The time now is 09/18/08 - 17:10
Log in: Username: Password:
Search forums for:
  

Chocolate City

Post new topic   Reply to topic
Author Message
motherface
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 12 Mar 2003
Posts: 3407



PostPosted: 01/18/06 - 12:19    Post subject: Chocolate City Reply with quote

Maybe old news by now, but this guy is such a f*****g retard. There's other video around, including one in which he says he meant that chocolate was "dark chocolate and white milk."

http://thepoliticalteen.net/2006/01/16/naginchocolatepeople/
Back to top
sinrakin
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 7044



PostPosted: 01/18/06 - 12:59    Post subject: Re: Chocolate City Reply with quote

motherface wrote:
Maybe old news by now, but this guy is such a f*****g retard. There's other video around, including one in which he says he meant that chocolate was "dark chocolate and white milk."

http://thepoliticalteen.net/2006/01/16/naginchocolatepeople/

He might be a retard, but I didn't even think twice when I read his quote yesterday. It seemed immediately obvious that when he said "chocolate" he meant a mixture of brown and white; that's the first thing that occurred to me. I think some people get off on taking things the wrong way.
Back to top
Jukas
Toomuchtimeonhands
Toomuchtimeonhands


Joined: 19 Mar 2003
Posts: 896



PostPosted: 01/18/06 - 13:01    Post subject: Reply with quote

or how about Hilarity Cliton saying that "congress was like working on a plantation"?

Quote is paraphrased, cause I'm too lazy to look up the exact quote
Back to top
Soriak
Toomuchtimeonhands
Toomuchtimeonhands


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 952



PostPosted: 01/18/06 - 13:02    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, it was featured on the daily show.

He apparently meant chocolate as in the drink - which is made with black chocolate and white milk... probably got some heat and looked for a way out.

I was very surprised when I heard him say that - just imagine someone making a comment remotely like that about whites instead of blacks.

Also funny was Hillary Clinton comparing the leadership of the house of representatives to plantations and she said "and you know what I mean..." to an all black audience. No one knew, and Al Sharpton had to explain it - classic.
Back to top
sinrakin
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 7044



PostPosted: 01/18/06 - 13:06    Post subject: Reply with quote

Soriak wrote:
Also funny was Hillary Clinton comparing the leadership of the house of representatives to plantations and she said "and you know what I mean..." to an all black audience. No one knew, and Al Sharpton had to explain it - classic.

That was pretty lame of her to steal Newt Gingrich's line from the Republicans. When he was running for speaker, he said he was leading a “slave rebellion” against the Democrats who “run the plantation.” She should try to come up with her own material.
Back to top
Frax
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8489
Location: Fuck yoiu fucking fuckers



PostPosted: 01/18/06 - 15:30    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jukas wrote:
or how about Hilarity Cliton saying that "congress was like working on a plantation"?

Quote is paraphrased, cause I'm too lazy to look up the exact quote


But she's the champion of the left, she can do no wrong. Lefties are doomed in 2008.
Back to top
Baha
Sir Postalot
Sir Postalot


Joined: 12 Oct 2002
Posts: 1214



PostPosted: 01/18/06 - 15:38    Post subject: Reply with quote

nothing changes then, I guess, cause they're already clutching their torn a******s right now, along with the rest of the world.
Back to top
Zimzulu
Toomuchtimeonhands
Toomuchtimeonhands


Joined: 02 Dec 2005
Posts: 883



PostPosted: 01/18/06 - 15:45    Post subject: Reply with quote

Prays




Save us please!
Back to top
kbarr
RealPoor Jedi
RealPoor Jedi


Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Posts: 11239
Location: New York, now go fuck off...



PostPosted: 01/18/06 - 16:16    Post subject: Re: Chocolate City Reply with quote

sinrakin wrote:
motherface wrote:
Maybe old news by now, but this guy is such a f*****g retard. There's other video around, including one in which he says he meant that chocolate was "dark chocolate and white milk."

http://thepoliticalteen.net/2006/01/16/naginchocolatepeople/

He might be a retard, but I didn't even think twice when I read his quote yesterday. It seemed immediately obvious that when he said "chocolate" he meant a mixture of brown and white; that's the first thing that occurred to me. I think some people get off on taking things the wrong way.


Look, we know you are stupid.

Why keep proving it.

I mean honestly, everyone in the world knows exactly what he meant by "chocolate". Are you trying to say you have never heard this slang term before? Are you?

Please....


The other way your statement can be looked at is, as an obfuscation, essentially a lie. And a bad one at that.




You know what he meant, just like parliament knew what they meant in 1975.

