|
|
| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
Posted: 10/24/04 - 14:25 Post subject: 44 Iraqi soldiers smoked execution style
|
|
|
Yay! everything is going so smooth in Iraq!
Woot free the Iraq citizens !!!!
| Quote: | | BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- Iraqi authorities have discovered the bodies of 44 Iraqi soldiers and four drivers after they were ambushed and killed overnight near the Iraq-Iran border, an Iraqi military commander said Sunday |
Iraq is f****d.
Situation grim f*****s this is a classic reason why you dont attack someone unless they attacked you first.
| Quote: | | Discovery of the bodies was followed by news that insurgents had killed a U.S. State Department security official at a U.S. Army base near Baghdad airport. |
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Docter
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 21 Oct 2002 Posts: 3420
|
Posted: 10/24/04 - 14:39 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
And these insurgents are coming from where???
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: 10/24/04 - 14:57 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Docter wrote: | | And these insurgents are coming from where??? |
f**k you doc
Why dont you instead tell me what the f**k bush was thinking pre emptively attacking a country that had nothing to do with Alqueda on the eve of 911.
Or not I dont give a f**k.
Point of the story Bush doesnt have the Wisdom to run the US.
Case and point is IRAQ
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Scrabler
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 11 Oct 2002 Posts: 2660
Location: Mobile, AL
|
Posted: 10/24/04 - 15:00 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Jack Crow wrote: | | Docter wrote: | | And these insurgents are coming from where??? |
f**k you doc
Why dont you instead tell me what the f**k bush was thinking pre emptively attacking a country that had nothing to do with Alqueda on the eve of 911.
Or not I dont give a f**k.
Point of the story Bush doesnt have the Wisdom to run the US.
Case and point is IRAQ |
It's the war on TERROR j*****s, not just Al Qaeda. Saddam was a threat so why is it such a hard thing for you to see he was next on the list?
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: 10/24/04 - 15:07 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Scrabler wrote: | | Jack Crow wrote: | | Docter wrote: | | And these insurgents are coming from where??? |
f**k you doc
Why dont you instead tell me what the f**k bush was thinking pre emptively attacking a country that had nothing to do with Alqueda on the eve of 911.
Or not I dont give a f**k.
Point of the story Bush doesnt have the Wisdom to run the US.
Case and point is IRAQ |
It's the war on TERROR j*****s, not just Al Qaeda. Saddam was a threat so why is it such a hard thing for you to see he was next on the list? |
usually the war on terror involves some terrorists.
And Binladen was the threat, and thus should have been the priority target.
tying up all our resources in a country that was weakening and contained while the faction who attacks us is allowed to run free and thrive is moronic at best.
Not to mention that while he lay low in relative safety in some hole somewhere, all the things he said America would do came true in the eyes of moselm extremists.
It was probably a better recruitment program for terrorists than that "marine who climbs the mountain and fights the monster with his magical sword" was for our military.
Last edited by Guest on 10/24/04 - 15:12; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Silvermouse
RealPoor Jedi

Joined: 12 Oct 2002 Posts: 11015
|
Posted: 10/24/04 - 15:10 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Scrabler wrote: | | Jack Crow wrote: | | Docter wrote: | | And these insurgents are coming from where??? |
f**k you doc
Why dont you instead tell me what the f**k bush was thinking pre emptively attacking a country that had nothing to do with Alqueda on the eve of 911.
Or not I dont give a f**k.
Point of the story Bush doesnt have the Wisdom to run the US.
Case and point is IRAQ |
It's the war on TERROR j*****s, not just Al Qaeda. Saddam was a threat so why is it such a hard thing for you to see he was next on the list? |
So what's next, Scrabler? Do we wage a costly joint war with South Korea vs. The Terror of North Korea?
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Manuva
Banned

