Ancient Atomic Warfare proof?

http://www.nexusmagazine.com/ancatomicwar1.html

Spooky if it turns out to be kinda true.

/shrug

Yeah. Sorry. My fault. I tripped and accidentally hit the "launch" and "time travel" buttons at the same time. It won't happen again.

i opened that up and briefly scanned it, and then thought "well this is some pretty ignorant shit, i bet docter responded to this thread.. he's big on crazy conspiracy theory and small on brains"

and then i hit back in the browser, and saw that it was you that POSTED it. i should have known.

Interesting read.

Wouldn't asteroids produce the same type of effects?

They talk about that. It says there is no crater to link a astiroid with the phenomina.

Faerdal wrote:

.. he's big on crazy conspiracy theory and small on brains"

Kindly f**k the hell off, k thanks. At least I have an open mind and am curious about mysteries.

Coolness.

Docters post are the few I read that actualy have something interesting to say. If intresting isnt your thing then why click on something thats title has to do with atomic warfare in ancient times?

Thanks Hobbet, for guarding my "6".

Please, this article quotes people who are big into atlantis and ufo's. The quotes from real science news sources give reasons why the glass might be distributed the way it is and yes, an aerial blast like the tunguska event (which didn't produced a crater) could generate the material.

And Greek fire is made by eating grape leaves stuffed with jalapeno peppers.

Well, that or by Turks interrogating greek cypriots

Docter wrote:

Thanks Hobbet, for guarding my "6".

i have nothing against you doc, but you're definetly in troube when HOBBET's guarding your 6

Arinwulf wrote:

Please, this article quotes people who are big into atlantis and ufo's. The quotes from real science news sources give reasons why the glass might be distributed the way it is and yes, an aerial blast like the tunguska event (which didn't produced a crater) could generate the material. And Greek fire is made by eating grape leaves stuffed with jalapeno peppers. Well, that or by Turks interrogating greek cypriots

While i a gree the article is far fetched at best they do quote articles from scientific american and they are reputable in my book...

meteors dont have to leave crators.. there was one that hit russia in like 1913 that exploded a mile or so above the earth.. no crator.. really high radiation damage to surounding shit.

Its hard to investigate shit like this because it never got alot of suport.. the idea that the human race was great at one point in the past but was nearly destroyed and then came back is possible.. there is even evidence for it in genetics actually because at one point prolly 20k years ago a large portion of our race was wiped out and its the reason we are not very genetically diverse today.. there are lots of old unexplained things around caves carved with lasers to old for lasers to have existed.. lots of stuff.

But it conflicts with the bible that says the earth is 5k years old lol so they dont investigate much.

How the f**k can a meteor just "explode" above the earth? For something to explode, doesn't it require some sort of explosive? Was the m**********r drenched in gasoline? lol

Some cool things in the article. About Maiden's Castle:
"It covers an area of 120 acres, with an average width of 1,500 feet and length of 3,000 feet. The inner circumference is about 11Ú2 miles round, and it has been estimated...that it would require 250,000 men to defend it! It is hard, therefore, to believe that this construction was intended to be a defensive position.

A great puzzle to archaeologists has always been the multiple and labyrinthine east and west entrances at each end of the enclosure. Originally they may have been built as a way for processional entry by people of the Neolithic era. Later, when warriors of the Iron Age were using the site as a fortress, they probably found them useful as a means of confusing the attacking force trying to gain entry. The fact that so many of these "hill-forts" have two entrances--one north of east and the other south of west--also suggests some form of Sun ceremonial.

With 250,000 men defending a fort, we are talking about a huge army in a very organised society. This is not a bunch of fur-wearing Picts with spears defending a fort from marauding bands of hunter-gatherers. The questions remain, though. What huge army might have occupied these cliffside forts by the sea or lake entrances? And what massive maritime power were these people unsuccessfully defending themselves against?


That sounds cool. I'd like to see that one day.

The following would explain a lot about scotland, all their intelligent ancestors killed off by atomic bombs from Atlantis.


The forts on the western coast of Scotland are reminiscent of the mysterious clifftop forts in the Aran Islands on the west coast of Ireland. Here we truly have shades of the Atlantis story, with a powerful naval fleet attacking and conquering its neighbours in a terrible war. It has been theorised that the terrible battles of the Atlantis story took place in Wales, Scotland, Ireland and England--however, in the case of the Scottish vitrified forts it looks as if these were the losers of a war, not the victors. And defeat can be seen across the land: the war dykes in Sussex, the vitrified forts of Scotland, the utter collapse and disappearance of the civilisation that built these things. What long-ago Armageddon destroyed ancient Scotland?

A few points. First, that long ago, there would be no "england", or "Ireland". England and Ireland would be the western coast of what we know as Europe. This could explain why Atlantis was supposidly covered in water, since much of the area probably was when England split off from the mainland of Europe.

Also, if they truly posessed the technology of Atomic weapons, above ground forts would have long since been proven obsolete(as they are now). Not only that, but the idea of 250,000 men defending one area, in a fort such as that would also be obsolete. So I find the idea that some advanced civilization that posessed nuclear capabilities building an above ground defensive fortress that 250,000 men manned pretty unlikely. This could be why they lost the war, though =) Damn scotish f*****s never learn

Quote:

Religious texts and geological evidence suggest that several parts of the world have experienced destructive atomic blasts in ages past.

thats all i read


sorry, you could pull any shit you want out of religious text


hell, i bet theres evidence aliens visited earth and elvis presley went back in time

i would like to say that I also like reading docs posts, even though i dont beleive in aliens, or werewolfs, or sumperman, I find that the insight i get from reading his posts helps me somehow. I'm not sure how, but at least it beats reading shit from vekril.

Tolanin wrote:

meteors dont have to leave crators.. there was one that hit russia in like 1913 that exploded a mile or so above the earth.. no crator.. really high radiation damage to surounding shit. Its hard to investigate shit like this because it never got alot of suport.. the idea that the human race was great at one point in the past but was nearly destroyed and then came back is possible.. there is even evidence for it in genetics actually because at one point prolly 20k years ago a large portion of our race was wiped out and its the reason we are not very genetically diverse today.. there are lots of old unexplained things around caves carved with lasers to old for lasers to have existed.. lots of stuff. But it conflicts with the bible that says the earth is 5k years old lol so they dont investigate much.

First off the Bible never claims the earth is 5K years old, and secondly claiming science does not investigate something because is supposedly somehow conflicts with the Bible is a completely rediculous statement altogether.

And finally, the fact that most of the human race was recently wiped out actually coincides very nicely with the Genesis flood account (ie that most of the human race was wiped out recently =p). Other genetic studies indicate that we have a more recent male common ancestor (based on Y Chromosone only passed from the male) than female common ancestor (based on mitichondrial DNA - passed from the mother). This doesn't seem to make sense on the surface, but once again coincides with the Bible teaches - the people on the Ark were Noah,his wife, his 3 son and their 3 wives. The 4 wives would have carried the older more diverse mitochondrial DNA while Noah and 3 sons would have identical Y chromosone DNA...(So the most recent common female ancestor according the Bible would be Eve, older than Noah, and the most recent common male ancestor would be Noah...)

Ok, sorry to go off topic, but occaionally I pop on here, read something that is just entirely off base and feel the need to correct it. I'm just anal that way.

The final issue about atomic weapons. They leave radioactive isotopes like Cesium 137 which has a half life of (as I recall) about 30,000 years. Even though the level of radiation might be close to background, someone could do determine if cesium 137 and strontium 90 are in the soil.