The time now is 10/16/08 - 15:31
Log in: Username: Password:
Search forums for:
  

George W Bush

Post new topic   Reply to topic
Author Message
Tura
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 29 Oct 2003
Posts: 4865
Location: Raleigh, NC



PostPosted: 01/21/05 - 12:55    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you're relying on social security for your retirement then I would feel bad for you in the first place.

Theres plenty of other ways to plan for retirement rather than social security. I would suggest some type of IRA or long term CD.
Back to top
Qaldyin
Sir Postalot
Sir Postalot


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 1346



PostPosted: 01/21/05 - 13:35    Post subject: Reply with quote

IRAs yes. CDs are taxed on withdrawal.
Back to top
Dyers
Sir Postalot
Sir Postalot


Joined: 26 Oct 2002
Posts: 1269



PostPosted: 01/21/05 - 13:55    Post subject: Reply with quote

No retirement.

Nuclear Holocaust inc!!

Back to top
Kurel
RealPoor Sensei
RealPoor Sensei


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 1877
Location: Cali



PostPosted: 01/22/05 - 02:48    Post subject: Reply with quote

They need to scrap the SS program and stop taxing people twice for that b******t. If you're too stupid to save up for your own retirement, tough shit for you son.
Back to top
kbarr
RealPoor Jedi
RealPoor Jedi


Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Posts: 11239
Location: New York, now go fuck off...



PostPosted: 01/22/05 - 03:26    Post subject: Reply with quote

Galdaria wrote:
LOL Kbarr reminds me of my dad. My dad had a beer belly and a beard and loved guns. I remember one time I was like 10 years old my dad had to leave me alone and he gives me a f*****g shotgun and says.
Listen up, this is loaded. It has special bullets that spray on impact. If anyone comes here and tries to get in you just aim at them through the door. Dont open the door, just blast a f*****g hole right through it and them ok honey?

Remember, the safety isnt on so be careful.

f*****g crazy ass rednecks. Its a miracle I didnt blow my head off or something on accident.


I like how the stupid, liberal idiots in europe, canada and the US, all have the same talking points.

Guns are bad, this is just about the top one.

They will even go as far as to point out the idiots and genetic defects in their life, as examples of why humans should not be trusted with firearms.


Scabby, pops should have been clipped long before he spawned you. Passing on half of his obviously flawed genes was not exactly good for the race. It would be best, in the big picture, for you to just die out.
Back to top
Qaldyin
Sir Postalot
Sir Postalot


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 1346



PostPosted: 01/22/05 - 03:38    Post subject: Reply with quote

Guns are only bad when f*****g morons get their hands on them. Unfortunately, a lot of f*****g morons own guns.
Back to top
Frax
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8489
Location: Fuck yoiu fucking fuckers



PostPosted: 01/22/05 - 12:03    Post subject: Reply with quote

Qaldyin wrote:
Guns are only bad when f*****g morons get their hands on them. Unfortunately, a lot of f*****g morons own guns.


A lot of morons own cars. A lot of morons use drugs. A lot of morons drink alcohol. A lot of morons use use forks.
Back to top
Scrabler
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 2660
Location: Mobile, AL



PostPosted: 01/22/05 - 12:15    Post subject: Reply with quote

People who are anal about gun safty and afraid of accidently firing it shouldn't own one.
Back to top
Akronn
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8752



PostPosted: 01/22/05 - 12:17    Post subject: Reply with quote

Unfortunately, gun control is a lost cause. Too many of them, and the market for them is immense. If you want one, you got it. I think the penalties for gun related crimes should be alot tougher, though,

In the spirit of Kbarr's last post: by far the most ridiculous assertion conservatives make is that human actions don't adversely effect the environment. I love that one. There's nothing quite like hearing Rush Limbaugh prattle on about this subject, one in which he has no expertise in whatsoever.

Yep, Rush, greenhouse gases are harmless! Rolling Eyes
Back to top
Frax
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8489
Location: Fuck yoiu fucking fuckers



PostPosted: 01/22/05 - 12:46    Post subject: Reply with quote

Akronn wrote:
Unfortunately, gun control is a lost cause. Too many of them, and the market for them is immense. If you want one, you got it. I think the penalties for gun related crimes should be alot tougher, though,

In the spirit of Kbarr's last post: by far the most ridiculous assertion conservatives make is that human actions don't adversely effect the environment. I love that one. There's nothing quite like hearing Rush Limbaugh prattle on about this subject, one in which he has no expertise in whatsoever.

