The time now is 07/24/08 - 03:33
Log in: Username: Password:
Search forums for:
  

Electoral Votes (Not a political thread)

Post new topic   Reply to topic
Author Message
Leilu
Sir Postalot
Sir Postalot


Joined: 12 Nov 2002
Posts: 1164



PostPosted: 10/11/04 - 13:15    Post subject: Electoral Votes (Not a political thread) Reply with quote

So why do we have electoral votes? Doesn't popular vote make more sense? Anyone anyone?
Back to top
khrath
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8750



PostPosted: 10/11/04 - 13:16    Post subject: Reply with quote

ROCK TEH VOTE!@!
Back to top
Spitulski
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 23 Nov 2002
Posts: 4344
Location: Washington



PostPosted: 10/11/04 - 13:23    Post subject: Reply with quote

DUDE, GET OFF YOUR ASS AND TURN OFF THE TV AND VOTE, MAN! IT'S SO COOL TO DO IT NOW, IT'S NOT JUST FOR OLD PEOPLE AND STUFF.
Back to top
quotison
RealPoor Sensei
RealPoor Sensei


Joined: 13 Oct 2002
Posts: 1594



PostPosted: 10/11/04 - 13:31    Post subject: Reply with quote

The framers of the constitution did not want the president elected directly by the people. I think it made sense back then, when it would be unlikely that an average person knew a lot about national candidates for president, due to the slow movement of information.

These days, I don't think it makes any sense. The 'winner take all' mechanism that all but two states (Maine and New Hampshire) use seems to make voters in a lot of states a non-factor. Also the electoral college system gives more weight to votes in small states, since electoral votes are not proportional to population, but rather based on the number of Congress seats (which means every state gets at least three, due to each state having at least two senate seats and one house seat no matter population)
Back to top
Luturb
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 4043
Location: Livermore, California



PostPosted: 10/11/04 - 13:52    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree somewhat. I think they should drop the all or nothing by state part of the electoral college, and let them be divided up. I think Colorado is actually doing that this year.

I don't think going to a pure popular vote would be a good idea though. The electoral college is just as valid as it was in it's first days. If it were a popular vote then the candidates could just say s***w 80% of the country and suck up to people in LA, SF, NY, and Boston and win.

Check out the Bush vs. Gore votes by county:



All that red, yet gore won the popular vote. Without the electoral college, a tiny fraction of the country (the big cities) totally dominates the election. They still do really, but not by as much as they would without the electoral college.

More states should split up their electoral votes by population though, so conservative areas like central CA or liberal areas like South Texas could be counted instead of those states always going 100% republican or democrat.


Last edited by Luturb on 10/11/04 - 13:55; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Dyers
Sir Postalot
Sir Postalot


Joined: 26 Oct 2002
Posts: 1269



PostPosted: 10/11/04 - 13:53    Post subject: Reply with quote

Imagine that presidential elections were not decided state-by-state, but rather by a nationwide popular vote. The significance of states and the candidates' competition for support in key, "swing" states would disappear. Candidates would be inclined to simply run nationwide ad campaigns and visit large population centers.

http://www.thisnation.com/question/051.html

The small states were given additional power to prevent politicians from only focusing on issues which affect the larger states. The fear was that without this power, politicians would only focus on the big states and major cities.

http://www.fairvote.org/e_college/problems.htm

http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/electoralcoll.htm
Back to top
Frax
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8489
Location: Fuck yoiu fucking fuckers



PostPosted: 10/11/04 - 13:55    Post subject: Reply with quote

Luturb wrote:
I agree somewhat. I think they should drop the all or nothing by state part of the electoral college, and let them be divided up. I think Colorado is actually doing that this year.

I don't think going to a pure popular vote would be a good idea though. If that were the case then the candidates could just say s***w 80% of the country and suck up to people in LA, SF, NY, and Boston and win.

Check out the Bush vs. Gore votes by county:



All that red, yet gore won the popular vote. Without the electoral college, a tiny fraction of the country (the big cities) totally dominates the election. They still do really, but not by as much as they would without the electoral college.


Colorado is voting on changing the electoral votes into more percentage based. If you get 50% ofthe vote you get 50% of the electoral votes, etc.

