The time now is 07/24/08 - 02:42
Log in: Username: Password:
Search forums for:
  

Another Clark-bashing thread

Post new topic   Reply to topic
Author Message
WheresNWS
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 19 Nov 2002
Posts: 6448



PostPosted: 10/28/03 - 20:05    Post subject: Another Clark-bashing thread Reply with quote

Yup. He just said Bush is responsible for 9/11...

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2003/10/28/national1500EST0687.DTL&type=printable
Back to top
Tinladar
Sir Postalot
Sir Postalot


Joined: 03 Jan 2003
Posts: 1448



PostPosted: 10/28/03 - 20:05    Post subject: Reply with quote

yay!
Back to top
Are you skilled mage or a hardboiled warrior in search for most suitable guild to join?
Or if you're already guild member ready to share some real PvP experience…
» Join the Guild Wars forum now! «
Zuldane
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 4057
Location: At sea.



PostPosted: 10/28/03 - 20:06    Post subject: Reply with quote

huuuuuuuuhlmmk
Back to top
Janoth
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 17 Nov 2002
Posts: 3135



PostPosted: 10/28/03 - 20:07    Post subject: Reply with quote

And he is still the best democratic candidate =)

Clark is basically trying to appeal to all the Bush haters in America and tap into some of Dean's following.
Back to top
WheresNWS
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 19 Nov 2002
Posts: 6448



PostPosted: 10/28/03 - 20:09    Post subject: Reply with quote

I guess this is what Shelton was talking about when he said Clark has "integrity and character issues".
Back to top
Paco
RealPoor Jedi
RealPoor Jedi


Joined: 13 Oct 2002
Posts: 12940
Location: Jacksonville, FL



PostPosted: 10/28/03 - 20:24    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bush is responsible, sir.

It happened on his watch. It's just that simple.

But why I will vote for Bush the next run is simply this: He's making amends for it. They started it, he'll do his best to finish it.
Back to top
Akronn
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8752



PostPosted: 10/28/03 - 20:24    Post subject: Reply with quote

What politician doesn't lol?
Back to top
Akronn
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8752



PostPosted: 10/28/03 - 20:25    Post subject: Reply with quote

Paco wrote:
Bush is responsible, sir.

It happened on his watch. It's just that simple.

But why I will vote for Bush the next run is simply this: He's making amends for it. They started it, he'll do his best to finish it.


He better get cracking then.
Back to top
Paco
RealPoor Jedi
RealPoor Jedi


Joined: 13 Oct 2002
Posts: 12940
Location: Jacksonville, FL



PostPosted: 10/28/03 - 20:28    Post subject: Reply with quote

heh, too bad people are impatient

his legacy will live on long after he's gone, now or in 4 more, or 20..

things will be set in motion, that will make things better for the future

big picture folks, c'mon, picture it with me
Back to top
Janoth
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 17 Nov 2002
Posts: 3135



PostPosted: 10/28/03 - 20:28    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm voting for Bush for lack of a better choice. He is going around trying to kill the f*****s that wanna kill us. As long as we continue to do that I can tolerate the other b******t.

The fact is none of the candidates are good. None are driven by the wish to better the country. None even stand with all the issues they actually agree with. The sad thing is it is impossible for someone who DOES these things to actually become president.
Back to top
WheresNWS
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 19 Nov 2002
Posts: 6448



PostPosted: 10/28/03 - 20:29    Post subject: Reply with quote

Paco wrote:
Bush is responsible, sir.

It happened on his watch. It's just that simple.

But why I will vote for Bush the next run is simply this: He's making amends for it. They started it, he'll do his best to finish it.

lol. I thought the terrorists had something to do with it.
Back to top
Paco
RealPoor Jedi
RealPoor Jedi


Joined: 13 Oct 2002
Posts: 12940
Location: Jacksonville, FL



PostPosted: 10/28/03 - 20:31    Post subject: Reply with quote

WheresNWS wrote:
Paco wrote:
Bush is responsible, sir.

It happened on his watch. It's just that simple.

But why I will vote for Bush the next run is simply this: He's making amends for it. They started it, he'll do his best to finish it.

lol. I thought the terrorists had something to do with it.


you don't understand the word responsiblity, do you?
Back to top
WheresNWS
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 19 Nov 2002
Posts: 6448



PostPosted: 10/28/03 - 20:34    Post subject: Reply with quote

Paco wrote:
WheresNWS wrote:
Paco wrote:
Bush is responsible, sir.

It happened on his watch. It's just that simple.

But why I will vote for Bush the next run is simply this: He's making amends for it. They started it, he'll do his best to finish it.

lol. I thought the terrorists had something to do with it.


you don't understand the word responsiblity, do you?

Lets be smarter and look up the word "Responsible." The applicable definition is...