Joined: 12 Oct 2002 Posts: 2536
|
Posted: 10/24/04 - 15:12 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
Scrabler has been assimilated
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: 10/24/04 - 15:13 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Silvermouse wrote: | | Scrabler wrote: | | Jack Crow wrote: | | Docter wrote: | | And these insurgents are coming from where??? |
f**k you doc
Why dont you instead tell me what the f**k bush was thinking pre emptively attacking a country that had nothing to do with Alqueda on the eve of 911.
Or not I dont give a f**k.
Point of the story Bush doesnt have the Wisdom to run the US.
Case and point is IRAQ |
It's the war on TERROR j*****s, not just Al Qaeda. Saddam was a threat so why is it such a hard thing for you to see he was next on the list? |
So what's next, Scrabler? Do we wage a costly joint war with South Korea vs. The Terror of North Korea? |
mass genocide is a terrifying thought too.
We gonna go to Africa?
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
quotison
RealPoor Sensei

Joined: 13 Oct 2002 Posts: 1594
|
Posted: 10/24/04 - 15:14 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Silvermouse wrote: | | Scrabler wrote: | | Jack Crow wrote: | | Docter wrote: | | And these insurgents are coming from where??? |
f**k you doc
Why dont you instead tell me what the f**k bush was thinking pre emptively attacking a country that had nothing to do with Alqueda on the eve of 911.
Or not I dont give a f**k.
Point of the story Bush doesnt have the Wisdom to run the US.
Case and point is IRAQ |
It's the war on TERROR j*****s, not just Al Qaeda. Saddam was a threat so why is it such a hard thing for you to see he was next on the list? |
So what's next, Scrabler? Do we wage a costly joint war with South Korea vs. The Terror of North Korea? |
I believe Scrabler noted that he wanted to be fighting in a war in Iran by the time he got into the Marines. Perhaps we could find some time for North Korea somewhere between Iran and Libya?
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Scrabler
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 11 Oct 2002 Posts: 2660
Location: Mobile, AL
|
Posted: 10/24/04 - 15:16 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Silvermouse wrote: | | Scrabler wrote: | | Jack Crow wrote: | | Docter wrote: | | And these insurgents are coming from where??? |
f**k you doc
Why dont you instead tell me what the f**k bush was thinking pre emptively attacking a country that had nothing to do with Alqueda on the eve of 911.
Or not I dont give a f**k.
Point of the story Bush doesnt have the Wisdom to run the US.
Case and point is IRAQ |
It's the war on TERROR j*****s, not just Al Qaeda. Saddam was a threat so why is it such a hard thing for you to see he was next on the list? |
So what's next, Scrabler? Do we wage a costly joint war with South Korea vs. The Terror of North Korea? |
Well Iran and North Korea are the only threats left really besides China. Iran isn't that big of a problem if we want to get rid of them but NK is past the point of being somewhat easy to deal with.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Manuva
Banned

Joined: 12 Oct 2002 Posts: 2536
|
Posted: 10/24/04 - 15:26 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
We're barely handling Iraq, Iran would knock the shit out of us at this point.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Scrabler
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 11 Oct 2002 Posts: 2660
Location: Mobile, AL
|
Posted: 10/24/04 - 15:28 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Manuva wrote: | | We're barely handling Iraq, Iran would knock the shit out of us at this point. |
Iraq sucks because our guys can't do what they're suppose to.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Rycrias
Luke Warm