I'll see if i can find the info.. as with anything there is vocal opposition to it from whoever's panties it caused to wad up. I think mainly because the guy who suggested it , is really a california transplant to Colorado.. (like 50% of the populatoin is)
Back to top
Luturb
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 4043
Location: Livermore, California



PostPosted: 10/11/04 - 13:58    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hehe, and no matter what state you're in, at least in the west, everybody blames California imports for screwing everything up.

Last edited by Luturb on 10/11/04 - 13:59; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Buckshot
Luke Warm
Luke Warm


Joined: 14 Sep 2004
Posts: 449



PostPosted: 10/11/04 - 13:59    Post subject: Re: Electoral Votes (Not a political thread) Reply with quote

Leilu wrote:
So why do we have electoral votes? Doesn't popular vote make more sense? Anyone anyone?


we need constitutional changes to the election process and for the staffing of our defense and security agencies, ect.

the age of information has changed everything and the old systems have falling into the 'dark ages'
Back to top
Silvermouse
RealPoor Jedi
RealPoor Jedi


Joined: 12 Oct 2002
Posts: 11015



PostPosted: 10/11/04 - 13:59    Post subject: Reply with quote

There are a total of 633 people in that entire red mess.
Back to top
Buckshot
Luke Warm
Luke Warm


Joined: 14 Sep 2004
Posts: 449



PostPosted: 10/11/04 - 14:10    Post subject: Reply with quote

Silvermouse wrote:
There are a total of 633 people in that entire red mess.


all of which are cousins, and they are still inter-breeding

"Hey Paw! can me and cuzin luUrleen Geet hitch'd when she turns 12? "

"sure thing boy! just like ye'r maw & I deed"
Back to top
Frax
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8489
Location: Fuck yoiu fucking fuckers



PostPosted: 10/11/04 - 14:18    Post subject: Reply with quote

Frax wrote:
Luturb wrote:
I agree somewhat. I think they should drop the all or nothing by state part of the electoral college, and let them be divided up. I think Colorado is actually doing that this year.

I don't think going to a pure popular vote would be a good idea though. If that were the case then the candidates could just say s***w 80% of the country and suck up to people in LA, SF, NY, and Boston and win.

Check out the Bush vs. Gore votes by county:



All that red, yet gore won the popular vote. Without the electoral college, a tiny fraction of the country (the big cities) totally dominates the election. They still do really, but not by as much as they would without the electoral college.


Colorado is voting on changing the electoral votes into more percentage based. If you get 50% ofthe vote you get 50% of the electoral votes, etc.

I'll see if i can find the info.. as with anything there is vocal opposition to it from whoever's panties it caused to wad up. I think mainly because the guy who suggested it , is really a california transplant to Colorado.. (like 50% of the populatoin is)


http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/election/article/0,1299,DRMN_36_3200813,00.html

This was one relatively unbiased article on it. To be honest it is not much on the news in Colorado. We instead get to listen to Pete Coors (yes the guy from the beer commercials) and Ken Salazar rip each other to shreds in advertisements and debates. Its kinda like a mini presidential election.. GWB is even flying in today to wave the colors for Coors.
Back to top
Luturb
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 4043
Location: Livermore, California



PostPosted: 10/11/04 - 14:23    Post subject: Reply with quote

You gotta support a guy that makes beer, even if it's watered down weak yellow beer. Or is he a watered-down weak yellow candidate too?
Back to top
lotek
RealPoor Sensei
RealPoor Sensei


Joined: 12 Oct 2002
Posts: 1598



PostPosted: 10/11/04 - 14:28    Post subject: Reply with quote

If it was a popular vote, then la, new york, houston and pheonix would decided for everyone else.

consider it affirmitive action for the smaller states.
Back to top
Frax
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8489
Location: Fuck yoiu fucking fuckers



PostPosted: 10/11/04 - 14:29    Post subject: Reply with quote

They are both fairly annoying. I haven't made up my mind but salazar has reportedly taken money from an anti-defense organisation. That will be enough for me to vote the other way most likely.

I always wondered where people access all this campaign contribution info.
Back to top
atarom
Dalai Lama of RealPoor
Dalai Lama of RealPoor


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 16398
Location: 375th st. Y



PostPosted: 10/11/04 - 14:35    Post subject: Reply with quote

lotek wrote:
If it was a popular vote, then la, new york, houston and pheonix would decided for everyone else.

consider it affirmitive action for the smaller states.