Yep, Rush, greenhouse gases are harmless! Rolling Eyes


He's just as much as expert as anyone posting on this message board.
Back to top
kireol
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 02 Aug 2003
Posts: 9517
Location: Royal Oak, MI



PostPosted: 01/22/05 - 12:52    Post subject: Reply with quote

Guns dont kill people. It's usually the bullets
Back to top
Akronn
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8752



PostPosted: 01/22/05 - 14:29    Post subject: Reply with quote

You're as far off as he is, Frax.
Back to top
Conqueso
Luke Warm
Luke Warm


Joined: 25 Jun 2003
Posts: 388



PostPosted: 01/22/05 - 15:49    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
In the spirit of Kbarr's last post: by far the most ridiculous assertion conservatives make is that human actions don't adversely effect the environment.

Heh I see idiocy on both "sides of the fence" Akronn. I personally follow the policy of "once it's gone, it's gone" and realize that there are a lot of people out there that do not realize this and have to be shown other ways of why it is important to protect things. For example, you have to prove why these resources are an asset and what economic advantages these assets can provide. It is not as "warm and fuzzy" as "protecting mother nature" but is a bit more practical since there are many people that think in terms of cost versus ideologies. Although I do not know exactly Rush's viewpoints on environmental topics, the assertion that you made, implying that conservatives think people make no impact on the environment, is incorrect. People are not the only impact and are not always the worst impact. As a result, "sealing off the environment" from people and commerce is not a completely viable or "solve all" approach.

With some environmental movements, I know that people can go way too extreme in their approach of dealing with the environment and, although they might have good intentions, actually cause more harm than good. For example, the strict environmental regulations in some regions of the western US prevented brush clearing. As a result, millions of acres of forest burned. In Texas, they use controlled burning to clear out mequite, juniper, and other non-indigenous plants in certain areas to prevent the choking off of native species. The process also clears out brush. It works. It was not started due to an environmental activist but instead by ranchers who have a vested interested in maintaining their land. Initially, the environmental groups were "up in arms" when it was first started, but they are pretty quiet about it now. The native species have come back and a lot of regions have become prime pasture for livestock grazing. It is a win-win situation and I wish this type of philosophy would be applied elsewhere instead of turning resources into a type of "museum".

Yes, people do have an impact on the environment but I believe it is not to the extreme some environmental groups like to imply since people tend to forget that nature, other animals, etc also make a big impact. We can't put the environment sealed off in a little box and say, "Dont touch." The environment is there for us to use but as we use it, we need to keep in mind that we are also its caretaker. It is the philosophy that the ranchers involved with the controlled burning in Texas follow (as well as in other parts of the country). Maintaining a good balance between the two is what is needed instead of taking things from one extreme to another.
Back to top
Melee
Luke Warm
Luke Warm


Joined: 24 Mar 2003
Posts: 185



PostPosted: 01/22/05 - 16:14    Post subject: Reply with quote

khrath wrote:
Voting for Kerry is like being an old person who get scammed by credit card insurance offers over the phone.....it makes you one of the stupidest and most gullible people on the planet.

no no no
i think what you mean is. "living in america" is like being an old person who gets scammed by credit card insurance offers over the phone....it makes you one of the stupidest and most gullible people on the planet.
Back to top
Frax
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8489
Location: Fuck yoiu fucking fuckers



PostPosted: 01/22/05 - 16:21    Post subject: Reply with quote

Akronn wrote:
You're as far off as he is, Frax.



I'm much closer to the truth than you, thats for sure.
Back to top
kbarr
RealPoor Jedi
RealPoor Jedi


Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Posts: 11239
Location: New York, now go fuck off...



PostPosted: 01/22/05 - 18:42    Post subject: Reply with quote

Akronn wrote:
You're as far off as he is, Frax.


Another stock boy under the age of 25 who knows more than everyone else?
Back to top
Akronn
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8752



PostPosted: 01/22/05 - 23:27    Post subject: Reply with quote

A.) I'm a chemist for an environmental consulting firm.
B.) I'm past 25. =/
Back to top
kbarr
RealPoor Jedi
RealPoor Jedi


Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Posts: 11239
Location: New York, now go fuck off...