Joined: 21 Oct 2002 Posts: 269
Location: Indianapolis, IN
|
Posted: 10/24/04 - 15:29 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
WTF are you talking about? Some of us have ALREADY been to East Africa and Bosnia. Did you get your panties in a bunch when American soldiers were losing thier lives back then? Or perhaps it was ok because slick Willy was in office?
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
merdocc
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 11 Oct 2002 Posts: 2038
Location: Pasadena Ca
|
Posted: 10/24/04 - 15:39 Post subject:
|
|
|
I love the argument that we are getting beat in iraq. We invaded and toppled their government in record time. The reason why it appears we are being bogged down is that we don't fight like everyone else. We are acting as the state police right now not fighting a war anymore. Look at israel and palestine and that's pretty much what's going on in iraq right now. If we wanted too we could completely blow away north korea, iran, iraq and afganistan right now. What we are trying to do is rebuild every country we take over so the region will no longer be a hotbed of terrorists. In the long run it will be what is best for our security and the security of the world.
Does anyone know where they post the body count of iraqi civilians and "terrorists" ? I know they try and cover it up a bit.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Luturb
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 11 Oct 2002 Posts: 4043
Location: Livermore, California
|
Posted: 10/24/04 - 16:34 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Jack Crow wrote: | | attacking a country that had nothing to do with Alqueda on the eve of 911. |
You argue politics all day every day and you still haven't figured out how to spell Al Qaeda.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Docter
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 21 Oct 2002 Posts: 3420
|
Posted: 10/24/04 - 16:55 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Jack Crow wrote: | | Docter wrote: | | And these insurgents are coming from where??? |
f**k you doc
Why dont you instead tell me what the f**k bush was thinking pre emptively attacking a country that had nothing to do with Alqueda on the eve of 911.
Or not I dont give a f**k.
Point of the story Bush doesnt have the Wisdom to run the US.
Case and point is IRAQ |
Did I hit a logic nerve? LOL
I've been to Dachau...I've seen the pictures...I understand what GENOCIDE is all about...the total elimination of a race/creed/color/religion of one type. Yes, freeing the people of Iraq was a noble and morally righteous event...freedom is worth fighting for...and the majority of Iraqi's are helping to fight for this freedom. Yes, a few bad insurgents are rooted in strongholds and lashing out...but really, how long do you think they will be able to survive in an ongoing hostile environment. The more Iraqi's the insurgents kill, the more those harboring them, will turn against the insurgents. You did perhaps read the other week that the 70+ insurgents that were captured in one raid, were all Iranian. Draw your own conclusions.
As far as should we intervene in the Sudan...yes, but we are leaving the stage open for the UN to get involved...but they don't seem to be the interested in helping humanity, only making money for themselves and their rogue comrades.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: 10/24/04 - 17:23 Post subject:
|
|
|
| merdocc wrote: | I love the argument that we are getting beat in iraq. We invaded and toppled their government in record time. The reason why it appears we are being bogged down is that we don't fight like everyone else. We are acting as the state police right now not fighting a war anymore. Look at israel and palestine and that's pretty much what's going on in iraq right now. If we wanted too we could completely blow away north korea, iran, iraq and afganistan right now. What we are trying to do is rebuild every country we take over so the region will no longer be a hotbed of terrorists. In the long run it will be what is best for our security and the security of the world.
Does anyone know where they post the body count of iraqi civilians and "terrorists" ? I know they try and cover it up a bit. |
I never said America was some giemp country that would lose a war to Iraq.
We owned them in record time.
Where we are losing is keeping the peace.
Georges Dad knew that ...thats why he didnt go into Iraq in the Gulf war.
He kicked saddams ass and let him go back...then we beat him with containment and sanctions.
Dubya wasnt that smart and now our own soldiers are paying the price.
And now it has gone to shit.
If you say otherwise you are deluded
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Maelstrom
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 11 Oct 2002 Posts: 4072
Location: Montréal
|
Posted: 10/24/04 - 17:25 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Silvermouse wrote: | | Scrabler wrote: | | Jack Crow wrote: | | Docter wrote: | | And these insurgents are coming from where??? |
f**k you doc
Why dont you instead tell me what the f**k bush was thinking pre emptively attacking a country that had nothing to do with Alqueda on the eve of 911.
Or not I dont give a f**k.
Point of the story Bush doesnt have the Wisdom to run the US.
Case and point is IRAQ |
It's the war on TERROR j*****s, not just Al Qaeda. Saddam was a threat so why is it such a hard thing for you to see he was next on the list? |
So what's next, Scrabler? Do we wage a costly joint war with South Korea vs. The Terror of North Korea? |
North Korea has the largest earth army of the world, if I remember well it's about 30,000,000 soldiers in duty.
Not a big surprise that they are also the country in the world that require the biggest food/cereal help.
The US wont be able to deal with that much soldiers forget about it not alone.
Just think about it, the US sent 200,000 soldiers in Iraq and they barely can keep it safe. Now imagine against 30,000,000 soldiers.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: 10/24/04 - 17:25 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Luturb wrote: | | Jack Crow wrote: | | attacking a country that had nothing to do with Alqueda on the eve of 911. |
You argue politics all day every day and you still haven't figured out how to spell Al Qaeda. |
Good thing im not getting paid for it douchebag, I might have to worry about some spellchecking fagtard
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
quotison
RealPoor Sensei