I think that is the most flawed argument I've ever heard.
Back to top
Rennol
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 3741
Location: Charleston, IL



PostPosted: 10/11/04 - 14:42    Post subject: Reply with quote

fagarom wrote:
lotek wrote:
If it was a popular vote, then la, new york, houston and pheonix would decided for everyone else.

consider it affirmitive action for the smaller states.


I think that is the most flawed argument I've ever heard.


no shit. everyone forgets chicago.
Back to top
Leilu
Sir Postalot
Sir Postalot


Joined: 12 Nov 2002
Posts: 1164



PostPosted: 10/11/04 - 14:51    Post subject: Reply with quote

It seems like your vote would actually directly count if it was popular. So I live in Missouri, which is by definition a "swing" state. Luckily this year, we've had alot of attention from the press and both candidates. My state has 2 somewhat large cities on both east and west borders surrounding a whole bunch of white-trash and back woods cousin lovers in the middle. Unfortunately, the cousin loving white trash picks which way my state goes every 4 years because they can reproduce faster than they can put on a condom.

Of course I want to contribute to the idea of democracy as much as possible, and in doing so see the importance of voting, but I can't help but think that my vote doesn't count when as soon as I've cast it, some cousin lover in Troy has already cancelled out my ballot.
Back to top
Rennol
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 3741
Location: Charleston, IL



PostPosted: 10/11/04 - 14:58    Post subject: Reply with quote

Leilu wrote:
It seems like your vote would actually directly count if it was popular. So I live in Missouri, which is by definition a "swing" state. Luckily this year, we've had alot of attention from the press and both candidates. My state has 2 somewhat large cities on both east and west borders surrounding a whole bunch of white-trash and back woods cousin lovers in the middle. Unfortunately, the cousin loving white trash picks which way my state goes every 4 years because they can reproduce faster than they can put on a condom.

Of course I want to contribute to the idea of democracy as much as possible, and in doing so see the importance of voting, but I can't help but think that my vote doesn't count when as soon as I've cast it, some cousin lover in Troy has already cancelled out my ballot.


My uncle lives in Missouri. One of the smartest people I know (along with his brother). Excellent lawyer. Very witty, humorous. A diehard Bush/Republican supporter.

I wonder if he would change his party affiliation if I reminded him that all the uneducated white trash idiots love Bush. Why he would put himself in with them is... strange.

It's just ironic that both the most ignorant and most wealthy segments of society in this country tend to gravitate towards the same end of the political spectrum.
Back to top
Obmar
RealPoor Sensei
RealPoor Sensei


Joined: 22 Oct 2002
Posts: 1934



PostPosted: 10/11/04 - 15:02    Post subject: Reply with quote

Frax wrote:
They are both fairly annoying. I haven't made up my mind but salazar has reportedly taken money from an anti-defense organisation. That will be enough for me to vote the other way most likely.

I always wondered where people access all this campaign contribution info.


Coor makes really s****y beer - that would be enough for me to vote for the other guy
Back to top
Frax
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8489
Location: Fuck yoiu fucking fuckers



PostPosted: 10/11/04 - 15:04    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rennol wrote:
Leilu wrote:
It seems like your vote would actually directly count if it was popular. So I live in Missouri, which is by definition a "swing" state. Luckily this year, we've had alot of attention from the press and both candidates. My state has 2 somewhat large cities on both east and west borders surrounding a whole bunch of white-trash and back woods cousin lovers in the middle. Unfortunately, the cousin loving white trash picks which way my state goes every 4 years because they can reproduce faster than they can put on a condom.

Of course I want to contribute to the idea of democracy as much as possible, and in doing so see the importance of voting, but I can't help but think that my vote doesn't count when as soon as I've cast it, some cousin lover in Troy has already cancelled out my ballot.


My uncle lives in Missouri. One of the smartest people I know (along with his brother). Excellent lawyer. Very witty, humorous. A diehard Bush/Republican supporter.

I wonder if he would change his party affiliation if I reminded him that all the uneducated white trash idiots love Bush. Why he would put himself in with them is... strange.