You liar, you stupid liberal liar.




Quote:
Parliament Lyrics - Chocolate City Lyrics (1975)


Uh, what's happening CC?
They still call it the White House
But that's a temporary condition, too.
Can you dig it, CC?

To each his reach
And if I don't cop, it ain't mine to have
But I'll be reachin' for ya
'Cause I love ya, CC.
Right on.

There's a lot of chocolate cities, around
We've got Newark, we've got Gary
Somebody told me we got L.A.
And we're working on Atlanta
But you're the capital, CC

Gainin' on ya!
Get down
Gainin' on ya!
Movin' in and on ya
Gainin' on ya!
Can't you feel my breath, heh
Gainin' on ya!
All up around your neck, heh heh

Hey , CC!
They say your jivin' game, it can't be changed
But on the positive side,
You're my piece of the rock
And I love you, CC.
Can you dig it?

Hey, uh, we didn't get our forty acres and a mule
But we did get you, CC, heh, yeah
Gainin' on ya
Movin' in and around ya
God bless CC and its vanilla suburbs

Gainin' on ya!
Gainin' on ya!
Gainin' on ya! (heh!)
Gainin' on ya!
Gainin' on ya!
What's happening, blood?
Gainin' on ya!
Gainin' on ya!
Gainin' on ya!

Yeah!
What's happening, black?
Brother black, blood even
Yeah-ahh, just funnin'

Gettin' down

Ah, blood to blood
Ah, players to ladies
The last percentage count was eighty
You don't need the bullet when you got the ballot
Are you up for the downstroke, CC?
Chocolate city
Are you with me out there?

And when they come to march on ya
Tell 'em to make sure they got their James Brown pass
And don't be surprised if Ali is in the White House
Reverend Ike, Secretary of the Treasure
Richard Pryor, Minister of Education
Stevie Wonder, Secretary of FINE arts
And Miss Aretha Franklin, the First Lady
Are you out there, CC?
A chocolate city is no dream
It's my piece of the rock and I dig you, CC
God bless Chocolate City and its (gainin' on ya!) vanilla suburbs
Can y'all get to that?
Gainin' on ya!
Gainin' on ya!
Easin' in
Gainin' on ya!
In yo' stuff
Gainin' on ya!
Huh, can't get enough
Gainin' on ya!
Gainin' on ya!
Be mo' funk, be mo' funk
Gainin' on ya!
Can we funk you too
Gainin' on ya!
Right on, chocolate city!

Yeah, get deep
Real deep
Heh
Be mo' funk
Mmmph, heh
Get deep
Bad
Unh, heh
Just got New York, I'm told
Back to top
kbarr
RealPoor Jedi
RealPoor Jedi


Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Posts: 11239
Location: New York, now go fuck off...



PostPosted: 01/18/06 - 16:40    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.realpoor.com/viewtopic.php?t=43045&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0
Back to top
kireol
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 02 Aug 2003
Posts: 9517
Location: Royal Oak, MI



PostPosted: 01/18/06 - 20:15    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm pretty sure sinrakin was expressing some sarcasm. Damn funny sarcasm too.
Back to top
kbarr
RealPoor Jedi
RealPoor Jedi


Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Posts: 11239
Location: New York, now go fuck off...



PostPosted: 01/18/06 - 20:45    Post subject: Reply with quote

kireol wrote:
I'm pretty sure sinrakin was expressing some sarcasm. Damn funny sarcasm too.


pretty sure?

damn funny?
Back to top
Nuldaan
Sir Postalot
Sir Postalot


Joined: 07 Nov 2002
Posts: 1179



PostPosted: 01/18/06 - 20:52    Post subject: Reply with quote

sinrakin wrote:
That was pretty lame of her to steal Newt Gingrich's line from the Republicans. When he was running for speaker, he said he was leading a “slave rebellion” against the Democrats who “run the plantation.” She should try to come up with her own material.


Except that Newt Gingrich wasn't speaking to an all-black audience either. If Democrats and racial leaders are going to keep insisting that words mean different things based on the audience, then they have to accept that it goes both ways.
Back to top
motherface
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 12 Mar 2003
Posts: 3407



PostPosted: 01/18/06 - 21:00    Post subject: Reply with quote

kbarr wrote:
kireol wrote:
I'm pretty sure sinrakin was expressing some sarcasm. Damn funny sarcasm too.


pretty sure?

damn funny?


I love when kbarr does these kind of quotes. It reminds me of the time Nahualli owned him by pretending he was Jack Crow.
Back to top
kbarr
RealPoor Jedi
RealPoor Jedi


Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Posts: 11239
Location: New York, now go fuck off...