Joined: 13 Oct 2002 Posts: 1594
|
Posted: 10/24/04 - 17:28 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Maelstrom wrote: | | Silvermouse wrote: | | Scrabler wrote: | | Jack Crow wrote: | | Docter wrote: | | And these insurgents are coming from where??? |
f**k you doc
Why dont you instead tell me what the f**k bush was thinking pre emptively attacking a country that had nothing to do with Alqueda on the eve of 911.
Or not I dont give a f**k.
Point of the story Bush doesnt have the Wisdom to run the US.
Case and point is IRAQ |
It's the war on TERROR j*****s, not just Al Qaeda. Saddam was a threat so why is it such a hard thing for you to see he was next on the list? |
So what's next, Scrabler? Do we wage a costly joint war with South Korea vs. The Terror of North Korea? |
North Korea has the largest earth army of the world, if I remember well it's about 30,000,000 soldiers in duty.
Not a big surprise that they are also the country in the world that require the biggest food/cereal help.
The US wont be able to deal with that much soldiers forget about it not alone.
Just think about it, the US sent 200,000 soldiers in Iraq and they barely can keep it safe. Now imagine against 30,000,000 soldiers. |
The entire population of North Korea is 22 million.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Maelstrom
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 11 Oct 2002 Posts: 4072
Location: Montréal
|
Posted: 10/24/04 - 17:38 Post subject:
|
|
|
| quotison wrote: | | Maelstrom wrote: | | Silvermouse wrote: | | Scrabler wrote: | | Jack Crow wrote: | | Docter wrote: | | And these insurgents are coming from where??? |
f**k you doc
Why dont you instead tell me what the f**k bush was thinking pre emptively attacking a country that had nothing to do with Alqueda on the eve of 911.
Or not I dont give a f**k.
Point of the story Bush doesnt have the Wisdom to run the US.
Case and point is IRAQ |
It's the war on TERROR j*****s, not just Al Qaeda. Saddam was a threat so why is it such a hard thing for you to see he was next on the list? |
So what's next, Scrabler? Do we wage a costly joint war with South Korea vs. The Terror of North Korea? |
North Korea has the largest earth army of the world, if I remember well it's about 30,000,000 soldiers in duty.
Not a big surprise that they are also the country in the world that require the biggest food/cereal help.
The US wont be able to deal with that much soldiers forget about it not alone.
Just think about it, the US sent 200,000 soldiers in Iraq and they barely can keep it safe. Now imagine against 30,000,000 soldiers. |
The entire population of North Korea is 22 million. |
Yes maybe but I am 100% sure that every men between 14-50 or so is in the army at least 10,000,000 then.
I don't remember the exact number but even china doesnt have that much soldiers.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
goatface
Sir Postalot