It's just ironic that both the most ignorant and most wealthy segments of society in this country tend to gravitate towards the same end of the political spectrum.


way to generalize, stupid ass.

There are rich people for bush. There are rich people for kerry.
There are poor people for bush. There are poor people for kerry.
Back to top
Rennol
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 3741
Location: Charleston, IL



PostPosted: 10/11/04 - 15:17    Post subject: Reply with quote

Frax wrote:
Rennol wrote:
Leilu wrote:
It seems like your vote would actually directly count if it was popular. So I live in Missouri, which is by definition a "swing" state. Luckily this year, we've had alot of attention from the press and both candidates. My state has 2 somewhat large cities on both east and west borders surrounding a whole bunch of white-trash and back woods cousin lovers in the middle. Unfortunately, the cousin loving white trash picks which way my state goes every 4 years because they can reproduce faster than they can put on a condom.

Of course I want to contribute to the idea of democracy as much as possible, and in doing so see the importance of voting, but I can't help but think that my vote doesn't count when as soon as I've cast it, some cousin lover in Troy has already cancelled out my ballot.


My uncle lives in Missouri. One of the smartest people I know (along with his brother). Excellent lawyer. Very witty, humorous. A diehard Bush/Republican supporter.

I wonder if he would change his party affiliation if I reminded him that all the uneducated white trash idiots love Bush. Why he would put himself in with them is... strange.

It's just ironic that both the most ignorant and most wealthy segments of society in this country tend to gravitate towards the same end of the political spectrum.


way to generalize, stupid ass.

There are rich people for bush. There are rich people for kerry.
There are poor people for bush. There are poor people for kerry.


I know I was generalizing, that's why I said "tend to".. "gravitate towards"...

It is a documented fact that the top 1% of income earners are overwhelmingly Republican-oriented in their political orientation, as is the rural South. You're the one that loves to show off "all that red"!

If I had said "OMG ALL HICKS R REPUBLICOS N SO R RICH FUCKRS"

then, yeah, you would have had a point
Back to top
Yellow Journalist
RealPoor Sensei
RealPoor Sensei


Joined: 20 Oct 2002
Posts: 1973



PostPosted: 10/11/04 - 15:18    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kerry and Bush should draw straws for Presidency
Back to top
Frax
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8489
Location: Fuck yoiu fucking fuckers



PostPosted: 10/11/04 - 15:24    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rennol wrote:
Frax wrote:
Rennol wrote:
Leilu wrote:
It seems like your vote would actually directly count if it was popular. So I live in Missouri, which is by definition a "swing" state. Luckily this year, we've had alot of attention from the press and both candidates. My state has 2 somewhat large cities on both east and west borders surrounding a whole bunch of white-trash and back woods cousin lovers in the middle. Unfortunately, the cousin loving white trash picks which way my state goes every 4 years because they can reproduce faster than they can put on a condom.

Of course I want to contribute to the idea of democracy as much as possible, and in doing so see the importance of voting, but I can't help but think that my vote doesn't count when as soon as I've cast it, some cousin lover in Troy has already cancelled out my ballot.


My uncle lives in Missouri. One of the smartest people I know (along with his brother). Excellent lawyer. Very witty, humorous. A diehard Bush/Republican supporter.

I wonder if he would change his party affiliation if I reminded him that all the uneducated white trash idiots love Bush. Why he would put himself in with them is... strange.

It's just ironic that both the most ignorant and most wealthy segments of society in this country tend to gravitate towards the same end of the political spectrum.


way to generalize, stupid ass.

There are rich people for bush. There are rich people for kerry.
There are poor people for bush. There are poor people for kerry.


I know I was generalizing, that's why I said "tend to".. "gravitate towards"...

It is a documented fact that the top 1% of income earners are overwhelmingly Republican-oriented in their political orientation, as is the rural South. You're the one that loves to show off "all that red"!