"Being a source or cause"

And Bush was the source or cause of this...how? I guess he ejected at the last moment.
Back to top
Paco
RealPoor Jedi
RealPoor Jedi


Joined: 13 Oct 2002
Posts: 12940
Location: Jacksonville, FL



PostPosted: 10/28/03 - 20:35    Post subject: Reply with quote

define ownership

apply to responsiblity
Back to top
Clevinger
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 3765
Location: Austin



PostPosted: 10/28/03 - 20:37    Post subject: Reply with quote

its sad that clark is actually a major candidate (if he isnt leading by now?)
Back to top
Paco
RealPoor Jedi
RealPoor Jedi


Joined: 13 Oct 2002
Posts: 12940
Location: Jacksonville, FL



PostPosted: 10/28/03 - 20:37    Post subject: Reply with quote

let's review:

One entry found for responsibility.
Main Entry: re·spon·si·bil·i·ty
Pronunciation: ri-"spän(t)-s&-'bi-l&-tE
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -ties
Date: 1786
1 : the quality or state of being responsible : as a : moral, legal, or mental accountability b : RELIABILITY, TRUSTWORTHINESS
2 : something for which one is responsible : BURDEN
Back to top
WheresNWS
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 19 Nov 2002
Posts: 6448



PostPosted: 10/28/03 - 20:44    Post subject: Reply with quote

Paco wrote:
let's review:

One entry found for responsibility.
Main Entry: re·spon·si·bil·i·ty
Pronunciation: ri-"spän(t)-s&-'bi-l&-tE
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -ties
Date: 1786
1 : the quality or state of being responsible : as a : moral, legal, or mental accountability b : RELIABILITY, TRUSTWORTHINESS
2 : something for which one is responsible : BURDEN

That's why I said it would be smarter to look up "responsible" as responsibility is merely the quality of being a responsible person. I guess asking you to be smart was a long shot.
Back to top
Janoth
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 17 Nov 2002
Posts: 3135



PostPosted: 10/28/03 - 20:47    Post subject: Reply with quote

Can we start over? I mean this thread is pretty much f****d now =P
Back to top
Occulis
RealPoor Jedi
RealPoor Jedi


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 13293
Location: Moral Relativity Central



PostPosted: 10/28/03 - 20:54    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree, but...

You cannot predict acts of terrorism.

How many of you run bacteria / virus scanners on your shampoo bottles? No seals on them. How about soap? Simple paper wrapping those.

Shipyards aren't exactly the most secure places in the world. 17 precision strikes simultaneously = "no import / export for the USA!" 90% (maybe higher now) of our imports and exports occur at 17, yes, 17 places.

I could walk into a huge chemical plant 5 miles from my house and set off a bomb before anyone could stop me.

You cannot be everywhere all the time, and who would want to? Chasing after these things is the ultimate need-in-haystack problem.

If someone wants to f**k you up, they're going to find a way to do it. But you know all this, of course.
Back to top
WheresNWS
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 19 Nov 2002
Posts: 6448



PostPosted: 10/28/03 - 21:01    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not to mention the fact that intelligence did not point out the fact that airplane would be crashed into the world trade center and pentagon. Now if the FBI came to Bush and said, "hey, these terrorists are going to crash airplanes into the world trade center" and he said, "Do nothing!!! HAHAHAHA!!!" then he would be responsible, given the fact that he would have foreknowledge and the means to stop it. Bush inhereted an intelligence department in ruin and never got any information. To suggest that he was responsible is a ridiculous politically partisan attack on the US. Why don't we attack whoever's fault it was that the intelligence department was so deteriorated. Let's see...who would that be?
Back to top
Tolanin
RealPoor Guru
RealPoor Guru


Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 3551



PostPosted: 10/28/03 - 21:03    Post subject: Reply with quote

and bush realizes that.. the best defense is a good offense.
Back to top
Occulis
RealPoor Jedi
RealPoor Jedi


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 13293
Location: Moral Relativity Central



PostPosted: 10/28/03 - 21:12    Post subject: Reply with quote

Absolute best defense is to eliminate the threat by...


...


... peacefully allying with everyone on the planet. If you have no enemies, what can threaten you? An asteroid?
Back to top
ATM Banana
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 02 Jan 2003
Posts: 8575



PostPosted: 10/28/03 - 21:20    Post subject: Reply with quote

basically, if the world would stop bsing aronud we might get some shit done, i mean our existance on earth is running out quickly, if something doesnt get done we're screwed, we need to like find a new world to take over and f*****g pwn everyone/thing on it, so we won't get screwed if out planet it his by a fatty asteroid
Back to top
Paco
RealPoor Jedi
RealPoor Jedi


Joined: 13 Oct 2002
Posts: 12940
Location: Jacksonville, FL



PostPosted: 10/28/03 - 22:33    Post subject: Reply with quote

WheresNWS wrote:
Paco wrote:
let's review:

One entry found for responsibility.
Main Entry: re·spon·si·bil·i·ty
Pronunciation: ri-"spän(t)-s&-'bi-l&-tE
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -ties
Date: 1786
1 : the quality or state of being responsible : as a : moral, legal, or mental accountability b : RELIABILITY, TRUSTWORTHINESS
2 : something for which one is responsible : BURDEN