PostPosted: 01/22/05 - 23:45    Post subject: Reply with quote

Akronn wrote:
A.) I'm a chemist for an environmental consulting firm.
B.) I'm past 25. =/


What f****d you up?
Back to top
Zonk
Toomuchtimeonhands
Toomuchtimeonhands


Joined: 02 Jan 2003
Posts: 976



PostPosted: 01/23/05 - 03:30    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
What f****d you up?


im gonna guess the chemicals
Back to top
Conqueso
Luke Warm
Luke Warm


Joined: 25 Jun 2003
Posts: 388



PostPosted: 01/23/05 - 13:29    Post subject: Reply with quote

You involved with minor new source review permits Akronn?
Back to top
Starks
Toomuchtimeonhands
Toomuchtimeonhands


Joined: 17 Oct 2002
Posts: 865



PostPosted: 01/24/05 - 03:08    Post subject: Reply with quote

Guns are not the problem of gun control. Gun education is the problem. Gun availibility in some states is a problem as well. Gun shows where you can show up and buy a semi-automatic assault rifle is ridiculous, but for the most part, legal guns cause very few deaths. Since most of these deaths occur to children is why gun education is important. Some hunting rifles in mid western states are a bit ridiculous as well, but since the hunting density is so low, there are not many hunting accidents. So to conclude, Gun Education and availibility of assault weapons are really the only problem with legal weapons.

Illegal arms is a whole different subject that really falls outside the realm of what the governments think of as "Gun Control"
Back to top
Qaldyin
Sir Postalot
Sir Postalot


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 1346



PostPosted: 01/24/05 - 03:47    Post subject: Reply with quote

What? Dude...Gun Control is about eliminating gun crimes. I.E. some d*****s buying a gun from a swap shop, or off the street, to go shoot the guy down the street.
Back to top
scrotum
Toomuchtimeonhands
Toomuchtimeonhands


Joined: 13 Oct 2002
Posts: 828



PostPosted: 01/24/05 - 06:09    Post subject: Reply with quote

Starks wrote:
Guns are not the problem of gun control. Gun education is the problem. Gun availibility in some states is a problem as well. Gun shows where you can show up and buy a semi-automatic assault rifle is ridiculous, but for the most part, legal guns cause very few deaths. Since most of these deaths occur to children is why gun education is important. Some hunting rifles in mid western states are a bit ridiculous as well, but since the hunting density is so low, there are not many hunting accidents. So to conclude, Gun Education and availibility of assault weapons are really the only problem with legal weapons.

Illegal arms is a whole different subject that really falls outside the realm of what the governments think of as "Gun Control"


Would there be dead kids if there weren't any guns?
Back to top
Ikkan
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 06 Sep 2003
Posts: 3086



PostPosted: 01/24/05 - 12:17    Post subject: Reply with quote

scrotum wrote:
Starks wrote:
Guns are not the problem of gun control. Gun education is the problem. Gun availibility in some states is a problem as well. Gun shows where you can show up and buy a semi-automatic assault rifle is ridiculous, but for the most part, legal guns cause very few deaths. Since most of these deaths occur to children is why gun education is important. Some hunting rifles in mid western states are a bit ridiculous as well, but since the hunting density is so low, there are not many hunting accidents. So to conclude, Gun Education and availibility of assault weapons are really the only problem with legal weapons.

Illegal arms is a whole different subject that really falls outside the realm of what the governments think of as "Gun Control"


Would there be dead kids if there weren't any guns?


Yes. Knives, Home-made explosions, Clubs, Sticks, Strangulation, Chains, etc.
Back to top
Herbgotti
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 14 Oct 2002
Posts: 2110



PostPosted: 01/26/05 - 15:14    Post subject: Re: George W Bush Reply with quote

Ciladar wrote:
Kbarr wrote:
Hail to the Chief.

/salute


4 MORE!



In that pic he is pondering how he won for a second time.


LOL, seriously. Everybody knows this mother f**k won because of his kin.
I just hope he cleans up his f**k ups that he made these past 4 years. I also REALLY hope he doesn't leave even more shit after his term..... /sigh... Go bush.....
Back to top
kbarr
RealPoor Jedi
RealPoor Jedi


Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Posts: 11239
Location: New York, now go fuck off...



PostPosted: 01/26/05 - 19:56    Post subject: Re: George W Bush Reply with quote

Herbgotti wrote:
Ciladar wrote:
Kbarr wrote:
Hail to the Chief.

/salute


4 MORE!



In that pic he is pondering how he won for a second time.


LOL, seriously. Everybody knows this mother f**k won because of his kin.
I just hope he cleans up his f**k ups that he made these past 4 years. I also REALLY hope he doesn't leave even more shit after his term..... /sigh... Go bush.....



LOL

Who won?
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Goto page Previous   1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

Related topics: