi.
He was right. |
Str did give you a tiny increase in dps back then when the max was 255 but the increase was so insignificant that it wasnt worth the mana.
Stamina was the shit...stamina is probably still the shit although its alot easier to max stam nowdays
I remeber giving ed shit over not buffing str but yeah he was pretty much right. |
str helped a good bit.. |
If you were weighed down, then maybe. |
Before you scored good gear str meant everything to a DE. It totally controlled how I did things. Everything was in the bank, I carried a lot of nothing except that crappy umbral armor.
Str was VERY important if you drove a weak toon. |
Unless you were retarded it was never that large of an issue. I played a HIE and put like 3 starting points into STR and outside of making a rather large deal in EC where you where carrying thousands of pp, it was hardly a problem.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
kbarr
RealPoor Jedi
Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Posts: 11239
Location: New York, now go fuck off...
|
|
Posted: 03/07/05 - 21:38 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Ciladar wrote: | | Kbarr wrote: | | Brael wrote: | | wellspoken wrote: | | Jack Crow wrote: | | Gethy wrote: | STR didn't mean anything but weight (disregarding monks) and a negligible DPS increase in EQ1 while he was a buff nazi.
He was right. |
Str did give you a tiny increase in dps back then when the max was 255 but the increase was so insignificant that it wasnt worth the mana.
Stamina was the shit...stamina is probably still the shit although its alot easier to max stam nowdays
I remeber giving ed shit over not buffing str but yeah he was pretty much right. |
str helped a good bit.. |
If you were weighed down, then maybe. |
Before you scored good gear str meant everything to a DE. It totally controlled how I did things. Everything was in the bank, I carried a lot of nothing except that crappy umbral armor.
Str was VERY important if you drove a weak toon. |
Unless you were retarded it was never that large of an issue. I played a HIE and put like 3 starting points into STR and outside of making a rather large deal in EC where you where carrying thousands of pp, it was hardly a problem. |
What class retard. Was it an armor based toon? I drove a DESK to 55, before they fixed experience, and a troll warrior to lv 62. Str meant everything early on, before all the good gear came out.
I am right, as always.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Ciladar
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 15 Oct 2002
Posts: 3765
Location: Northern New Jersey
|
|
Posted: 03/07/05 - 21:42 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Kbarr wrote: | | Ciladar wrote: | | Kbarr wrote: | | Brael wrote: | | wellspoken wrote: | | Jack Crow wrote: | | Gethy wrote: | STR didn't mean anything but weight (disregarding monks) and a negligible DPS increase in EQ1 while he was a buff nazi.
He was right. |
Str did give you a tiny increase in dps back then when the max was 255 but the increase was so insignificant that it wasnt worth the mana.
Stamina was the shit...stamina is probably still the shit although its alot easier to max stam nowdays
I remeber giving ed shit over not buffing str but yeah he was pretty much right. |
str helped a good bit.. |
If you were weighed down, then maybe. |
Before you scored good gear str meant everything to a DE. It totally controlled how I did things. Everything was in the bank, I carried a lot of nothing except that crappy umbral armor.
Str was VERY important if you drove a weak toon. |
Unless you were retarded it was never that large of an issue. I played a HIE and put like 3 starting points into STR and outside of making a rather large deal in EC where you where carrying thousands of pp, it was hardly a problem. |
What class retard. Was it an armor based toon? I drove a DESK to 55, before they fixed experience, and a troll warrior to lv 62. Str meant everything early on, before all the good gear came out.
I am right, as always. |
It was Ciladar, a HIE Paladin you idiot. What does having fixed the exp have to do with strength...at least stay on topic. If you carried around 20k in copper, than yes it was a problem, orther than that, you are wrong.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
kbarr
RealPoor Jedi
Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Posts: 11239
Location: New York, now go fuck off...
|
|
Posted: 03/07/05 - 22:19 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Ciladar wrote: | | Kbarr wrote: | | Ciladar wrote: | | Kbarr wrote: | | Brael wrote: | | wellspoken wrote: | | Jack Crow wrote: | | Gethy wrote: | STR didn't mean anything but weight (disregarding monks) and a negligible DPS increase in EQ1 while he was a buff nazi.
He was right. |
Str did give you a tiny increase in dps back then when the max was 255 but the increase was so insignificant that it wasnt worth the mana.
Stamina was the shit...stamina is probably still the shit although its alot easier to max stam nowdays
I remeber giving ed shit over not buffing str but yeah he was pretty much right. |
str helped a good bit.. |
If you were weighed down, then maybe. |
Before you scored good gear str meant everything to a DE. It totally controlled how I did things. Everything was in the bank, I carried a lot of nothing except that crappy umbral armor.