PostPosted: 01/18/06 - 21:09    Post subject: Reply with quote

motherface wrote:
kbarr wrote:
kireol wrote:
I'm pretty sure sinrakin was expressing some sarcasm. Damn funny sarcasm too.


pretty sure?

damn funny?


I love when kbarr does these kind of quotes. It reminds me of the time Nahualli owned him by pretending he was Jack Crow.


If JC was not the f*g, who was it?

Until you can show who else had access to both their IPs, then you are simply blowing smoke. The IP evidence leads directly to the f*g, over and over.

64.121.199.63
199.108.88.233
24.5.74.171
170.148.92.44
170.148.10.46
170.148.92.18
12.236.250.58
67.164.14.187
66.204.14.3
67.117.73.90
64.139.1.151
67.164.8.114
67.188.111.213
209.179.228.184
63.241.65.15
198.81.26.78
69.232.157.155
67.20.238.22
24.293.168.236



That is unless you have evidence to prove it wasn't the f*g.

Lets see it.
Back to top
That Lumberg Guy
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 3790



PostPosted: 01/18/06 - 21:51    Post subject: Reply with quote

Back to top
kireol
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 02 Aug 2003
Posts: 9517
Location: Royal Oak, MI



PostPosted: 01/18/06 - 22:08    Post subject: Reply with quote

That Lumberg Guy wrote:


soloable
Back to top
That Lumberg Guy
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 3790



PostPosted: 01/18/06 - 22:10    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:


soloable
Back to top
motherface
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 12 Mar 2003
Posts: 3407



PostPosted: 01/18/06 - 22:21    Post subject: Reply with quote

kbarr wrote:
motherface wrote:
kbarr wrote:
kireol wrote:
I'm pretty sure sinrakin was expressing some sarcasm. Damn funny sarcasm too.


pretty sure?

damn funny?


I love when kbarr does these kind of quotes. It reminds me of the time Nahualli owned him by pretending he was Jack Crow.


If JC was not the f*g, who was it?

Until you can show who else had access to both their IPs, then you are simply blowing smoke. The IP evidence leads directly to the f*g, over and over.

64.121.199.63
199.108.88.233
24.5.74.171
170.148.92.44
170.148.10.46
170.148.92.18
12.236.250.58
67.164.14.187
66.204.14.3
67.117.73.90
64.139.1.151
67.164.8.114
67.188.111.213
209.179.228.184
63.241.65.15
198.81.26.78
69.232.157.155
67.20.238.22
24.293.168.236



That is unless you have evidence to prove it wasn't the f*g.

Lets see it.


What's posting a list of IP addresses supposed to prove?
Back to top
ATM Banana
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 02 Jan 2003
Posts: 8575



PostPosted: 01/18/06 - 22:32    Post subject: Reply with quote

that he can post a list of IPs, its obvious isn't it, they all add up to some arbritraty number that is somehow evidence to his claim.


1. IPs are never to be revealed by an administrator unless requested by authorities (non retired authorities)
2. IPs from any other source are about as credible as a 5 year old.
Back to top
Jukas
Toomuchtimeonhands
Toomuchtimeonhands


Joined: 19 Mar 2003
Posts: 896



PostPosted: 01/18/06 - 22:47    Post subject: Reply with quote

ATM Banana wrote:

1. IPs are never to be revealed by an administrator unless requested by authorities (non retired authorities)
2. IPs from any other source are about as credible as a 5 year old.


Only fuckheads say "never".
Back to top
Venkmen
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 12 Oct 2002
Posts: 2260



PostPosted: 01/18/06 - 22:50    Post subject: Reply with quote

Those IP's are all over the place. Hell i think that my IP starts out the same as some of the ones listed and I live half way across teh country from Nahoo.

It proves nothing, except that Kbarr know d**k about how IP's work.
Back to top
motherface
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 12 Mar 2003
Posts: 3407



PostPosted: 01/18/06 - 22:56    Post subject: Reply with quote

I wouldn't believe them unless I was given admin or root and able to see them for myself.

Anyway, here's some proof:

172.16.0.113
192.168.0.114
172.16.0.114
192.168.0.115
172.16.0.115
192.168.0.116
172.16.0.116
192.168.0.117
172.16.0.117
192.168.0.118
172.16.0.118
192.168.0.119
172.16.0.119
192.168.0.120
172.16.0.120
192.168.0.121
172.16.0.121
192.168.0.122
172.16.0.122
192.168.0.123
172.16.0.123
192.168.0.124
172.16.0.124
192.168.0.125
172.16.0.125
192.168.0.126
172.16.0.126
192.168.0.127
172.16.0.127
192.168.0.128
172.16.0.128
192.168.0.129
172.16.0.129
192.168.0.130
172.16.0.130
192.168.0.131
172.16.0.131
192.168.0.132
172.16.0.132
192.168.0.133
172.16.0.133
Back to top
kbarr
RealPoor Jedi
RealPoor Jedi


Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Posts: 11239
Location: New York, now go fuck off...