Joined: 12 Oct 2002 Posts: 1354
|
Posted: 10/24/04 - 17:44 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Quote: | North Korea has organized a grand total of seven million men and women into reserve units. Reserve Military Training Unit, Worker-Peasant Militia, and the Young Red Guards make up most of the number. The units are managed by the Party Civil Defense Department in peacetime, but are placed under the Ministry of Defense in contingencies. War mobilization measures usually assign Reserve Military Training Unit to the front or regional defense in war, while the other two units are assigned to maintain security in the rear, guard duty for important facilities, etc. About 30% of all North Koreans between the ages fifteen to sixty are mobilized for reserve units:
* The Reserve Military Training Unit consist of approximately 1.7 million persons (men 17-45 and unmarried women 17-30) who are not either in active duty or important rear area personnel. They are mobilized under supervision of provincial military units, for a total of forty days' training out of the year.
* The Worker-Peasant Militia is a combination of older men aged 45-60, along with men ages 17-45 and unmarried women ages 17-30 who are not included in Reserve Military Training Unit. They train for a total of thirty days out of the year. Their current numbers stand at 4.1 million.
* The Young Red Guards consist of 1.2 million male and female Higher Middle (High) School students aged 14-16. They are subject to a mandatory four-hour drill session every Saturday and a total of 160 hours of on-campus drills annually. A total of 450 hours of off-campus training is also mandatory. |
something i did not know........
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Luturb
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 11 Oct 2002 Posts: 4043
Location: Livermore, California
|
Posted: 10/24/04 - 18:27 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Jack Crow wrote: | | Luturb wrote: | | Jack Crow wrote: | | attacking a country that had nothing to do with Alqueda on the eve of 911. |
You argue politics all day every day and you still haven't figured out how to spell Al Qaeda. |
Good thing im not getting paid for it douchebag, I might have to worry about some spellchecking fagtard |
Believe me, no one would pay for your b******t, even if it was spelled correctly.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: 10/24/04 - 18:43 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Luturb wrote: | | Jack Crow wrote: | | Luturb wrote: | | Jack Crow wrote: | | attacking a country that had nothing to do with Alqueda on the eve of 911. |
You argue politics all day every day and you still haven't figured out how to spell Al Qaeda. |
Good thing im not getting paid for it douchebag, I might have to worry about some spellchecking fagtard |
Believe me, no one would pay for your b******t, even if it was spelled correctly. |
Even if it "were" spelled correctly, you dumb f**k.
And I never claimed to be a pundit on Crossfire, asstard, I'm just a regular guy with an above average interest in politics.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Buckshot
Luke Warm

Joined: 14 Sep 2004 Posts: 449
|
Posted: 10/24/04 - 18:48 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Docter wrote: | | And these insurgents are coming from where??? |
not insurgents assclown, indigent locals.
the US troups are the insurgents there.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Scrabler
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 11 Oct 2002 Posts: 2660
Location: Mobile, AL
|
Posted: 10/24/04 - 20:03 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Maelstrom wrote: | | Silvermouse wrote: | | Scrabler wrote: | | Jack Crow wrote: | | Docter wrote: | | And these insurgents are coming from where??? |
f**k you doc
Why dont you instead tell me what the f**k bush was thinking pre emptively attacking a country that had nothing to do with Alqueda on the eve of 911.
Or not I dont give a f**k.
Point of the story Bush doesnt have the Wisdom to run the US.
Case and point is IRAQ |
It's the war on TERROR j*****s, not just Al Qaeda. Saddam was a threat so why is it such a hard thing for you to see he was next on the list? |
So what's next, Scrabler? Do we wage a costly joint war with South Korea vs. The Terror of North Korea? |
North Korea has the largest earth army of the world, if I remember well it's about 30,000,000 soldiers in duty.
Not a big surprise that they are also the country in the world that require the biggest food/cereal help.
The US wont be able to deal with that much soldiers forget about it not alone.
Just think about it, the US sent 200,000 soldiers in Iraq and they barely can keep it safe. Now imagine against 30,000,000 soldiers. |
Lol d*****s.
We can take multiple countries at the same time and do pretty good. Spending far more on military power then any other country has perks. Massive conventional armies don't stand a chance against us..we have the air superiority and tech to decimate them. Guerilla wars on the other hand keep us from using most of our destructive power due to their small numbers being spread out and fighting around civilians. If there were a million men coming for us accross open territory/forest and no civis around we could just shell and bomb them to a few hundred maybe. It's much harder when 10 guys are running behind houses and shooting at you around corners and through windows - we have to go get them.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Frax
RealPoor Master of Posts

Joined: 11 Oct 2002 Posts: 8489
Location: Fuck yoiu fucking fuckers
|
Posted: 10/24/04 - 20:36 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Buckshot wrote: | | Docter wrote: | | And these insurgents are coming from where??? |
not insurgents assclown, indigent locals.
the US troups are the insurgents there. |
f*****g retard
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Manuva
Banned