If I had said "OMG ALL HICKS R REPUBLICOS N SO R RICH FUCKRS"

then, yeah, you would have had a point


My point was valid.. you are a stupid ass.
Back to top
Leilu
Sir Postalot
Sir Postalot


Joined: 12 Nov 2002
Posts: 1164



PostPosted: 10/11/04 - 15:32    Post subject: Reply with quote

Whoa fellas! I was just saying that no matter what their decision is, it sucks that the cast of Deliverance represents my ENTIRE state. Just seems more relevant for my vote to go the candidate I choose, not to try and fight over some imaginary "electoral votes" within the state.
Back to top
Frax
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8489
Location: Fuck yoiu fucking fuckers



PostPosted: 10/11/04 - 15:37    Post subject: Reply with quote

Leilu wrote:
Whoa fellas! I was just saying that no matter what their decision is, it sucks that the cast of Deliverance represents my ENTIRE state. Just seems more relevant for my vote to go the candidate I choose, not to try and fight over some imaginary "electoral votes" within the state.


You are correct. However a popular vote would basically end up the same way as 2000, or worse.
Back to top
lotek
RealPoor Sensei
RealPoor Sensei


Joined: 12 Oct 2002
Posts: 1598



PostPosted: 10/11/04 - 16:05    Post subject: Reply with quote

fagarom wrote:
lotek wrote:
If it was a popular vote, then la, new york, houston and pheonix would decided for everyone else.

consider it affirmitive action for the smaller states.


I think that is the most flawed argument I've ever heard.


would you care to explain how its flawed, when in fact its the reason for it?
Back to top
Occulis
RealPoor Jedi
RealPoor Jedi


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 13293
Location: Moral Relativity Central



PostPosted: 10/11/04 - 16:11    Post subject: Reply with quote

"f**k me, Santa! f**k me, Santa! f**k me, Santa! f**k me, Santa! f**k me, Santa! f**k me, Santa! f**k me, Santa! f**k me, Santa!"

-- Bad Santa scene
Back to top
Leilu
Sir Postalot
Sir Postalot


Joined: 12 Nov 2002
Posts: 1164



PostPosted: 10/11/04 - 16:12    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hahahaha. I totally cried at the wooden pickle. What a sucker.
Back to top
Akronn
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8752



PostPosted: 10/11/04 - 17:57    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting, Rennol brings up a point I was discussing with my mother just yesterday. Basically, what in the hell happened to the Republican party? It wasn't the NASCAR party even during the Reagan administration... and now look.

It looked like there was a rift forming within the party in the early 90's with Perot and Pat Buchanan taking their pieces. In order to survive, party leaders adopted the Christian Coalition's platform and essentially absorbed that faction. It's been downhill ever since, they get more irrational by the day.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Goto page 1, 2   Next
Page 1 of 2

Related topics:
Electoral Map Repost - Cause it's cool (and it was hidden)
This guy's chin qualifies for an Electoral Vote!
The guy behind www.electoral-vote.com
Make your own electoral college predictions
Electoral College
If each county in the US counted as 1 electoral vote...
Bush pulls ahead in electoral vote
Political Remix's (Songs). This is pretty interesting.
I can't tell if this is political either
Political and Election Chat was deffinatly a good thing....
Politically Correct
Political forum?
This is a political thread
New Political Site
Kbarr.. a political question..
Political Forum : READ
Nice List of Political Web Sites
Should we have a political forum
Speaking of crazy political things...
Political Spam
Political Compass-where do you stand?
Who is your least favorite RP Political Pundit?
Facebook's "Take a stand".. Political issues
Political(sorta) personality quiz
Political Correctness gone too far... again
OK political sensitivity has gone too fucking far...
Political Correctness in the UK -- scary shit
I'm real proud of myself (drug/booze thread)
WTT [H][EU][PVP] Hunter 70 for [H][A]see thread) on PvE [EU]
Tell a joke (couldn't find other thread)
Use the Force Kbarr (The Official Kbarr Pic Mod Thread)
I'm in Heaven (Lame Public Radio Thread) NWS... wtf

 





Warning: fopen(/home/sites/realpoor.com/htdocs/test_cache/Electoral_Votes__Not_a_political_thread__t30529.html) [function.fopen]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/sites/realpoor.com/htdocs/includes/page_tail.php on line 171

Warning: fwrite(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /home/sites/realpoor.com/htdocs/includes/page_tail.php on line 172

Warning: fclose(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /home/sites/realpoor.com/htdocs/includes/page_tail.php on line 173