PostPosted: 01/18/06 - 22:58    Post subject: Reply with quote

motherface wrote:
kbarr wrote:
motherface wrote:
kbarr wrote:
kireol wrote:
I'm pretty sure sinrakin was expressing some sarcasm. Damn funny sarcasm too.


pretty sure?

damn funny?


I love when kbarr does these kind of quotes. It reminds me of the time Nahualli owned him by pretending he was Jack Crow.


If JC was not the f*g, who was it?

Until you can show who else had access to both their IPs, then you are simply blowing smoke. The IP evidence leads directly to the f*g, over and over.

64.121.199.63
199.108.88.233
24.5.74.171
170.148.92.44
170.148.10.46
170.148.92.18
12.236.250.58
67.164.14.187
66.204.14.3
67.117.73.90
64.139.1.151
67.164.8.114
67.188.111.213
209.179.228.184
63.241.65.15
198.81.26.78
69.232.157.155
67.20.238.22
24.293.168.236



That is unless you have evidence to prove it wasn't the f*g.

Lets see it.


What's posting a list of IP addresses supposed to prove?


They are a collection of IPs that matched the JC/f*g posts. I saved them:)
Back to top
motherface
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 12 Mar 2003
Posts: 3407



PostPosted: 01/18/06 - 23:00    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you really wanted to provide the ips as "evidence" you'd need to do something like "On April 4, Nahualli posted from 1.2.3.4. On April 5, JC also posted from 1.2.3.4!' What you did was post a list of shit.
Back to top
That Lumberg Guy
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 3790



PostPosted: 01/19/06 - 00:00    Post subject: Reply with quote

Back to top
kbarr
RealPoor Jedi
RealPoor Jedi


Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Posts: 11239
Location: New York, now go fuck off...



PostPosted: 01/19/06 - 00:15    Post subject: Reply with quote

motherface wrote:
If you really wanted to provide the ips as "evidence" you'd need to do something like "On April 4, Nahualli posted from 1.2.3.4. On April 5, JC also posted from 1.2.3.4!' What you did was post a list of shit.


Thats exactly where I got these IPs. Someone did that and I saved the numbers. I remember the f*g had trouble explaining himself. In fact, he never did explain, other than to deny he was JC.

Besides, you claim to know who JC is.

Who?
Back to top
Oogie
Luke Warm
Luke Warm


Joined: 13 Oct 2002
Posts: 216



PostPosted: 01/19/06 - 00:26    Post subject: Reply with quote

kbarr wrote:
They are a collection of IPs that matched the JC/f*g posts. I saved them:)


Dork.

http://www.imnotchocolate.com
Back to top
kbarr
RealPoor Jedi
RealPoor Jedi


Joined: 05 Oct 2004
Posts: 11239
Location: New York, now go fuck off...



PostPosted: 01/19/06 - 00:33    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oogie wrote:
kbarr wrote:
They are a collection of IPs that matched the JC/f*g posts. I saved them:)


Dork.

http://www.imnotchocolate.com


Incorrect, you little idiot.

If I wrote it down and saved it next to my tax records, then i would have to agree. I would be a dork.

But thats not the case. All I did was save it on my trusty computer. my computer is cool like that. I can make it remember the most mundane and useless information that i would never be able to remember in my head.

Then later, if by chance, I need that information again because another little idiot is making claims he cannot back up with facts, i will have it.

My computer is amazing.

It assists me in being right, again.
Back to top
shinja mayoke
Luke Warm
Luke Warm


Joined: 04 Jan 2003
Posts: 434



PostPosted: 01/19/06 - 07:27    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why isnt this all over the news?

Why is it acceptable for anyone but white people to be a f*****g racist piece of shit?

Why is this f*****g retard still mayor of a city he failed so miserably to evacuate?

How many white b*****s do you think hes f*****g with the 'hey baby im the mayor of new orleans' line?

Who would believe he meant 'O no sir, I wasnt being a dumb n****r, I meant milk chocolate!'
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Goto page 1, 2   Next
Page 1 of 2

Related topics:
chocolate chip cookies
yummy... I'll take one. With chocolate please. (NWS)
Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
Chocolate!
Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
Eating a piece of chocolate