That's why I said it would be smarter to look up "responsible" as responsibility is merely the quality of being a responsible person. I guess asking you to be smart was a long shot.


who the f**k is putting words in who's mouth now? lol

I do believe *I* used the word "responsiblity" memememememe

don't change the f*****g subject, b***h, your ass got sacked

pork

chop

sandwich
Back to top
Silvermouse
RealPoor Jedi
RealPoor Jedi


Joined: 12 Oct 2002
Posts: 11015



PostPosted: 10/28/03 - 22:39    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.nineelevenbountyhunter.com/

I know this guy.
Back to top
WheresNWS
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 19 Nov 2002
Posts: 6448



PostPosted: 10/28/03 - 22:42    Post subject: Reply with quote

Paco wrote:


who the f**k is putting words in who's mouth now? lol

I do believe *I* used the word "responsiblity" memememememe

don't change the f*****g subject, b***h, your ass got sacked

pork

chop

sandwich



Paco wrote:

Bush is responsible, sir.

It happened on his watch. It's just that simple.

But why I will vote for Bush the next run is simply this: He's making amends for it. They started it, he'll do his best to finish it.


Oops!
Back to top
Paco
RealPoor Jedi
RealPoor Jedi


Joined: 13 Oct 2002
Posts: 12940
Location: Jacksonville, FL



PostPosted: 10/28/03 - 23:07    Post subject: Reply with quote

hey, you took it out of context

i corrected you

thanks for pointing that out spock
Back to top
WheresNWS
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 19 Nov 2002
Posts: 6448



PostPosted: 10/28/03 - 23:11    Post subject: Reply with quote

Paco wrote:
hey, you took it out of context

i corrected you

thanks for pointing that out spock

Uh...no. I'll break it down for you, since you're dim.

1. You say Bush was responsible.
2. I say, he clearly was not, being that the terrorists are the ones who perpetrated the attacks.
3. You told me to look up the definition of "responsibility"
4. Since you used "responsible", I looked that up for you.
5. Responsibility is defined as "Being a source or cause"
6. You go off on some weird tangent about "responsiblity" (which even by your definition does not apply since it means that Bush could be relied on IF he had intelligence information, which he did not).
7. You try to dig yourself out of an obvious hole.

Go hit the bong again. You may as well kill those last 3 brain cells.
Back to top
Paco
RealPoor Jedi
RealPoor Jedi


Joined: 13 Oct 2002
Posts: 12940
Location: Jacksonville, FL



PostPosted: 10/28/03 - 23:14    Post subject: Reply with quote

Got them. the last 3.

you still got burned spock

otherwise i'd be like, "gee, thanks for pointing that out, you're absolutly right!"

but I didn't, sir

I corrected your vision, but the brain isn't recieving the signal

go to bed with your 2.3 children to be, and 3.5 bathroom house, and don't you worry about what all the mean people say about you, it'll all be behind you in moments
Back to top
Akronn
RealPoor Master of Posts
RealPoor Master of Posts


Joined: 11 Oct 2002
Posts: 8752



PostPosted: 10/28/03 - 23:14    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why does it always come down to trying to pick apart the other person's words lol? That's what these discussions have become, everytime!

It doesn't matter who said what in which freakin tense or if they used the adverb, adjective, etc. It's the damn point that matters. Sheesh!

Here, I found a gift for ya:

http://www.thbookservice.com/BookPage.asp?prod_cd=c6230
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4   Next
Page 1 of 4

Related topics:
Yet another workout question
this is another test
How long untill another ele guild comes along?
Atarom did you really need ANOTHER account?
70 Horde Rogue, Trading for another Horde 70
Another piece of jackass legislation...
Another Computer Question
Found another picture of Eduin!!!
Can anyone edit a pic for a avatar for another board for me?
WTT lvl 90 SWG and lvl 45 Archlord for another SWG
another wow
Looking to trade 70 be lock for another 70 (varies)
D&D Online is just another Hack and Slash game
I WANT TO TRADE MY STAR WARS GALAXIES ACCOUNT FOR ANOTHER
Another Bush Camp member admits to Swiftboat connections..
I need another funny avatar/sig pic. (nws thx maldek)
trading lvl 71 rs acct membs for another acct
another reason lawyers need to die.
Another problem, not at the AMC! Vekril, you might know
Another diablo 2 thread

 





Warning: fopen(/home/sites/realpoor.com/htdocs/test_cache/Another_Clark_bashing_thread_t16076.html) [function.fopen]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/sites/realpoor.com/htdocs/includes/page_tail.php on line 171

Warning: fwrite(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /home/sites/realpoor.com/htdocs/includes/page_tail.php on line 172

Warning: fclose(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /home/sites/realpoor.com/htdocs/includes/page_tail.php on line 173