Str was VERY important if you drove a weak toon. |
Unless you were retarded it was never that large of an issue. I played a HIE and put like 3 starting points into STR and outside of making a rather large deal in EC where you where carrying thousands of pp, it was hardly a problem. |
What class retard. Was it an armor based toon? I drove a DESK to 55, before they fixed experience, and a troll warrior to lv 62. Str meant everything early on, before all the good gear came out.
I am right, as always. |
It was Ciladar, a HIE Paladin you idiot. What does having fixed the exp have to do with strength...at least stay on topic. If you carried around 20k in copper, than yes it was a problem, orther than that, you are wrong. |
I am right as always. I refuse to explain in detail the points I would bury you with if I still cared about this game. But I don't. Lets just do our regular thing, less typing for me.
You are an angry little manchild I would crush with one of my massively strong hands.
I am the guy who is always correct.
Lets move on from there.
/yawn
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
ATM Banana
RealPoor Master of Posts
Joined: 02 Jan 2003
Posts: 8575
|
|
Posted: 03/07/05 - 23:06 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
if what you say is absolute, then why do you argue?
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
kbarr
RealPoor Jedi
Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Posts: 11239
Location: New York, now go fuck off...
|
|
Posted: 03/07/05 - 23:57 Post subject:
|
|
|
| ATM Banana wrote: | | if what you say is absolute, then why do you argue? |
Link where I used the word absolute.
Go, now, FIND WHAT I REQUEST!
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Mugaaz
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 3576
|
|
Posted: 03/08/05 - 01:57 Post subject:
|
|
|
| wellspoken wrote: | | Brael wrote: | | wellspoken wrote: | | Jack Crow wrote: | | Gethy wrote: | STR didn't mean anything but weight (disregarding monks) and a negligible DPS increase in EQ1 while he was a buff nazi.
He was right. |
Str did give you a tiny increase in dps back then when the max was 255 but the increase was so insignificant that it wasnt worth the mana.
Stamina was the shit...stamina is probably still the shit although its alot easier to max stam nowdays
I remeber giving ed shit over not buffing str but yeah he was pretty much right. |
str helped a good bit.. |
If you were weighed down, then maybe. |
no, it helped damage. |
No it didn't. Brael already gave the explanation of how it raised it by 0.01%. What you noticed and the truth are two different things.
Ed was right about str. It was almost entirely useless.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
Ciladar
RealPoor Guru
Joined: 15 Oct 2002
Posts: 3765
Location: Northern New Jersey
|
|
Posted: 03/08/05 - 02:07 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Kbarr wrote: | | Ciladar wrote: | | Kbarr wrote: | | Ciladar wrote: | | Kbarr wrote: | | Brael wrote: | | wellspoken wrote: | | Jack Crow wrote: | | Gethy wrote: | STR didn't mean anything but weight (disregarding monks) and a negligible DPS increase in EQ1 while he was a buff nazi.
He was right. |
Str did give you a tiny increase in dps back then when the max was 255 but the increase was so insignificant that it wasnt worth the mana.
Stamina was the shit...stamina is probably still the shit although its alot easier to max stam nowdays
I remeber giving ed shit over not buffing str but yeah he was pretty much right. |
str helped a good bit.. |
If you were weighed down, then maybe. |
Before you scored good gear str meant everything to a DE. It totally controlled how I did things. Everything was in the bank, I carried a lot of nothing except that crappy umbral armor.
Str was VERY important if you drove a weak toon. |
Unless you were retarded it was never that large of an issue. I played a HIE and put like 3 starting points into STR and outside of making a rather large deal in EC where you where carrying thousands of pp, it was hardly a problem. |
What class retard. Was it an armor based toon? I drove a DESK to 55, before they fixed experience, and a troll warrior to lv 62. Str meant everything early on, before all the good gear came out.
I am right, as always. |
It was Ciladar, a HIE Paladin you idiot. What does having fixed the exp have to do with strength...at least stay on topic. If you carried around 20k in copper, than yes it was a problem, orther than that, you are wrong. |
I am right as always. I refuse to explain in detail the points I would bury you with if I still cared about this game. But I don't. Lets just do our regular thing, less typing for me.
You are an angry little manchild I would crush with one of my massively strong hands.
I am the guy who is always correct.
Lets move on from there.
/yawn |
'
You are such a joke. I guess everyone else in this thread is wrong, except you as always. You've been quite wrong a few times lately. What is it? Are you Loosing your touch Pillsbury?
BTW only someone so insecrure about their sorry excuse for a self, would be bragging as much as you do. Next time your at Wal-Mart buying an outfit, take a look in the mirrors they have hanging around. Maybe one day you'll see why your wife left your sorry ass and your son disowned you 
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