Joined: 12 Oct 2002 Posts: 2536
|
Posted: 10/24/04 - 21:28 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Scrabler wrote: | | Maelstrom wrote: | | Silvermouse wrote: | | Scrabler wrote: | | Jack Crow wrote: | | Docter wrote: | | And these insurgents are coming from where??? |
f**k you doc
Why dont you instead tell me what the f**k bush was thinking pre emptively attacking a country that had nothing to do with Alqueda on the eve of 911.
Or not I dont give a f**k.
Point of the story Bush doesnt have the Wisdom to run the US.
Case and point is IRAQ |
It's the war on TERROR j*****s, not just Al Qaeda. Saddam was a threat so why is it such a hard thing for you to see he was next on the list? |
So what's next, Scrabler? Do we wage a costly joint war with South Korea vs. The Terror of North Korea? |
North Korea has the largest earth army of the world, if I remember well it's about 30,000,000 soldiers in duty.
Not a big surprise that they are also the country in the world that require the biggest food/cereal help.
The US wont be able to deal with that much soldiers forget about it not alone.
Just think about it, the US sent 200,000 soldiers in Iraq and they barely can keep it safe. Now imagine against 30,000,000 soldiers. |
Lol d*****s.
We can take multiple countries at the same time and do pretty good. Spending far more on military power then any other country has perks. Massive conventional armies don't stand a chance against us..we have the air superiority and tech to decimate them. Guerilla wars on the other hand keep us from using most of our destructive power due to their small numbers being spread out and fighting around civilians. If there were a million men coming for us accross open territory/forest and no civis around we could just shell and bomb them to a few hundred maybe. It's much harder when 10 guys are running behind houses and shooting at you around corners and through windows - we have to go get them. |
And you think we're going to be fighting in the open desert and nice grassy fields against Iran or North Korea?
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Scrabler
RealPoor Guru

Joined: 11 Oct 2002 Posts: 2660
Location: Mobile, AL
|
Posted: 10/24/04 - 21:31 Post subject:
|
|
|
| Manuva wrote: | | Scrabler wrote: | | Maelstrom wrote: | | Silvermouse wrote: | | Scrabler wrote: | | Jack Crow wrote: | | Docter wrote: | | And these insurgents are coming from where??? |
f**k you doc
Why dont you instead tell me what the f**k bush was thinking pre emptively attacking a country that had nothing to do with Alqueda on the eve of 911.
Or not I dont give a f**k.
Point of the story Bush doesnt have the Wisdom to run the US.
Case and point is IRAQ |
It's the war on TERROR j*****s, not just Al Qaeda. Saddam was a threat so why is it such a hard thing for you to see he was next on the list? |
So what's next, Scrabler? Do we wage a costly joint war with South Korea vs. The Terror of North Korea? |
North Korea has the largest earth army of the world, if I remember well it's about 30,000,000 soldiers in duty.
Not a big surprise that they are also the country in the world that require the biggest food/cereal help.
The US wont be able to deal with that much soldiers forget about it not alone.
Just think about it, the US sent 200,000 soldiers in Iraq and they barely can keep it safe. Now imagine against 30,000,000 soldiers. |
Lol d*****s.
We can take multiple countries at the same time and do pretty good. Spending far more on military power then any other country has perks. Massive conventional armies don't stand a chance against us..we have the air superiority and tech to decimate them. Guerilla wars on the other hand keep us from using most of our destructive power due to their small numbers being spread out and fighting around civilians. If there were a million men coming for us accross open territory/forest and no civis around we could just shell and bomb them to a few hundred maybe. It's much harder when 10 guys are running behind houses and shooting at you around corners and through windows - we have to go get them. |
And you think we're going to be fighting in the open desert and nice grassy fields against Iran or North Korea? |
No Mael said we couldn't handle an army of 30,000,000. Fighting in Iraq and fighting an army of that size are two different kinds of war. Doesn't matter though because their army isn't that big lol.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
Trebel
Luke Warm

Joined: 13 Oct 2002 Posts: 213
|
Posted: 10/24/04 - 23:01 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
You guys are f*****g morons. We invaded a country and overthrew an oppressive dictator w/ just over 1000 casualties. Whoever said we are barely handling Iraq is f*****g stupid. Look at the numbers, we anally raped the Iraqi army and Saddam. Yes people are still dying, but in the end Iraq will be a better place. If you want something to get your panties in a knot over pick something like cigarettes or alcohol. They kill far more people then this war on Iraq ever will.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|